RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a prevalent condition in Taiwan, and the incidence of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is on the rise. This study aimed to evaluate the postoperative results of patients with different degrees of CKD after TKA, using data from the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database. METHODS: The study analyzed 3078 patients who received TKA from 2012 to 2017, equally divided into three groups: none-CKD, mild CKD (without dialysis), and severe CKD (with dialysis). Propensity score matching was used to minimize selection bias. RESULTS: After TKA, there was no significant difference in the risk of debridement surgery for infection between the three groups (adjusted HR of mild CKD: 0.71 95% CI=0.36-1.38, p=0.3073; adjusted HR of severe CKD: 1.14, 95% CI=0.63-2.06, p=0.6616). However, CKD patients requiring dialysis had a significantly higher risk of mortality (adjusted HR: 1.98, 95% CI=1.57-2.50, p<0.001) and readmission within 90days of any causes (adjusted HR: 1.83, 95% CI=1.48-2.26, p<0.001) than non-CKD and mild CKD patients. CONCLUSION: Severe CKD patients needing dialysis after TKA have a higher risk of mortality and readmission rates than that of the non-CKD or mild CKD patients. If the patient is in the early stage of CKD, their prognosis after receiving TKA is expected to be as good as non-CKD patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV; well-designed cohort study.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Current treatment options for both unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) are still controversial with no consistent results in which one is superior to others. This is the first study to examine and analyze the following related data available in patients receiving either UKA or TKA from the National Health Research Database (NHIRD) in Taiwan. METHODS: The database was searched from NHIRD, pooling one million random patients. Patients' age, gender, and comorbidities were analyzed in either UKA or TKA between January 2005 and December 2013, or up until death. For the patients that had received bilateral surgeries, further subgrouping was divided into TKA to TKA, UKA to UKA, TKA to UKA, and UKA to TKA to analyze the completion rate curve. Additional analysis of the order codes 64202B, 64053B, and 64198B was defined as failures, and the related failure rate curves were analyzed separately within ten years. Finally, infection-related codes were analyzed. RESULTS: 6,179 patients (n = 276 UKA; n = 5903 TKA) were selected. Age (p < 0.0001) and gender (p = 0.037) had significant differences, with more young population and males having UKA than TKA. Most comorbidities had no significant difference. For the bilateral surgery analysis, the UKA to UKA group had the fastest completion rate (p < 0.001) and UKA to TKA was the slowest. There were no significant differences in the failure rates of 64202B, 64053B, and 64198B. CONCLUSION: Most UKA and TKA are appropriate solutions to treat patients with osteoarthritis or osteonecrosis. UKA to UKA is the quickest bilateral completion surgery, and UKA has a higher chance of undergoing revision surgery than TKA.
