A comparison of clinical characteristics, radiographic findings, and outcomes of bihemispheric versus unihemispheric gunshot wounds to the head.

INTRODUCTION: Unihemispheric head gunshot wound (HGSW) are associated with improved survival; however, specific clinical and radiographic characteristics associated with survival have not been clearly defined. To further guide prognosis estimates and care discussions, this study aims to identify unihemispheric HGSWs injury patterns; comparing them to bihemispheric HGSWs characterizing factors associated with improved clinical outcomes and survival. METHODS: Patients presenting to our Level 1 trauma center from January 2013 through May 2019 with HGSW injury were reviewed. Patients were grouped into those with unihemispheric versus bihemispheric HGSWs and survivors versus non-survivors. Clinical variables and head computed tomography (CT) features were compared using comparative statistics. RESULTS: 62 HGSW patients met study criteria (unihemispheric = 33, bihemispheric = 29). Regardless of injury type, avoidance of injury to multiple lobes, temporal, parietal and basal ganglia brain regions and intracranial vascular injury were also associated with survival (p < 0.05). Lower admission GCS score and lower motor GCS score was associated with reduced survival in unihemispheric HGSW injury (p < 0.05). Unihemispheric HGSW survivors demonstrated improved clinical outcomes, with reduced hospital length of stay (5 days vs. 47 days, p = 0.014) and intensive care unit length of stay (3 days vs. 20 days, p = 0.021) and more favorable disposition location. CONCLUSION: We found presenting clinical features and CT imaging patterns previously associated with improved survival in HGSW patients is similar in unihemispheric specific injuries. Importantly, a more favorable admission GCS score may portend survivability in unihemsipheric HGSW. Furthermore, unihemispheric HGSW survivors may have improved clinical outcomes, length of stay and disposition location.

Periappendiceal abscess mimicking appendiceal cancer.

Appendiceal cancer was strongly suspected in this case because of its unique colonoscopic, radiologic, and intraoperative presentation. Hence, laparoscopic enbloc right hemicolectomy and peritonectomy were performed. The diagnosis of periappendiceal abscess was confirmed later after the operation. Appendiceal disease is hard to differentiate because of the wide spectrum of differential diagnosis. So, when there is a strong suspicion of appendiceal cancer, laparoscopic right colectomy, which is minimally invasive and potentially curative can be the treatment of choice.