Data Driven Competitive Motivation Strategies in a Longitudinal Simulation Curriculum for Trauma Team Training.

OBJECTIVE: A novel approach to trauma team simulation was used to enhance team performance in a cohort of general surgical residents. We implemented data driven debriefing using performance report cards and video footage of the simulations. We wanted to evaluate the technical and nontechnical skills developed by teams using this approach. DESIGN: All surgical residents in an academic program were divided into 5 equal "trauma teams". Throughout the academic year, each team took part in 4 standardized, high fidelity trauma simulations. Rubrics to assess technical efficiency were scored. Each team received individualized feedback in the form of report cards following each simulation. Video recordings of each simulation were analyzed by blinded raters using a validated instrument to assess nontechnical skills/Crisis Resource Management (CRM) skills. SETTING: An academic level 1 trauma hospital in Canada. RESULTS: Five teams comprising five residents participated in four simulations each. Learner feedback was universally positive and learning during simulation was rated higher than learning during didactic lecture. The effect of data driven report cards and anonymized ranking was cited by trainees as a motivating factor to improve. CRM scores improved over the course of the academic year for all teams but without reaching statistical significance. A strong positive correlation was measured between technical and CRM skills for all teams. CONCLUSIONS: Adding data driven debriefing using performance report cards that assess both technical and CRM skills to a trauma team curriculum is a feasible and acceptable way to influence trainee performance using positive competitive motivation. More data are required to confirm the early patterns of improvement uncovered in CRM scoring. A positive correlation between technical skills and CRM skills raises important questions for future research.

Are retrievable vena cava filters placed in trauma patients really retrievable?

PURPOSE: Concerns have arisen regarding the use of retrievable inferior vena cava filters (rIVCFs) in trauma patients due to increasing reports of low retrieval rates. We hypothesized that complete follow-up with a dedicated trauma nurse practitioner would be associated with a higher rate of retrievability. This study was undertaken to determine the rate of retrievability of rIVCFs placed in a Canadian Lead Trauma Centre, and to compare the rate of retrievability in our trauma population to our non-trauma patients. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study of all patients with rIVCF placed between Jan 1 2000 and June 30 2014. Data were collected on demographics, indication for filter placement, retrieval status, and reasons for non-retrieval. Comparison was made between trauma patients and non-trauma patients. RESULTS: A total of 374 rIVCFs were placed (61 in trauma patients and 313 in non-trauma patients) and follow-up was complete for the entire cohort. Filter retrieval was achieved in 86.9 % of trauma patients. Reasons for non-retrieval were technical in two patients, and death before retrieval in six patients. Retrieval was successful in 48.9 % of non-trauma patients. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that rIVCFs can be successfully retrieved amongst trauma patients. We demonstrated a higher rate of successful retrieval amongst trauma patients than non-trauma patients in our institution. Careful patient follow-up may play a role in successful retrieval of rIVCFs.