Asymmetric 6-Strand Flexor Tendon Repair - Biomechanical Analysis Using Barbed Suture.

Background: This study investigates the biomechanical performance of the Asymmetric flexor tendon repair technique using barbed suture. The Asymmetric repair technique using monofilament nylon suture was previously reported to have a higher tensile strength than the modified Lim-Tsai repair technique, but its repair stiffness and load to gap force were significantly lower. There is hence an unmet need to improve this technique and the substitution of nylon suture with barbed sutures may be the solution. Methods: Two groups consisting of 10 porcine tendons each were repaired with the six-strand Asymmetric repair technique using V-Loc® 3-0 and Supramid® 4-0 respectively. The repairs were subjected to a mechanical tester for static testing. The ultimate tensile strength, load to 2 mm gap force, repair stiffness, time taken to complete a repair and failure mechanism of the repairs were recorded and analyzed. Results: All the repairs using V-Loc® 3-0 sutures had significantly higher median values of ultimate tensile strength (64.1 N; 56.9 N), load to 2 mm gap force (39.2 N; 19.7 N), repair stiffness (6.4 N/mm; 4.7 N/mm) and time taken to complete a repair (9.4 mins; 7.7 mins). All the repairs using V-Loc® sutures failed by suture breakage while 80% of repairs using Supramid® sutures failed by suture pullout. Conclusions: The use of the barbed sutures in the Asymmetric repair technique, whilst more time consuming, has shown promising improvement to its biomechanical performance (i.e. better ultimate tensile strength, stiffness and resistance to gap formation).

Are Flexor Tendon Ruptures Ever Spontaneous? - A Literature Review on Closed Flexor Tendon Ruptures of the Little Finger.

Background: When closed ruptures of flexor tendons of fingers occur, there is often an identifiable pathology, which should be addressed in the same surgical setting as the tendon repair. The concept of "spontaneous" tendon rupture, occurring in the absence of identified pathology, however, has also been reported in a significant number of papers. This controversy has prompted us to do a review of the existing literature. Methods: We did a review of cases of closed ruptures of the flexor digitorum profundus (FDP) of the little finger in existing literature. Fifty-three publications were retrieved by searching "FDP tendon rupture" and "little finger" using PubMed database. We analyzed data such as the zone of rupture noted intra-operatively; and any precipitating factors, pathology or trauma. We also conducted a review on papers which discussed the concept of "spontaneous rupture". Results: Fifty-three publications were retrieved. There were 8 cases of ruptures in Zone I; 2 in Zone II; 30 in Zone III; 59 in Zone IV and 5 in Zone V. Majority of cases were associated with an element of trauma of varying severity, or pathology. A precipitating cause was not documented in 12 cases. Amongst all 36 cases of ruptures labelled as "spontaneous", only 1 case was truly "spontaneous" without any associated trauma or pathology. Conclusions: Most reports labeled as spontaneous rupture occurred in Zone III, where tendon ruptures are rare. There are documented pathological causes or evidence of trauma to most of these cases. We conclude these ruptures may have been mislabeled as spontaneous ruptures. Bearing in mind the propensity for tendon excursion, we suspect the lack of documentation of exploration in proximal zones contributed to this mislabeling. Understanding this concept of non-spontaneity to most tendon ruptures and the common sites of rupture or pathology is crucial for a surgeon to make strategic incisions and minimize future recurrence.