RESUMO
Introduction/Purpose: The routine mid-trimester fetal anatomy ultrasound (FAS) is offered to every pregnant woman and remains critical in the detection of structural fetal anomalies. Our study aimed to determine the prevalence of abnormalities on routine FAS performed by a single operator, who is an experienced sub-specialist in maternal-fetal medicine. Methods: A retrospective analysis of all routine FAS performed a tertiary private obstetric ultrasound practice in metropolitan Sydney over a 7-year period, August 2015-July 2022. An advanced ultrasound protocol including detailed cardiac views was used in every case. Second opinion scans for suspected abnormalities were excluded. Fetal anomalies were classified into major and minor, based on the likely need for neonatal intervention. Results: Among 14,908 obstetric ultrasound examinations, routine FAS were performed on 3172 fetuses by a single operator. More than 99% of women had screened low-risk for fetal aneuploidy. Structural anomalies were identified in 5% (157/3172) of fetuses; the prevalence of major anomalies was 1% (30/3172). Almost 60% of total anomalies were either cardiac or renal. No differences were identified in anomaly rates for singletons compared with twins (5.0% vs. 4.2%; P = 0.75). The prevalence of placenta previa and vasa previa was 10% and 0.1%, respectively. Discussion: The prevalence of fetal anomalies on routine FAS by a single operator using a standardised protocol was higher in our practice (5%) than in previously published studies. Although most anomalies were minor, the rate of major abnormality was 1%. Conclusion: The routine mid-trimester FAS remains an integral component of prenatal ultrasound screening.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Although specialised clinics for multiple pregnancies are recommended by several Obstetrics and Gynaecology governing bodies, studies examining outcome before and after introduction of such clinics remain few, were performed predominantly in North America in the 1990s, and either amongst dichorionic twin pregnancies only or where chorionicity was not specified. Our objective, in the modern setting with twins of known chorionicity, was to compare maternal and neonatal outcomes of twin pregnancies before and after commencement of a consultant-led, multidisciplinary twins clinic (TC). METHODS: Retrospective cohort study of 513 women, with birth of twins at ≥20 weeks' gestation, January 2007 to November 2011, at a metropolitan tertiary maternity hospital, Sydney, Australia. Demographic, pregnancy, and outcome data were obtained from hospital databases. Women receiving TC care (2009-2011) were compared to those receiving general antenatal clinic (ANC) care (2007-2010) and private care (2009-2011). Other models of care were excluded. Main outcome measures were total maternal inpatient stay, mode of birth, gestational age at birth, and neonatal nursery admission. RESULTS: 286 women were included in the main analyses: 84 attended ANC, 101 TC, and 101 a private obstetrician. TC women had similar demographics to ANC women and were slightly younger than private patients. TC women had lower Caesarean section rates (55% vs. 70% ANC and 76% private, p = 0.008) and fewer late preterm (34 + 0-36 + 6 weeks) births, (26%TC vs. 44% ANC and 41% private, p < 0.001). Median maternal inpatient stay was shorter in TC than ANC (7 vs. 8 days, p = 0.009) and similar to private (7 days). Nursery admission rates were higher in private patients (67% vs. 49% ANC and 47% TC, p = 0.001) and average birthweight lower (2283 g vs. 2501 g ANC and 2496 g TC, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Within a single centre, maternal and neonatal twin pregnancy outcomes varied significantly by model of care. Introducing a specialised twins clinic in our setting decreased Caesarean section rates, late preterm birth, and inpatient stay compared to ANC.
