Impact of FDG PET Standardized Uptake Value in Resected Clinical Stage IA Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

BACKGROUND: A significant proportion of patients with clinical stage IA non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) experience will recurrence and decreased survival after surgery. This study examined the impact of preoperative primary tumor positron emission tomography (PET) scan maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) on oncologic outcomes after surgery. METHODS: This was a retrospective review of 251 patients who underwent surgical treatment of clinical stage IA NSCLC at an academic medical center (2005-2014). Patients were classified according to PET SUVmax level (low vs high) for analysis of upstaging, tumor recurrence, and overall survival. RESULTS: Median SUVmax values were higher in squamous cell carcinoma than in adenocarcinoma (median 3.3 vs 7.2; P < .0001). There were 109 (43.4%) patients in the SUVmax low group and 142 (56.6%) in the SUVmax high group. Patients with SUVmax high had larger tumors. SUVmax high was associated with higher rates of nodal upstaging (16.2% vs 4.6% in SUVmax low; P = .004), particularly in N1 nodes. SUVmax high was independently associated with nodal upstaging (adjusted odds ratio, 3.95; 95% CI, 1.36-11.46; P = .011). SUVmax high was associated with time to recurrence (hazard ratio, 1.62; 95% CI, 1.03-2.54; P = .036), but this association was lost on multivariable analysis (hazard ratio, 1.52; 95% CI, 0.91-2.54; P = .106). SUVmax was not associated with overall survival. CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative PET SUVmax level is strongly associated with nodal upstaging, particularly in N1 nodes, in patients with clinical stage IA NSCLC who undergo resection. PET SUVmax should be regarded as a risk factor when considering candidacy for sublobar resections and in future trials involving patients with stage I NSCLC.

A Comparison of Negative Pressure and Conventional Therapy in Infected Open Chest Wounds.

Background: The role of negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) in the management of open chest wounds is unclear. Our aim was to determine the safety and efficacy of NPWT compared with conventional therapy for open chest wounds. Methods: Ten patients with infected open chest wounds were included in a prospective trial of NPWT after surgical debridement. Their outcomes were compared with those of 11 control patients treated during the same period with surgical debridement and open chest packing only. The control group data were obtained by retrospective review of medical records. Results: The median duration of NPWT was eight days (range 2-29 days), with closure in eight patients (80%). Two patients having NPWT had unveiling of occult pleural fistulas leading to early discontinuation. The patients having NPWT had a shorter median time to closure (7 versus 18 days; p = 0.071) and shorter initial (median 6 versus 20 days; p = 0.026) and total (median 6 versus 25 days; p = 0.024) hospital length of stay. Control patients had higher rates of new-onset atrial fibrillation (46% versus 0; p = 0.035) and septic shock (64% versus 10%; p = 0.024). The chest was either closed or healing at the time of the last visit in 100% of the NPWT patients versus 73% of control patients (p = 0.28). The 1-year survival estimates were 90% for the NPWT patients and 80% for the control patients (p = 0.69). Conclusion: Negative pressure wound therapy is feasible and safe for open infected chest wounds in selected patients compared with open packing alone and may reduce hospital stay duration and major complication rates.

Safety of air travel in the immediate postoperative period after anatomic pulmonary resection.

OBJECTIVE: The study objective was to determine whether air travel in the immediate postoperative period after anatomic pulmonary resection is associated with increased morbidity or mortality. METHODS: All patients undergoing anatomic pulmonary resection at the Mayo Clinic (2005-2012) were identified and sent surveys querying their mode of transportation home after hospital dismissal and any complications encountered during or shortly after this travel. This included pneumonia, hospital readmission, deep venous thrombosis/pulmonary embolism, and specific pleural complications (pneumothorax, empyema, or chest tube placement). We compared the results of patients returning home by conventional ground travel with the results of patients using air travel. RESULTS: Surveys were sent to 1833 patients, and 817 responded (44.6% response rate). A total of 96 responders (11.8%) used air travel (median distance, 1783 km; range, 486-9684 km) compared with 278 km (range, 1-2618 km) for the 721 responders (88.2%) using ground travel (P < .0001). Male patients used air travel more than female patients (14.4% vs 9.3%; P = .02). Otherwise, no significant differences were observed between the 2 groups. The median duration of hospitalization was 5 days in both groups using air travel (range, 1-25 days) and ground travel (range, 1-42 days) (P = .83). There was no mortality due to postdismissal travel. The rates of major complication after hospital dismissal for those using air and ground travel were 8.3% and 7.8%, respectively (P = .87). CONCLUSIONS: Overall major complications are rare in the immediate posthospital dismissal period after lung resection. Air travel during this period was not associated with any significant increase in risk of complications when compared with conventional ground transportation and seems to be a safe option for patients after chest tube removal.