Molecular profiling identifies targeted therapy opportunities in pediatric solid cancer.

To evaluate the clinical impact of molecular tumor profiling (MTP) with targeted sequencing panel tests, pediatric patients with extracranial solid tumors were enrolled in a prospective observational cohort study at 12 institutions. In the 345-patient analytical population, median age at diagnosis was 12 years (range 0-27.5); 298 patients (86%) had 1 or more alterations with potential for impact on care. Genomic alterations with diagnostic, prognostic or therapeutic significance were present in 61, 16 and 65% of patients, respectively. After return of the results, impact on care included 17 patients with a clarified diagnostic classification and 240 patients with an MTP result that could be used to select molecularly targeted therapy matched to identified alterations (MTT). Of the 29 patients who received MTT, 24% had an objective response or experienced durable clinical benefit; all but 1 of these patients received targeted therapy matched to a gene fusion. Of the diagnostic variants identified in 209 patients, 77% were gene fusions. MTP with targeted panel tests that includes fusion detection has a substantial clinical impact for young patients with solid tumors.

A Transition Zone Showing Highly Discontinuous or Alternating Levels of Stem Cell and Proliferation Markers Characterizes the Development of PTEN-Haploinsufficient Colorectal Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Stepwise acquisition of oncogene mutations and deletion/inactivation of tumor suppressor genes characterize the development of colorectal cancer (CRC). These genetic events interact with discrete morphologic transitions from hyperplastic mucosa to adenomatous areas, followed by in situ malignant transformation and finally invasive carcinoma. The goal of this study was to identify tissue markers of the adenoma-carcinoma morphogenetic transitions in CRC. METHODS AND FINDINGS: We analyzed the patterns of expression of growth regulatory and stem cell markers across these distinct morphologic transition zones in 735 primary CRC tumors. In 202 cases with preserved adenoma-adenocarcinoma transition, we identified, in 37.1% of cases, a zone of adenomatous epithelium, located immediately adjacent to the invasive component, that showed rapidly alternating intraglandular stretches of PTEN+ and PTEN- epithelium. This zone exactly overlapped with similar alternating expression of Ki-67 and inversely with the transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-ß) growth regulator SMAD4. These zones also show parallel alternating levels and/or subcellular localization of multiple cancer stem/progenitor cell (CSC) markers, including ß-catenin/CTNNB1, ALDH1, and CD44. PTEN was always re-expressed in the invasive tumor in these cases, unlike those with complete loss of PTEN expression. Genomic microarray analysis of CRC with prominent CSC-like expansions demonstrated a high frequency of PTEN genomic deletion/haploinsufficiency in tumors with CSC-like transition zones (62.5%) but not in tumors with downregulated but non-alternating PTEN expression (14.3%). There were no significant differences in the levels of KRAS mutation or CTNNB1 mutation in CSC-like tumors as compared to unselected CRC cases. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, we have identified a distinctive CSC-like pre-invasive transition zone in PTEN-haploinsufficient CRC that shows convergent on-off regulation of the PTEN/AKT, TGF-ß/SMAD and Wnt/ß-catenin pathways. This bottleneck-like zone is usually followed by the emergence of invasive tumors with intact PTEN expression but dysregulated TP53 and uniformly high proliferation rates.

Annotation of Sequence Variants in Cancer Samples: Processes and Pitfalls for Routine Assays in the Clinical Laboratory.

As DNA sequencing of multigene panels becomes routine for cancer samples in the clinical laboratory, an efficient process for classifying variants has become more critical. Determining which germline variants are significant for cancer disposition and which somatic mutations are integral to cancer development or therapy response remains difficult, even for well-studied genes such as BRCA1 and TP53. We compare and contrast the general principles and lines of evidence commonly used to distinguish the significance of cancer-associated germline and somatic genetic variants. The factors important in each step of the analysis pipeline are reviewed, as are some of the publicly available annotation tools. Given the range of indications and uses of cancer sequencing assays, including diagnosis, staging, prognostication, theranostics, and residual disease detection, the need for flexible methods for scoring of variants is discussed. The usefulness of protein prediction tools and multimodal risk-based or Bayesian approaches are highlighted. Using TET2 variants encountered in hematologic neoplasms, several examples of this multifactorial approach to classifying sequence variants of unknown significance are presented. Although there are still significant gaps in the publicly available data for many cancer genes that limit the broad application of explicit algorithms for variant scoring, the elements of a more rigorous model are outlined.