The Use of a Retromammary Adipofascial Flap in Breast Augmentation for Patients with Thin Soft Tissue.

BACKGROUND: In patients with a thin soft tissue breast envelope, lower pole implant palpability is a postoperative sequela that concerns patients. Anatomically, the lower aspect of the breast near the inframammary fold lacks sufficient soft tissue to cover the breast implant after augmentation. METHODS: A transareolar incision was made, and subcutaneous dissection was performed. The dissection first proceeded caudally to the lower aspect to the breast parenchyma. The dissection then changed direction and moved cephalad to the mid breast or nipple region. The fatty tissue and pectoralis muscle fascia were cut transversely at this level, and the dissection was reversed caudally in a subfascial plane to the new inframammary fold region. This maneuver created a retromammary adipofascial flap. RESULTS: A total of 368 breast augmentations were performed in 184 patients. Breast implants were inserted in the subfascial plane in 40 patients (21.7%) and in the subpectoral-subfascial plane in 144 patients (78.3%). A total of 368 breast implants were inserted, including 140 smooth cohesive silicone implants (38.0%), 2 textured round implants (0.5%), and 226 anatomic-type implants (61.5%). A cadaveric dissection revealed that a retromammary adipofascial flap measuring 3-4 mm in thickness can be acquired. Capsular contracture occurred in six breasts (1.7%). CONCLUSIONS: During breast augmentation, an inferiorly based retromammary adipofascial flap can be created to help cover the lower pole of the breast from implant palpability. This is helpful especially in patients with thin skin, hypoplastic breasts, or constricted breasts. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Transareolar-perinipple (areolar omega) zigzag incision for augmentation mammaplasty.

BACKGROUND: Optimal augmentation mammaplasty results not only from proper implant size and breast shape, but also from the minimization of postoperative scarring, especially in patients prone to hypertrophic scars. In this context, the authors present a transareolar-perinipple (areolar omega) zigzag approach. METHODS: Between March of 2003 and June of 2012, a total of 613 patients underwent augmentation mammaplasty using a transareolar-perinipple incision. Among them, 45 patients received a classic (straight line) transareolar-perinipple incision, whereas 568 patients received a modified zigzag transareolar-perinipple incision. RESULTS: Patients' ages ranged from 21 to 60 years. Areola size varied from 2.3 to 4.5 cm in diameter. Follow-up duration ranged from 1 to 10 years, with an average of 2 years 7 months. Postoperative complications included capsular contracture, which occurred in 16 patients (2.6 percent). Nine patients (1.5 percent) had Baker class II and seven patients (1.1 percent) had Baker class III capsular contracture. Mild inferior displacement of the implant occurred in four patients (0.6 percent). The prevalence of areolar distortion was 3.4 percent. Nipple hypesthesia was found in approximately 70 percent of the patients, which returned to normal after 2 to 3 months. Based on third-party observers, 74.7 percent of patients who received zigzag transareolar-perinipple incision had excellent to good scarring results. CONCLUSIONS: The transareolar-perinipple (areolar omega) zigzag incision resulted in satisfactory postoperative scarring and surgical results in Asian patients. This method increases the opening of the areolar incision and can be performed in patients with small (<3.5 cm) areolas. This approach can be an alternative in patients who are prone to hypertrophic scarring. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, III.

Subpectoral-subfascial breast augmentation for thin-skinned patients.

BACKGROUND: Among thin patients, upper pole skin of less than 2 cm on a pinch test is an indication for submuscular implant placement. However, rippling, palpability, and visibility of the implant are frequently observed in the lower and lateral aspects of the breast due to the lack of muscle coverage in the area. To overcome these problems, a subpectoral-subfascial breast augmentation was performed including subfascial dissection of the rectus abdominis, external abdominal oblique muscle, and serratus anterior muscle as one sheet to cover the inferolateral aspect of the implant. METHODS: From March 2008 to March 2010, 62 thin patients with hypomastia underwent subpectoral-subfascial breast augmentation. For all these patients, the result of the pinch test was less than 2 cm on the upper pole of the breast and less than 1 cm on the lower and lateral aspect. With a transareolar-perinipple incision, pockets were created such that the superomedial portion was covered by the pectoralis major muscle, and the inferolateral portion was covered by the fascial flap of neighboring muscles. RESULTS: The results were satisfactory, reproducible, and predictable. The implants were not palpable or visible during a mean follow-up period of 19 months due to the inclusion of a fascial flap in all the patients. CONCLUSIONS: This technique, which uses the advantages of both subpectoral and subfascial techniques, can offer a high-grade result. Especially for thin patients with less subcutaneous tissue, it provides excellent upper and lower pole coverage and gives the shape of the breast a natural appearance, with no palpability or rippling.

Capsular flaps for the management of malpositioned implants after augmentation mammoplasty.

Among the reasons for reoperation after augmentation mammaplasty is the malpositioned implant, especially a lowered inframammary fold or symmastia, which is difficult to repair. The peri-implant capsule, a physiologic response to a foreign body, is naturally formed and suitable for use as a flap because of its high vascularity. In addition, it is sufficiently tough for suspension of the implant. The authors introduce the idea that the capsular flap is very useful for the correction of symmastia or a lowered inframammary fold. In such situations, the capsular flaps are used to prevent migration of the implant after raising of the inframammary fold or defining of the midline with capsulorrhaphy. This technique successfully corrected the malpositioned implants in this study, and all the patients were satisfied. There was no recurrence of a lowered inframammary fold or symmastia. These findings suggest that the capsular flap should be considered a safe and effective option for the management of malpositioned implants.

Simple epicanthoplasty with minimal scar.

BACKGROUND: Asian eyelids are characterized by the presence of an epicanthal fold and the absence of a supratarsal fold. Because many Asians desire wide, open, large eyes, elimination of the medial epicanthal fold along with double-eyelid operation frequently are performed for cosmetic improvement. Medial epicanthoplasty enhances the aesthetic result by lengthening the palpebral fissure horizontally, thus producing larger-looking, open eyes. This study describes the author's method for correcting the medial epicanthal fold. METHODS: Simple epicanthoplasty with minimal scar, the author's method, was performed to correct the epicanthal folds of 52 patients from December 2001 to August 2005 at the Catholic University of Korea Kangnam St. Mary's Hospital. RESULTS: This technique yielded excellent results in terms of inconspicuous scar and long-lasting open medial canthal area during a 3-year follow-up period. Of the 52 patients, 2 showed a depressed scar on the lower eyelid, which was corrected satisfactorily. CONCLUSION: Many procedures have been introduced to correct the epicanthal fold, but scarring or undercorrection remains as a dilemma for surgeons to overcome. Simple epicanthoplasty with minimal scar is a simple, easy-to-follow, and effective method that can be applied to various cases of medial epicanthal fold.

Single transconjunctival incision and two-point fixation for the treatment of noncomminuted zygomatic complex fracture.

The ultimate goal in treating zygomatic complex fracture is to obtain an accurate, stable reduction while minimizing external scars and functional deformity. The present authors present our experiences with a single transconjunctival incision and two-point (inferior orbital rim and frontozygomatic suture) fixation in 53 patients with zygomatic complex fracture which were not comminuted. All patients had transconjunctival approaches with lateral canthal extensions, and six out of 53 patients also had an additional small (about less than 2 cm) gingivobuccal incision to achieve an accurate reduction. There were 3 minor complications, and the overall esthetics and functional results were satisfactory with a long term follow-up. Our method has the following advantages in the reduction of zygomatic complex fracture; It leaves only an inconspicuous lateral canthal scar. In addition, it provides excellent simultaneous visualization of the inferior orbital rim and frontozygomatic suture area. Hence, two point fixation through a single incision can be performed with a satisfactory stability.

Evaluation of natural change of skin function in split-thickness skin grafts by noninvasive bioengineering methods.

BACKGROUND: Autologous split-thickness skin grafts (STSGs) are considered the mainstay for the treatment of large full-thickness wounds. There have been few studies reporting the natural change of the skin function in STSGs after procedure, however. OBJECTIVE: The objective was to evaluate the natural change of the skin function in STSG using noninvasive bioengineering methods. METHODS: Eighteen patients were eligible for the study. The skin functions of the graft and the control site were evaluated by an evaporimeter, corneometer, mexameter, and cutometer at Postoperation Days 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months. RESULTS: Transepidermal water loss (TEWL) of the graft was maintained around that of the normal skin. The values of the skin hydration testing generally decreased during the follow-up period. Erythema was highly maintained for the whole period. For the pigmentation, the ratio tended to increase after 6 months. The skin pliability of the graft was abruptly decreased at 0.5 month, and it recovered from 3 to 12 months. The value did not reach that of the normal skin, however. CONCLUSION: Our results showed that the STSGs had changed within the frame of the skin function, including the TEWL, epidermal hydration, color, and pliability, throughout 1 year after surgery. The authors have indicated no significant interest with commercial supporters.

Gluteal fold V-Y advancement flap for vulvar and vaginal reconstruction: a new flap.

BACKGROUND: Soft-tissue reconstruction following vulvar cancer resection is a difficult challenge because of the functional, locational, and cosmetic importance of this region. Although numerous flaps have been designed for vulvar reconstruction, each has its disadvantages. METHODS: The authors introduce the gluteal fold fasciocutaneous V-Y advancement flap for vulvovaginoperineal reconstruction after vulva cancer resection. This flap is supplied by underlying fascial plexus derived from perforators of the internal pudendal artery and musculocutaneous perforators of underlying muscle. The sensory supply of this flap comes from the posterior cutaneous nerve of the thigh and the pudendal nerve. An axis of V-shaped triangular flap is aligned to the gluteal fold. A total of 17 flaps were performed in nine patients. RESULTS: All flaps survived completely, with no complications except for small perineal wound disruption in three patients. CONCLUSIONS: This flap is thin, reliable, sensate, easy to perform, and has matched local skin quality and concealed donor-site scar on the gluteal fold. In addition, it can cover large vulvovaginal defects because it can be advanced farther as a result of the character of the gluteal fold area. In our experience, the gluteal fold fasciocutaneous V-Y advancement flap has proven very useful for vulvar reconstruction, especially at the point of donor-site scar, flap thickness, and degree of flap advancement.

Two flaps and Z-plasty technique for correction of longitudinal ear lobe cleft.

Various surgical techniques have been reported for the correction of congenital ear lobe deformities. Our method, the two-flaps-and-Z-plasty technique, for correcting the longitudinal ear lobe cleft is presented. This technique is simple and easy to perform. It enables us to keep the bulkiness of the ear lobe with minimal tissue sacrifice, and to make a shorter operation scar. The small Z-plasty at the free ear lobe margin avoids notching deformity and makes the shape of the ear lobe smoother. The result is satisfactory in terms of matching the contralateral normal ear lobe in shape and symmetry.