Effects of immersive virtual reality for managing anxiety, nausea and vomiting among paediatric cancer patients receiving their first chemotherapy: An exploratory randomised controlled trial.

PURPOSE: To assess the feasibility and acceptability of immersive virtual reality for managing anxiety, nausea and vomiting amongst paediatric patients with cancer receiving their first chemotherapy. METHODS: An exploratory randomised control trial supplemented with qualitative interviews was conducted to enrol Chinese paediatric patients receiving their first intravenous chemotherapy. Participants were randomly assigned to intervention (three immersive virtual reality sessions) or control (standard care) groups. The main outcome measures included (1) feasibility parameters; (2) anxiety, nausea and vomiting; and (3) satisfaction with the chemotherapy procedures. Qualitative data were collected by semi-structured individual interviews with patients, parents and nurses. RESULTS: A total of 19 patients, 19 accompanying parents and 9 nurses were recruited. Results suggested that the intervention was feasible as evidenced by the high consent rate, low withdrawal rate and attrition rate. The intervention group showed significantly better improvement in anxiety at T2 [Hedges' effect size, ES = 1.25, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.22-2.17)] and T4 [ES = 1.87, 95% CI: 0.72-2.85], as well as greater reduction in acute nausea at T4 [ES = 0.97, 95% CI: 0.02-1.87] than the control group. Qualitative data yielded three categories including positive experiences and perceived benefits of the intervention, and suggested improvements. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated the potential effectiveness, feasibility and acceptability of immersive virtual reality for managing anxiety and acute nausea amongst paediatric patients with cancer receiving their first chemotherapy.

Caregiving burden and sleep quality amongst family caregivers of Chinese male patients with advanced cancer: A cross-sectional study.

PURPOSE: To examine the level of caregiving burden and sleep quality as well as their interrelationship amongst family caregivers of Chinese male patients with advanced cancer. METHOD: A cross-sectional study was conducted in Hong Kong. The Caregiver Reaction Assessment (CRA) and the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) were used to measure caregiving burden and sleep quality of the family caregivers. RESULTS: A total of 96 family caregivers were recruited. Disrupted schedule (3.8; SD = 0.8) was rated as the most affected consequence of caregiving burden. Around 78.1% of the caregivers suffered from sleep problems. Hierarchical multiple regression revealed that health problems due to caregiving burden was independently associated with poor sleep quality after controlling for socio-demographic characteristics of both patients and caregivers (regression coefficient, B = 2.09, P = 0.012). CONCLUSIONS: Caregiving burden amongst family caregivers of male patients with advanced cancer was remarkably high and associated with poor sleep quality. Strategies aiming to alleviate caregiving burden of caregivers may help break this vicious cycle to enhance the sleep quality of caregivers. Results also underscore the need to assess and develop intervention to relieve caregiving burden for family caregivers of cancer patients.