CNP production in the kidney and effects of protein intake restriction in nephrotic syndrome.

C-type natriuretic peptide (CNP) possesses well-established cardiovascular properties. Although present in the mammalian kidney, CNP production in human kidney and its modulation in human renal disease remain less defined. We investigated the presence of CNP in normal human kidney and in patients with nephrotic syndrome (NS). We also addressed whether or not a low-protein diet (LPD) alters plasma CNP and urinary CNP excretion in NS. In situ hybridization studies demonstrated CNP mRNA expression in tubular cells and glomeruli of normal human kidneys. CNP immunoreactivity was positive in proximal, distal, and medullary collecting duct tubular cells in both controls and patients with NS. The ratios of plasma CNP and urinary CNP to creatinine were significantly higher in patients with NS compared with controls. Urinary CNP, but not plasma CNP, was significantly lowered in patients with NS after an LPD. Similarly, the ratios of urinary protein to creatinine and urinary albumin to creatinine, but not urinary guanosine 3',5'-cyclic monophosphate to creatinine, decreased significantly with an LPD. These data confirm and extend previous reports and demonstrate for the first time the presence of CNP in human kidney with NS. We also report increased plasma CNP concentration and urinary CNP excretion in NS patients and a significant reduction of CNP excretion with an LPD. Our findings demonstrate that CNP metabolism is altered in patients with NS and support the hypothesis that activation of renal CNP can be partially offset by an LPD. These results underscore that the beneficial effect of an LPD on protein excretion is paralleled by a substantial reduction in intrarenal CNP release.

The potential of brain natriuretic peptide as a biomarker for New York Heart Association class during the outpatient treatment of heart failure.

BACKGROUND: Plasma C-terminal atrial natriuretic peptide (C-ANP), N-terminal ANP (N-ANP), and brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) have diagnostic utility in detecting left ventricular dysfunction. Their relative value in monitoring symptom status during the chronic treatment of congestive heart failure (CHF) remains undefined. METHODS AND RESULTS: Ninety-eight subjects with CHF were evaluated. Baseline natriuretic peptides were measured by radioimmunoassay, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was estimated with echocardiography, and New York Heart Association (NYHA) class was determined independently by attending heart failure specialists. Forty-one subjects were restudied during a 6- to 12-month follow-up period after optimizing therapy. At baseline, all natriuretic peptides and LVEF correlated positively with NYHA class (P <.005). Plasma BNP, however, correlated best with NYHA class. At follow-up, only changes of BNP correlated to changes of NYHA class (P =.04). BNP decreased (-45% +/- 12%, N = 14, P =.002) in subjects whose NYHA class improved whereas BNP remained unchanged (-1% +/- 10%, N = 25, P =.95) in those whose NYHA class was stable. CONCLUSIONS: This investigation demonstrates the superiority of plasma BNP as compared to ANP and LVEF in objectively assessing NYHA class during the chronic treatment of CHF. Given that clinical assessment of CHF is subjective, plasma BNP is a useful objective biomarker in monitoring human CHF in the outpatient setting.

Differential actions of vasopeptidase inhibition versus angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition on diuretic therapy in experimental congestive heart failure.

BACKGROUND: Omapatrilat (OMA), a vasopeptidase inhibitor, simultaneously inhibits angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) and neutral endopeptidase, which degrades vasodilatory factors (eg, ADM) and natriuretic peptides. Based on the beneficial cardiorenal and humoral properties of the natriuretic peptides, we hypothesized that an acute vasopeptidase inhibitor with or without diuretic would result in more favorable cardiorenal and hormonal actions than ACE inhibition plus diuretic (ACEI+D) in congestive heart failure. METHODS AND RESULTS: We compared the actions of OMA alone and with diuretic (OMA+D) to ACEI+D in a model of pacing-induced congestive heart failure. OMA+D decreased pulmonary arterial and pulmonary capillary wedge pressures to a greater level than OMA alone or ACEI+D. Glomerular filtration rate was lower with ACEI+D than with either OMA group. Plasma renin activity and aldosterone immediately increased with ACEI+D, whereas OMA+D resulted in higher plasma renin activity and a delayed increase in aldosterone. OMA alone did not increase plasma renin activity and aldosterone, but resulted in a sustained increase in plasma adrenomedullin, with higher urinary atrial natriuretic peptide, adrenomedullin, and cGMP excretions than with ACEI+D. CONCLUSIONS: Acute administration of OMA with or without diuretic results in more favorable cardiorenal and humoral responses in experimental congestive heart failure than does ACEI+D. There is no acute activation of renin and aldosterone with OMA alone such as occurs with ACEI+D and OMA+D. Thus, OMA with or without a diuretic possesses beneficial cardiorenal and humoral actions comparable to those observed with ACEI+D that can be explained by potentiation of natriuretic peptides.