Validation of Faecal Pyruvate Kinase Isoenzyme Type M2 (Faecal M2PK Quick) Test in Detection of Colorectal Adenoma and Adenocarcinoma Among High-Risk Malaysian Population.

BACKGROUND: Colorectal neoplasia is a multistep process that can lead to the development of colorectal cancer. Colonoscopy is the gold standard for diagnosis and screening of colorectal cancer, but its uptake is often hindered by unpleasant experiences and logistic obstacles. Therefore, non-invasive biomarker tests such as the M2-pyruvate kinase (M2PK) test have been explored as a potential screening tool. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of the M2PK Quick Stool Test (ScheBo®) in detecting colorectal adenoma and adenocarcinoma in high-risk Malaysian populations using colonoscopy as the comparison. METHODS: A prospective, cross-sectional, multicenter study was conducted from December 2017 to December 2019 in four hospitals in Malaysia. Participants were eligible if they met any of the following criteria: personal or family history of colorectal polyps or cancer, inherited syndromes, altered bowel habits, rectal bleeding, unintended weight loss, loss of appetite, abdominal pain or cramps, or unexplained iron deficiency, or an Asia-Pacific Colorectal Screening score of 4-7. Participants provided a stool sample that was tested for M2PK using the M2PK Quick Test. Participants then underwent a colonoscopy, and any lesions found were biopsied and sent for histopathological examination. RESULTS: A total of 562 participants were included in the study, of whom 89 had a positive M2PK test. Presence of adenoma and/or dysplastic lesions were confirmed in 14.4% and adenocarcinoma in 3.0% of the participants. The M2PK Quick Stool Test showed a sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of 58.8%, 85.5%, 11.2% and 98.5%, respectively in detecting colorectal adenocarcinoma. For detection of colorectal adenoma, this test yielded a sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV of 27.3%, 86.3%, 27.0% and 86.5%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The M2PK Quick Stool Test showed a moderate accuracy in detecting colorectal adenocarcinoma and adenomas in the studied population.

Comparison of noninvasive screening tools for hepatic fibrosis, association with methotrexate cumulative dose, and risk factors in psoriasis patients.

Methotrexate (MTX) is a first-line systemic psoriasis therapy with risk of liver fibrosis. Noninvasive tools for liver fibrosis screening are Fibroscan®, Fibrosis-4 (FIB-4) index, and aspartate aminotransferase-to-platelet ratio (APRI) index. To compare Fibroscan®, FIB-4, and APRI in detecting fibrosis, determine association of fibrosis with MTX cumulative dose, and explore risk factors for fibrosis. A case-control study involving psoriasis patients aged ≥18 years with MTX cumulative dose ≥1 g, with age and sex-matched MTX naïve psoriasis patients was performed. Noninvasive tools were used to assess liver fibrosis. Sixty-one patients on MTX and 54 controls participated. Fibroscan® detected fibrosis in 22 (36.1%) patients on MTX compared to 11 (19.6%) controls (p = 0.05). FIB-4 predicted fibrosis in 13 (21.3%) patients on MTX and in 10 (17.9%) controls (p = 0.64) while APRI diagnosed 7 (11.5%) versus 7 (12.5%), p = 0.65. No significant correlation between Fibroscan® assessed liver stiffness and MTX cumulative dose (p = 0.47). Independent risk factors for liver fibrosis were MTX use with raised alanine aminotransferase (OR = 68.56, 95% CI 8.26; 568.86, p < 0.001), diabetes mellitus (OR = 30.35, 95% CI 7.52; 122.42, p < 0.001), and raised BMI (obese patients OR = 8.26, 95% CI 1.73-39.43, p = 0.02; overweight patients OR = 6.29, 95% CI 1.28-30.99, p = 0.01). Liver fibrosis occurred in both MTX naïve and MTX-treated psoriasis patients. Fibroscan® detected higher prevalence of liver fibrosis compared to FIB-4 and APRI. Cumulative MTX does not correlate with fibrosis severity. Fibroscan® is recommended prior to MTX therapy and at regular intervals especially among patients with diabetes and increased BMI.

Validation of models using basic parameters to differentiate intestinal tuberculosis from Crohn's disease: A multicenter study from Asia.

BACKGROUND: Data on external validation of models developed to distinguish Crohn's disease (CD) from intestinal tuberculosis (ITB) are limited. This study aimed to validate and compare models using clinical, endoscopic, and/or pathology findings to differentiate CD from ITB. METHODS: Data from newly diagnosed ITB and CD patients were retrospectively collected from 5 centers located in Thailand or Hong Kong. The data was applied to Lee, et al., Makharia, et al., Jung, et al., and Limsrivilai, et al. model. RESULTS: Five hundred and thirty patients (383 CD, 147 ITB) with clinical and endoscopic data were included. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of Limsrivilai's clinical-endoscopy (CE) model was 0.853, which was comparable to the value of 0.862 in Jung's model (p = 0.52). Both models performed significantly better than Lee's endoscopy model (AUROC: 0.713, p<0.01). Pathology was available for review in 199 patients (116 CD, 83 ITB). When 3 modalities were combined, Limsrivilai's clinical-endoscopy-pathology (CEP) model performed significantly better (AUROC: 0.887) than Limsrivilai's CE model (AUROC: 0.824, p = 0.01), Jung's model (AUROC: 0.798, p = 0.005) and Makharia's model (AUROC: 0.637, p<0.01). In 83 ITB patients, the rate of misdiagnosis with CD when used the proposed cutoff values in each original study was 9.6% for Limsrivilai's CEP, 15.7% for Jung's, and 66.3% for Makharia's model. CONCLUSIONS: Scoring systems with more parameters and diagnostic modalities performed better; however, application to clinical practice is still limited owing to high rate of misdiagnosis of ITB as CD. Models integrating more modalities such as imaging and serological tests are needed.

Significant Medical and Surgical Morbidity in Perianal Crohn's Disease: Results from a Territory-Wide Study.

BACKGROUND: The presence of perianal fistulas in Crohn's disease [CD] denotes increased disease aggressiveness. We studied the epidemiology and clinical outcomes of perianal CD [PCD] using the Hong Kong territory-wide IBD Registry [HKIBDR]. METHODS: Consecutive patients with PCD were identified from the HKIBDR, and disease characteristics, treatments, and outcomes were analysed. The risks for medical and surgical therapies were assessed using Kaplan-Meier analysis. RESULTS: Among 981 patients with CD with 10530 patient-years of follow-up, 283 [28.8%] had perianal involvement, of which 120 [42.4%] were as first presentation. The mean age at diagnosis of PCD was 29.1 years, and 78.8% were male. The median follow-up duration was 106 months (interquartile range [IQR]: 65-161 months]. Perianal fistula [84.8%] and perianal abscess [52.7%] were the two commonest forms. Male, younger age at diagnosis of CD, and penetrating phenotypes were associated with development of PCD in multivariate analysis. Of 242 patients with fistulizing PCD, 70 [29.2%] required ≥5 courses of antibiotics, and 98 [40.5%] had ≥2 surgical procedures. Nine patients required defunctioning surgery and 4 required proctectomy. Eighty-four patients [34.7%] received biologics. Cumulative probabilities for use of biologics were 4.7%, 5.8%, and 8.6% at 12 months, 36 months, and 96 months, respectively, while the probabilities for surgery were 67.2%, 71.6%, and 77.7%, respectively. Five mortalities were recorded, including 2 cases of anal cancer, 2 CD-related complications, and one case of pneumonia. CONCLUSION: Over 40% of CD patients presented with perianal disease at diagnosis. Patients with PCD had poor outcome, with young age of onset, multiple antibiotic use, and repeated surgery.

A Prospective Study to Monitor for Tuberculosis During Anti-tumour Necrosis Factor Therapy in Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease and Immune-mediated Inflammatory Diseases.

BACKGROUND: Biologic therapies have revolutionised the treatment of immune-mediated diseases including inflammatory bowel disease [IBD] and rheumatological disorders. However, biologic treatments are associated with an increased risk of reactivation of latent tuberculosis. Data from regular monitoring for latent tuberculosis infection [LTBI] during biologic treatment are lacking. METHODS: Consecutive patients eligible for biologic therapies were screened for LTBI and prospectively followed up for 3 years. Incidence and risk factors of latent tuberculosis tests conversion (interferon gamma release assays [IGRA], tuberculin skin tests [TST], and chest radiography [CXR]) with clinical outcomes were studied. RESULTS: A total of 108 patients [83 IBD; 25 rheumatological disorders] were included. At baseline, 18/108 [16.7%] patients [five IBD; 13 rheumatological disorders] were tested positive for LTBI. Of these, 14/18 [77.8%] patients received isoniazid monotherapy for 9 months. Of the remainder, 17/90 [18.9%] patients had LTBI test conversion while on biologic therapies and of these 14/17 [82.4%] received isoniazid monotherapy for 9 months. Age, sex, smoking status, alcohol use, travel history, disease type, and immunosuppressive therapy were not associated with LTBI test conversion. In subjects with IGRA conversion, serial IGRA levels normalised after completion of isoniazid except in one patient whose IGRA remained persistently elevated despite isoniazid and who subsequently developed active TB. CONCLUSIONS: Conversion of LTBI is common and occurred early during biologic therapy in an area with intermediate TB burden. Subjects with latent TB tests conversion and persistently high IGRA levels may have an increased risk of TB reactivation or development of active TB, and they require close observation or intensive workup for active TB.