Improving Self-Perceived Competencies of Second Year Pharmacy Students through an Introductory Medication Reconciliation Rotation.

OBJECTIVE: Medication reconciliation (MedRec) is an essential healthcare function particularly relevant to pharmacists' expertise and a learning opportunity for pharmacy students. Our objective was to assess change across clinical competence, confidence, and communication skills after completion of a medication reconciliation (MedRec) rotation by second year pharmacy students. METHODS: A retrospective post-then-pre survey including 29 questions was developed/delivered to students following the completion of required MedRec hours. The primary endpoint was the change in three domains via summed scores from individual questions. Cohen's difference (d) was used to determine group-effect size change. Secondary endpoints included individual question change, perceived patient impact, and subgroup analyses. RESULTS: Of 115 P2 students, 81.7% (n=94) participated in the study. Students self-reported increases on the Likert Scale (0-10) of 2.49±1.90 in clinical competency domain (p<.001, d=1.52), 3.57±2.13 in confidence domain (p<.001, d=1.13), and 3.12±2.15 in communication skills domain (p<.001, d=1.57), representing large group-effect changes across all three. Twenty-one of the 22 individual questions had large group-effect changes; one question (nursing communications) had a moderate group-effect change. Student perception of MedRec impact on patient care (Likert Scale 0-10) was positive: post-rotation score 7.39±1.57. CONCLUSION: To our knowledge, this is the first larger-scale study that examines student-evaluated outcomes of a MedRec-based rotation. Students self-reported high levels of post-rotation competency across all domains; students from ethnic minorities and with less work/MedRec experience increased their lower pre-rotation scores to statistically similar post-rotation scores, compared to non-minority and more experienced peers. Further study of the model and outcomes is advised.

A progress assessment to evaluate pharmacy students' knowledge prior to beginning advanced pharmacy practice experiences.

OBJECTIVE: To develop an assessment that would (1) help doctor of pharmacy (PharmD) students review therapeutic decision making and build confidence in their skills, (2) provide pharmacy practice residents with the opportunity to lead small group discussions, and (3) provide the assessment committee with program-level assessment data. DESIGN: A case-based interactive assessment was developed and delivered to PharmD students immediately prior to advanced pharmacy practice experiences (APPEs). The assessment used an audience response system to allow immediate feedback followed by small group discussions led by pharmacy-practice residents. Students self-assessed their knowledge and confidence levels and developed personalized learning objectives for APPEs. ASSESSMENT: Eighty-nine percent of students found the assessment useful, and pharmacy practice residents reported that it was helpful in developing precepting skills. The college assessment committee was able to use the data to supplement the ongoing College curricular mapping process. CONCLUSIONS: An interactive assessment process can help students build confidence for experiential training, provide a learning opportunity for pharmacy residents, and produce program-level data for college assessment purposes. Planned modifications of the assessment include expanding the content areas covered and adding ability-based assessments such as communication skills.

Partner for Promotion: an innovative advanced community pharmacy practice experience.

OBJECTIVES: To implement the Partner for Promotion (PFP) program which was designed to enhance the skills and confidence of students and community pharmacy preceptors to deliver and expand advanced patient care services in community pharmacies and also to assess the program's impact. DESIGN: A 10-month longitudinal community advanced pharmacy practice experience was implemented that included faculty mentoring of students and preceptors via formal orientation; face-to-face training sessions; online monthly meetings; feedback on service development materials; and a web site offering resources and a discussion board. Pre- and post-APPE surveys of students and preceptors were used to evaluate perceptions of knowledge and skills. ASSESSMENT: The skills survey results for the first 2 years of the PFP program suggest positive changes occurring from pre- to post-APPE survey in most areas for both students and preceptors. Four of the 7 pharmacies in 2005-2006 and 8 of the 14 pharmacies in 2006-2007 were able to develop an advanced patient care service and begin seeing patients prior to the conclusion of the APPE. As a result of the PFP program from 2005-2007, 14 new experiential sites entered into affiliation agreements with The Ohio State University College of Pharmacy. CONCLUSION: The PFP program offers an innovative method for community pharmacy faculty members to work with students and preceptors in community pharmacies in developing patient care services.