Safety and efficacy of robotic anti-reflux surgery in geriatric patients: a comparative analysis.

INTRODUCTION: As our population ages, older adults are being considered for anti-reflux surgery (ARS). Geriatric patients typically have heightened surgical risk, and literature has shown mixed results regarding postoperative outcomes. We sought to evaluate the safety and efficacy of robotic ARS in the geriatric population. METHODS: We conducted a single-institution review of ARS procedures performed between 2009 and 2023. Patients ≥ 65 were assigned to the geriatric cohort. We compared operative details, lengths of stay (LOS), readmissions, reoperations, and complications between the two cohorts. The gastroesophageal reflux disease health-related quality of life (GERD-HRQL) survey and review of clinic notes were used to evaluate ARS efficacy. RESULTS: 628 patients were included, with 190 in the geriatric cohort. This cohort had a higher frequency of diabetes (16.3% vs 5.9% p < 0.0001), hypertension (50.0% vs 21.5% p < 0.0001), and heart disease (17.9% vs 2.3% p < 0.0001). Geriatric patients were more likely to exhibit hiatal hernias on imaging (51.6% vs 34.2% p < 0.0001) and were more likely to have large hernias (30.0% vs 7.1% p < 0.0001). Older adults were more likely to undergo Toupet fundoplications (58.4% vs 41.3%, p < 0.0001), Collis gastroplasties (9.5% vs 2.7% p < 0.0001), and relaxing incisions (11.6% vs 1.4% p < 0.0001). Operative time was longer for geriatric patients (132.0 min vs 104.5 min p < 0.0001). There were no significant differences in LOS, readmissions, or reoperations between cohorts. Geriatric patients exhibited lower rates of complications (7.4% vs. 14.6%, p = 0.011), but similar complication grades. Both groups had significant reduction in symptom scores from preoperative values. There were no significant differences in the reported symptoms between cohorts at any follow-up timepoint. CONCLUSION: Geriatric robotic ARS patients tend to do as well as younger adults regarding postoperative and symptomatic outcomes, despite presenting with larger hiatal hernias and shorter esophagi. Clinicians should be aware of possible need for lengthening procedures or relaxing incisions in this population.

Radioactive iodine administration is not associated with improved disease-specific survival in classic papillary thyroid carcinoma greater than 4 cm confined to the thyroid.

BACKGROUND: We aimed to evaluate the impact of radioactive iodine on disease-specific survival in intrathyroidal (N0M0) papillary thyroid carcinoma >4 cm, given conflicting data in the American Thyroid Association guidelines regarding their management. METHODS: The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database was queried for N0M0 classic papillary thyroid carcinoma >4 cm. Kaplan-Meier estimates were performed to compare disease-specific survival between radioactive iodine-treated and untreated groups. A multivariable Cox regression was performed to identify predictors of disease-specific survival. RESULTS: There were more patients aged ≥55 (41.7% vs 32.3%, P = .001) and fewer multifocal tumors (25.3% vs 30.6%, P = .006) in the no radioactive iodine group. Ten-year disease-specific survival was similar between the radioactive iodine treated and untreated groups (97.2% vs 95.6%, P = .34). Radioactive iodine was not associated with a significant disease-specific survival benefit (adjusted hazard ratio = 0.78, confidence interval [0.39-1.58], P = .49). Age ≥55 (adjusted hazard ratio = 3.50, confidence interval [1.69-7.26], P = .001) and larger tumor size (adjusted hazard ratio = 1.04, confidence interval [1.02-1.06], P < .001) were associated with an increased risk of disease-specific death. Subgroup analyses did not demonstrate improved disease-specific survival with radioactive iodine in patients ≥55 and in tumors >5 cm. CONCLUSION: Adjuvant radioactive iodine administration in classic papillary thyroid carcinoma >4 cm confined to the thyroid did not significantly impact disease-specific survival. Thus, these patients may not require routine treatment with adjuvant radioactive iodine.

Low Mitotic Activity in Papillary Thyroid Cancer: A Marker for Aggressive Features and Recurrence.

CONTEXT: The significance of low mitotic activity in papillary thyroid cancer (PTC) is largely undefined. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to determine the behavioral landscape of PTC with low mitotic activity compared to that of no- and high-mitotic activity. METHODS: A single-institution consecutive series of PTC patients from 2018-2022 was reviewed. Mitotic activity was defined as no mitoses, low (1-2 mitoses/2 mm2) or high (≥3 mitoses/2 mm2) per the World Health Organization. The 2015 American Thyroid Association risk stratification was applied to the cohort, and clinicopathologic features were compared between groups. For patients with ≥6 months follow-up, Cox regression analyses for recurrence were performed. RESULTS: 640 PTCs were included - 515 (80.5%) no mitotic activity, 110 (17.2%) low mitotic activity, and 15 (2.3%) high mitotic activity. Overall, low mitotic activity exhibited rates of clinicopathologic features including vascular invasion, gross extrathyroidal extension, and lymph node metastases in between those of no- and high-mitotic activity. PTCs with low mitotic activity had higher rates of intermediate- and high-risk ATA risk stratification compared to those with no mitotic activity (p < 0.001). Low mitotic activity PTCs also had higher recurrence rates (15.5% vs. 4.5%, p < 0.001). Low mitotic activity was associated with recurrence, independent of the ATA risk stratification (HR 2.96; 95% CI 1.28-6.87, p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Low mitotic activity is relatively common in PTC and its behavior lies within a spectrum between no- and high-mitotic activity. Given its association with aggressive clinicopathologic features and recurrence, low mitotic activity should be considered when risk stratifying PTC patients for recurrence.

Clinical utility of a microRNA classifier in cytologically indeterminate thyroid nodules with RAS mutations: A multi-institutional study.

BACKGROUND: Molecular testing guides the management of cytologically indeterminate thyroid nodules. We evaluated the real-world clinical benefit of a commercially available thyroid mutation panel plus microRNA risk classifier in classifying RAS-mutated nodules. METHODS: We performed a subgroup analysis of the results of molecular testing of Bethesda III/IV nodules using the ThyGenX/ThyGeNEXT-ThyraMIR platform at 3 tertiary-care centers between 2017 and 2021, defining a positive result as 10% or greater risk of malignancy. RESULTS: We identified 387 nodules from 375 patients (70.7% female, median age 59.3 years) who underwent testing. Positive nodules (32.3%) were associated with increased surgical intervention (74.4% vs 14.9%, P < .0001) and carcinoma on surgical pathology (46.4% vs 3.4%, P < .0001) compared to negative modules. RAS mutations were the most common mutations, identified in 71 of 380 (18.7%) nodules, and were classified as ThyraMIR- (28 of 71; 39.4%) or ThyraMIR+ (43 of 71; 60.6%). Among RAS-mutated nodules, there was no significant difference in operative rate (P = .2212) or carcinoma diagnosis (P = .6277) between the ThyraMIR+ and ThyraMIR- groups, and the sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value, and positive predictive value of ThyraMIR were 64.7%, 34.8%, 40.0%, and 59.5%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Although testing positive is associated with malignancy in surgical pathology, the ThyraMIR classifier failed to differentiate between benign and malignant RAS-mutated nodules. Diagnostic lobectomy should be considered for RAS-mutated nodules, regardless of microRNA expression status.

Treatment of Secondary Hyperparathyroidism and Posttransplant Tertiary Hyperparathyroidism.

INTRODUCTION: Secondary hyperparathyroidism (sHPT) is prevalent in dialysis patients and can lead to tertiary hyperparathyroidism (tHPT) after kidney transplantation. We aimed to assess the association of pretransplant sHPT treatment on posttransplant outcomes. METHODS: We reviewed kidney transplant patients treated with parathyroidectomy or cinacalcet for sHPT. We compared patients biochemical and clinical parameters, and outcomes based on sHPT treatment. RESULTS: A total of 41 patients were included: 18 patients underwent parathyroidectomy and 23 patients received cinacalcet prior to transplantation. There were no significant differences between demographics, comorbidities, allograft characteristics or pre-sHPT intervention parathyroid hormone (PTH) and calcium levels. Patients that underwent parathyroidectomy were on dialysis for longer, although not significantly (71.9 versus 42.3 mo, P = 0.051). At time of transplantation, patients treated by parathyroidectomy had increased rates of controlled sHPT (88.9%; 16/18 versus 47.8%; 11/23, P = 0.008). Patients treated by parathyroidectomy had decreased development of tHPT (5.9%; 1/17; versus 42.1%; 8/19, P = 0.020) as well as decreased rates of posttransplant treatment with cinacalcet (11.1%; 2/18 versus 52.2%; 12/23, P = 0.008). Three patients treated with cinacalcet underwent parathyroidectomy after transplantation. Median PTH after transplant remained lower in patients treated by parathyroidectomy prior to transplant compared to those treated with cinacalcet (60.7 [interquartile range 39.7-133.4] versus 170.0 [interquartile range 128.4-292.7], P = 0.001). Allograft function and survival were similar for parathyroidectomy and cinacalcet, with median follow-up after transplantation of 56.7 and 34.2 mo, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: sHPT treated by parathyroidectomy is associated with controlled PTH levels at transplantation and decreased rates of tHPT. Long-term outcomes should be studied on a larger scale.

Perineural Invasion in Papillary Thyroid Cancer: A Rare Indicator of Aggressive Disease.

BACKGROUND: Perineural invasion (PNI) is associated with aggressive tumor behavior, increased locoregional recurrence, and decreased survival in many carcinomas. However, the significance of PNI in papillary thyroid cancer (PTC) is incompletely characterized. METHODS: Patients diagnosed with PTC and PNI from 2010-2020 at a single, academic center were identified and matched using a 1:2 scheme to patients without PNI based on gross extrathyroidal extension (ETE), nodal metastasis, positive margins, and tumor size (±4 cm). Mixed and fixed effects models were used to analyze the association of PNI with extranodal extension (ENE)-a surrogate marker of poor prognosis. RESULTS: In total, 78 patients were included (26 with PNI, 52 without PNI). Both groups had similar demographics and ultrasound characteristics preoperatively. Central compartment lymph node dissection was performed in most patients (71%, n = 55), and 31% (n = 24) underwent a lateral neck dissection. Patients with PNI had higher rates of lymphovascular invasion (50.0% vs. 25.0%, p = 0.027), microscopic ETE (80.8% vs. 44.0%, p = 0.002), and a larger burden [median 5 (interquartile range [IQR] 2-13) vs. 2 (1-5), p = 0.010] and size [median 1.2 cm (IQR 0.6-2.6) vs. 0.4 (0.2-1.4), p = 0.008] of nodal metastasis. Among patients with nodal metastasis, those with PNI had an almost fivefold increase in ENE [odds ratio [OR] 4.9 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.5-16.5), p = 0.008] compared with those without PNI. More than a quarter (26%) of all patients had either persistent or recurrent disease over follow-up (IQR 16-54 months). CONCLUSIONS: PNI is a rare, pathologic finding that is associated with ENE in a matched cohort. Additional investigation into PNI as a prognostic feature in PTC is warranted.