Implications of cage impactions in single-level OLIF treatment of degenerative spondylolisthesis.

INTRODUCTION: Cage impactions (CI) of Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion (OLIF) appear to be a frequent mechanical complication with a potential functional impact. OBJECTIVES: To determine the rate of CI occurrence, their risk factors and clinical implications in the case of combined single-level arthrodesis. METHOD: A retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data was performed. All our patients with degenerative spondylolisthesis initially underwent OLIF combined with pedicle screw fixation (PSF). Intraoperative control with an image intensifier and a standard radiograph in the immediate postoperative period made it possible to assess the occurrence of CI, depending on the position of the implant. Secondary subsidence was sought on the standing radiological examination using EOS biplanar radiography during follow-up. The pelvic parameters were analyzed, as well as the occurrence of bone fusion. The clinical evaluation was made at≥1 year, by the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), the walking distance (WD) and the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). RESULTS: In all, 130 patients out of the 131 included were analyzed. A CI occurred in 25.3% (n=33) of cases and of these, 94% (n=32) occurred intraoperatively. Postmenopausal women had more CI with an odds ratio (OR) of 5.8 (P=0.034). The "CI" group had a 9.5% lower ODI score than the "non-CI" group (P=0.0040), but both provided excellent ODI gains of 30.8±16 and 32.9±15.5% (P<0.0001). An "anterior" position of the implant allowed a greater gain in lumbar lordosis (P<0.001) but was associated with greater CI occurrence (P<0.001), with an OR of 6.75 (P=0.0018). CONCLUSION: The occurrence of intraoperative cage impaction is a frequent event when performing OLIF. Postmenopausal women have an approximately 6 times greater risk of impaction than men, and patients with an "anterior" implant placement have a 7 times greater risk than with central placement. The negative impact of cage impactions on the clinical score (ODI) was significant after one year of follow-up. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV, non-comparative cohort study.

Posterior hinge fixation for the treatment of unstable traumatic sacroiliac joint injuries.

INTRODUCTION: Posterior hinge fixation (PHF) is a sacroiliac joint fixation method indicated for the surgical treatment of unstable pelvic ring fractures (tile C). HYPOTHESIS: PHF yields good functional outcomes based on the Majeed score at more than 1 year of follow-up. METHODS: A single-center, retrospective study of patients who had a Tile C pelvic ring fracture, who were operated by PHF and who were evaluated at a minimum follow-up of 1 year. The functional outcome was determined using the Majeed score and pain was evaluated by the patients using a visual analog scale (VAS). The preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative data, complications and sequelae were documented. A CT-scan was done at least 1 year after the surgical treatment to determine the SI joint's reduction and fusion. RESULTS: Included were 22 patients (59% men) who had a mean age of 37.3±11.9 years; 21 of these patients were reviewed at a mean of 4.8±4 years. The mean Majeed score at the final assessment was 76.4 points±15.3, with 24% of patients having excellent results (n=5), 53% having good results (n=11), 19% having average results (n=4) and 5% having poor results (n=1). The mean pain level on VAS was 28±23mm. Of the eight surgical site infections, seven occurred in the PHF (88%). CT-scans taken at 1 year postoperative were compared to the preoperative scans. The pelvic opening was reduced by -9±6 (p<0.01), SI diastasis by -11mm±9 (p<0.001), vertical displacement by-7mm±8 (p<0.001), symphysis opening by -15mm±15 (p<0.001), median transverse diameter by -10mm±9 (p<0.001) and bispinal diameter by -5mm±7 (p<0.001). SI fusion was confirmed in 43% of patients (n=9). CONCLUSION: PHF is a surgical instrumentation method that provides satisfactory long-term reduction of Tile C pelvic ring fractures. The clinical outcomes are good or excellent in 77% of cases. The perioperative morbidity is marked by surgical site infections, all of which healed. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV; retrospective, non-comparative cohort study.

Minimally invasive unilateral lumbar interbody fusion (UNILIF) in over-80-year-olds. Continuous series of 42 patients at 1.4 years' follow-up.

INTRODUCTION: In lumbar stenosis, surgery aims to improve quality of life in increasingly elderly patients. Minimally invasive techniques better suit the requirements of elderly patients with increasing functional demand. HYPOTHESIS: The UNILIF unilateral lumbar interbody fusion technique improves functional scores at 1 year in over-80 year-olds, with low morbidity. METHOD: Patients undergoing minimally invasive decompression with transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) associated to unilateral pedicle screwing for degenerative lumbar stenosis were analyzed at a minimum 1 year's follow-up. SF12, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and Quebec scores and sagittal spinopelvic radiographic parameters were assessed at follow-up. Surgical and general complications were also collated. RESULTS: In all, 42 patients (64.3% female; mean age, 83.7±2.9 years) were treated by UNILIF at levels L2-L3 (3.8%), L3-L4 (15.4%), L4-L5 (71.2%) and L5-S1 (9.6%). Mean follow-up was 520±226 days (range, 340-1166 days). Mean preoperative SF12 score was 77.5±10.9, with significant improvement at last follow-up: 81.9±138 (p<0.05). Mean preoperative ODI was 44.4%±14.0, with significant improvement at last follow-up: 32.4%±13.3 (p<0.001). Mean preoperative Quebec score was 42.9±19.9, with significant improvement at last follow-up: 28.5±21.9 (p<0.001). Spinopelvic sagittal balance was not affected by the UNILIF procedure. There were no cases of infection or severe general complications during follow-up, although 2 cases of non-union required revision surgery. CONCLUSION: Lumbar stenosis surgery by UNILIF improved functional scores at 1 year, with low morbidity. It is a suitable strategy for degenerative lumbar stenosis in elderly patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV, non-comparative cohort study.