Novel Neovaginoplasty Using Rudimentary Uterine Horn Serosa and Pelvic Peritoneum as a Graft in Müllerian Anomalies with Vaginal Agenesis.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To study the outcome of a novel method of laparoscopic neovaginal reconstruction using rudimentary uterine horn serosa and the pelvic peritoneum as a graft. DESIGN: Canadian Task Force classification II-1. SETTING: A university hospital. PATIENTS: A retrospective study of 14 patients from 2000 to 2014 of patients with vaginal agenesis who underwent laparoscopic neovagina reconstruction using rudimentary uterine horn serosa and the pelvic peritoneum as a graft. INTERVENTION: Patients with vaginal agenesis associated with müllerian agenesis who requested surgery. Tertiary referral center and laparoscopic unit. The creation of a neovagina using rudimentary uterine horn serosa and the pelvic peritoneum as a graft via a combined laparoscopic and vaginal route. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Data were collected retrospectively including postoperative vaginal length and width, complications, stenosis or reoperations, dyspareunia, and sexual satisfaction. There were no major complications from the surgery with no rectal perforation or bladder or ureteric injury. The postoperative mean (±SD) vaginal length was 6.0±0.7 cm and a width of 2 fingerbreadths. The mean operation time was 142.7±45.9 min. Median blood loss was 100 ml (range: 10 to 300 mL). The mean duration of the hospital stay was 6.6±1.6 days. The follow-up period ranged from 3 to 84 months with a median follow-up of 11 months. CONCLUSION: Lee's method of neovaginoplasty using rudimentary uterine horn serosa and the pelvic peritoneum as a graft is a good method for neovagina creation with minimal morbidity, fast recovery, and minimal complications. This method results in good anatomic and functional outcome and can be a method that is widely used.

Comparison of morcellator and culdotomy for extraction of uterine fibroids laparoscopically.

OBJECTIVE: To define a rational guideline for the removal of uterine fibroids after laparoscopic myomectomy (LM) by culdotomy or morcellator in multiparae. STUDY DESIGN: A total of 416 multiparae receiving LM were retrospectively studied between November 1997 and January 2014. Of these, 335 had fibroids removed by culdotomy and 81 by a laparoscopic 15mm electromechanical morcellator. Data on parity, number, size and weight of fibroids, operating time, specimen removal time, blood loss, postoperative stay, hospital charges and complications were recorded. The patients were analyzed in four subgroups stratified by main fibroid size and type of procedure. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in body mass index, number of fibroids removed, blood loss, complications, and hospitalization duration between the groups. For fibroids below 10cm, the morcellator was significantly faster compared to culdotomy (10min versus 12min, p<0.001). For fibroids 10cm and above, there was no significant difference in time by culdotomy compared to morcellator (24min versus 20min, p=0.497). The electromechanical morcellator was significantly more expensive. CONCLUSION: Fibroid size of 10cm may be used as a guide for the route of fibroid removal; below 10cm the morcellator is faster but more expensive, for fibroids 10cm and above, culdotomy can be considered as it has a similar removal time to the morcellator in multiparae.