Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
1.
Am J Manag Care ; 14(3): 158-66, 2008 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18333708

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To describe the development and assessment of the Abbreviated Fine Severity Score (AFSS), a simplified version of the Pneumonia Severity Index (PSI) suitable for providing risk-adjusted reports to clinicians caring for patients hospitalized with community-acquired pneumonia. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. METHODS: We defined the AFSS based on data available in administrative and laboratory databases. We downloaded and linked these hospitalization and laboratory data from 2 cohorts (11,030 patients and 6147 patients) hospitalized with community-acquired pneumonia in all Kaiser Permanente Medical Care Program hospitals in northern California. We then assessed the relationship between the AFSS and mortality, length of stay, intensive care unit admission, and the use of assisted ventilation. Using logistic regression analysis, we assessed the performance of the AFSS and determined the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (c statistic). Using a combination of manual and electronic medical record review, we compared the AFSS with the full PSI in 2 subsets of patients in northern California and Denver, Colorado, whose medical records were manually reviewed. RESULTS: The AFSS compares favorably with the PSI with respect to predicting mortality. It has good discrimination with respect to inhospital (c = 0.74) and 30-day (c = 0.75) mortality. It also correlates strongly with the PSI (r = 0.87 and r = 0.93 in the 2 medical record review subsets). CONCLUSIONS: The AFSS can be used to provide clinically relevant risk-adjusted outcomes reports to clinicians in an integrated healthcare delivery system. It is possible to apply risk-adjustment methods from research settings to operational ones.


Assuntos
Infecções Comunitárias Adquiridas/epidemiologia , Pneumonia/epidemiologia , California/epidemiologia , Infecções Comunitárias Adquiridas/classificação , Infecções Comunitárias Adquiridas/mortalidade , Bases de Dados Factuais , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Sistemas Computadorizados de Registros Médicos , Pneumonia/classificação , Pneumonia/mortalidade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Índice de Gravidade de Doença
2.
Bipolar Disord ; 9(5): 526-30, 2007 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17680924

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate demographic and clinical predictors of suicide attempt and suicide death in a population-based sample of people treated for bipolar disorder (BD). METHODS: Computerized records were used to identify 32,360 individuals treated for BD at two large prepaid health plans. Suicide attempts were identified using computerized records of outpatient visit diagnoses and hospital discharge diagnoses. Suicide deaths were identified using state death certificate data. RESULTS: Overall event rates were 1.06 per 1,000 person-years for suicide death, 5.6 per 1,000 person-years for suicide attempt leading to hospitalization, and 13.9 per 1,000 person-years for suicide attempt not leading to hospitalization. Men had a significantly lower rate of suicide attempt [hazard ratio (HR) 0.68, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.56-0.83] but a higher rate of suicide death (HR 2.70, 95% CI 1.69-4.31). Suicide attempts were significantly more frequent among younger patients, but suicide deaths did not vary significantly by age. Substance use comorbidity was significantly related to risk of suicide attempt (HR 2.53, 95% CI 2.07-3.09) but not to risk of suicide death (HR 1.02, 95% CI 0.54-1.93). Comorbid anxiety disorder was associated with significantly higher risk of both suicide attempt (HR 1.40, 95% CI 1.14-1.72) and suicide death (HR 1.81, 95% CI 1.09-2.99). CONCLUSIONS: Among people treated for BD, risk of suicide death is significantly related to male sex and comorbid anxiety disorder. The predictors of suicide death differ markedly from predictors of suicide attempt.


Assuntos
Transtorno Bipolar/tratamento farmacológico , Transtorno Bipolar/epidemiologia , Tentativa de Suicídio/estatística & dados numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Estudos de Coortes , Comorbidade , Feminino , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Prontuários Médicos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Alta do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Fatores de Risco , Suicídio/estatística & dados numéricos
3.
J Clin Psychiatry ; 65(7): 959-65, 2004 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15291685

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) are widely used as the first-line treatment for depression. Information regarding their side effects is mostly based on controlled clinical trials. METHOD: Patients who received an SSRI for a new or recurrent case of depression (ICD-9 code 296.2 or 311) between December 15, 1999, and May 31, 2000 were interviewed by telephone 75 to 105 days after initiation of SSRI therapy. Using closed-ended questions, investigators asked patients if they experienced any of 17 side effects commonly associated with SSRIs, how bothersome they were, and what their duration was. Prescribing physicians completed a written survey providing their estimates about frequency of side effects associated with SSRIs and how bothersome those side effects are. RESULTS: Of 401 patients who completed the phone interview, 344 patients (86%) reported at least 1 side effect, and 219 patients (55%) experienced 1 or more bothersome side effect(s). The most common bothersome side effects were sexual dysfunction and drowsiness (17% each). While most side effects first occurred within the first 2 weeks of treatment, the majority of patients were still experiencing the same side effects at the time of interview, most notably blurred vision (85%) and sexual dysfunction (83%). Overall, physicians (N = 137) significantly underestimated the occurrence of the 17 side effects explored, and they tended to underrate how bothersome those side effects were to their patients. CONCLUSION: Side effects associated with SSRIs are common and bothersome to patients. Treatment-emergent side effects tend to persist during the first 3 months of treatment.


Assuntos
Atitude do Pessoal de Saúde , Atitude Frente a Saúde , Transtorno Depressivo/tratamento farmacológico , Inibidores Seletivos de Recaptação de Serotonina/efeitos adversos , Disfunções Sexuais Psicogênicas/induzido quimicamente , Adulto , Transtorno Depressivo/psicologia , Feminino , Sistemas Pré-Pagos de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Incidência , Entrevistas como Assunto , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Padrões de Prática Médica/estatística & dados numéricos , Inibidores Seletivos de Recaptação de Serotonina/uso terapêutico , Disfunções Sexuais Psicogênicas/diagnóstico , Disfunções Sexuais Psicogênicas/epidemiologia , Fases do Sono/efeitos dos fármacos , Fatores de Tempo , Transtornos da Visão/induzido quimicamente , Transtornos da Visão/diagnóstico , Transtornos da Visão/epidemiologia , Xerostomia/induzido quimicamente , Xerostomia/diagnóstico , Xerostomia/epidemiologia
4.
Pharmacotherapy ; 23(9): 1175-85, 2003 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14524649

RESUMO

To measure the effects of a collaborative care model that emphasized the role of clinical pharmacists in providing drug therapy management and treatment follow-up to patients with depression, we conducted a randomized controlled trial at a staff model health maintenance organization. We compared the outcomes of subjects treated in this collaborative care model (75 patients, intervention group) with subjects receiving usual care (50 patients, control group). After 6 months, the intervention group demonstrated a significantly higher drug adherence rate than that of the control group (67% vs 48%, odds ratio 2.17, 95% confidence interval 1.04-4.51, p=0.038). Patient satisfaction was significantly greater among members randomly assigned to pharmacists' services than among controls, and provider satisfaction surveys revealed high approval rates as well. Changes in resource utilization were favorable for the intervention group, but differences from the control group did not achieve statistical significance. Clinical improvement was noted in both groups, but the difference was not significant. Clinical pharmacists had a favorable effect on multiple aspects of patient care. Future studies of this model in other health care settings appear warranted.


Assuntos
Comportamento Cooperativo , Depressão/tratamento farmacológico , Modelos Organizacionais , Atenção Primária à Saúde , Coleta de Dados , Sistemas Pré-Pagos de Saúde , Humanos , Equipe de Assistência ao Paciente , Cooperação do Paciente , Satisfação do Paciente , Farmacêuticos , Resultado do Tratamento
5.
JAMA ; 288(11): 1403-9, 2002 Sep 18.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12234237

RESUMO

CONTEXT: Although current depression treatment guidelines recommend continuing antidepressant therapy for at least 4 to 9 months, many patients discontinue treatment prematurely, within 3 months. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the relationship between patient-physician communication and the continuation of treatment with antidepressants and to explore the demographics, adverse effects, therapeutic response, and frequency of follow-up visits. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS: A total of 401 telephone interviews of depressed patients being treated with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) therapy between December 15, 1999, and May 31, 2000, were conducted and 137 prescribing physicians completed written surveys from Northern California Kaiser Permanente health maintenance organization outpatient clinics. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Patient-physician communication about therapy duration and about adverse effects; therapy discontinuation or medication switching within 3 months after start of SSRI therapy. RESULTS: Ninety-nine physicians (72%) reported that they usually ask patients to continue using antidepressants for at least 6 months, but 137 patients (34%) reported that their physicians asked them to continue using antidepressants for this duration and 228 (56%) reported receiving no instructions. Patients who said they were told to take their medication for less than 6 months were 3 times more likely to discontinue therapy (odds ratio [OR], 3.12; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.21-8.07) compared with patients who said they were told to continue therapy longer. Patients who discussed adverse effects with their physicians were less likely to discontinue therapy than patients who did not discuss them (OR, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.25-0.95). Patients who reported discussing adverse effects with their physicians were more likely to switch medications (OR, 5.60; 95% CI, 2.31-13.60). Fewer than 3 follow-up visits for depression, adverse effects, and lack of therapeutic response to medication were also associated with patients' discontinuing therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Discrepancies exist between instructions that physicians report they communicate to patients and what patients remember being told. Explicit instructions about expected duration of therapy and discussions about medication adverse effects throughout treatment may reduce discontinuation of SSRI use. Our finding that patients with 3 or more follow-up visits were more likely to continue using the initially prescribed antidepressant medication suggests that frequent patient-physician contact may increase the probability that patients will continue therapy.


Assuntos
Antidepressivos/uso terapêutico , Transtorno Depressivo/tratamento farmacológico , Cooperação do Paciente , Relações Médico-Paciente , Inibidores Seletivos de Recaptação de Serotonina/uso terapêutico , Adulto , Idoso , Atitude Frente a Saúde , Continuidade da Assistência ao Paciente , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade
6.
Ann Pharmacother ; 36(4): 578-84, 2002 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11918502

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To describe reasons for discontinuing or switching selective serotonin-reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) at 3 and 6 months after starting treatment, and to identify information provided to patients that may help prevent premature discontinuation of medication. METHODS: Telephone surveys were conducted at 3 and 6 months after patients (n = 672) were started on an SSRI for a new or recurrent case of depression. RESULTS: Significantly more patients discontinued or switched their SSRI because of an adverse effect within the first 3 months of starting (43%) compared with the second 3 months (27%; p = 0.023). The adverse effect most frequently reported as the reason for early discontinuation or switching was drowsiness/fatigue (10.2%), followed by anxiety, headache, and nausea - all at just over 5%. The odds ratio for discontinuation was 61% less in patients who recalled being told to take the medication for at least 6 months compared with those who did not (OR 0.39; p < 0.001). Patients who recalled being informed of potential adverse effects increased their reported incidence of mild to moderate adverse effects by 55% (OR 1.55; p < 0.05) without affecting rates of premature discontinuation (OR 1.06; p = 0.77). CONCLUSIONS: Adverse effects are the most frequent reason for discontinuing or switching SSRIs within the first 3 months of treatment. Patients are more likely to continue taking their antidepressant if they fully understand how long to take the medication. Informing patients of potential adverse effects does not appear to prevent premature discontinuation, but may increase the patient's awareness and reporting of mild to moderate adverse effects.


Assuntos
Monitoramento de Medicamentos/métodos , Inibidores Seletivos de Recaptação de Serotonina/efeitos adversos , Recusa do Paciente ao Tratamento/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Idoso , Ansiedade/induzido quimicamente , Coleta de Dados , Fadiga/induzido quimicamente , Feminino , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Náusea/induzido quimicamente , Seleção de Pacientes
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...