Hepatic artery pseudoaneurysms arising from within a hepatocellular carcinoma.

We report a case of a 70-year-old man with a large hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) containing two pseudoaneurysms measuring up to 2 cm in diameter. The pseudoaneurysms and part of the HCC were supplied by branches from the middle colic artery, which arises from the superior mesenteric artery. This complex arterial vasculature was visualised on CT and confirmed with conventional angiography.

Recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma after liver transplantation mimicking post-transplantation lymphoproliferative disorder.

Approximately 5% of patients with end-stage cirrhosis undergoing orthotopic liver transplantation have occult hepatocellular carcinoma. Careful follow up is required to detect recurrent tumour, and knowledge of the patterns of recurrence may avoid diagnostic confusion with other malignancies, such as post-transplantation lymphoproliferative disorder. This case report illustrates an unusual presentation of recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma in a 56-year-old man presenting with a para-aortic soft tissue mass, thought clinically and radiologically to represent lymphoma or post-transplantation lymphoproliferative disorder. This case demonstrates that recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma can present late after transplantation as retroperitoneal lymphadenopathy, and should alert physicians and radiologists to be aware of the radiological appearances of recurrence and of the need for early biopsy to avoid diagnostic confusion with other malignancies.

Radiological percutaneous gastrostomy.

Long-term gastrostomy tubes have a widely accepted role in providing nutritional support. Traditionally, they have been placed by surgeons and by endoscopists. In the last decade, radiologists have come to play a major role in the placement of gastrostomy and gastrojejunostomy devices, and can usually do so as effectively and at lesser expense. A technique for placement is outlined, with a discussion of patient selection and complications. A review of the literature is provided.

Mesohepatectomy.

BACKGROUND: Formal anatomic (lobar) or extended hepatectomies are recommended for liver malignancies located centrally within the liver (Couinaud's segments IVA, IVB, V, and VIII). Mesohepatectomy, resection of central hepatic segments and leaving the right and left segments in situ, removes large central tumors preserving more functioning liver tissue than either extended left or right hepatectomy. Mesohepatectomy is a seldom used, technically demanding procedure, and its application is yet to be defined. METHODS: Medical charts of 244 consecutive liver resection patients were reviewed retrospectively. Eighteen patients were treated with mesohepatectomy. Six patients had metastatic liver tumor (MLT), 11 had hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), and 1 had gallbladder adenocarcinoma. The operative results were compared with groups of patients treated by lobar hepatectomy (n = 71) and extended left or right hepatectomy (n = 43). RESULTS: The mean mesohepatectomy operative time was 238 versus 304 minutes in the extended group. Inflow occlusion mean time was longer in the mesohepatectomy group than in extended procedures, 45 versus 39 minutes (P = not significant). Comparing the extended hepatectomy group, the mesohepatectomy group had a mean operative estimated blood loss 914 cc versus 1628 cc (P <0.01), postoperative hospital stay 9 versus 16 days (P = 0.054) and volume of resected liver 560cc versus 1500cc (P <0.01) respectively. The late complication rate was lower in the mesohepatectomy group than in the extended group and was comparable to the lobar hepatectomy group (P = 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Despite its technical demands, mesohepatectomy should be considered as an alternative to extended hepatectomy for selected patients with primary and secondary hepatic tumors localized in middle liver segments, as its complication rate, postoperative recovery, and preserved liver tissue compare favorably with extended hepatic resection.

Successful renal transplantation with ipsilateral femoral arteriovenous grafts.

BACKGROUND: The choice of location for revascularization of a renal allograft is frequently influenced by the presence of previous pelvic surgery or failed allografts that remain in situ. The presence of polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) loop grafts in the femoral vessels may potentially result in iliac venous hypertension, thereby compromising the function of a renal allograft placed nearby. The purpose of this study is to report the hemodynamic changes within the iliac veins as a result of PTFE femoral grafts and report the outcome of renal allografts placed ipsilateral to such grafts. METHODS: THREE patients with a failed renal allograft in the right iliac fossa and functioning left groin PTFE loop grafts underwent left iliac venography and hemodynamic measurements of the iliac venous system. All three patients underwent renal transplantation in the left iliac fossa without ligation or alteration of the loop graft. Standard clinical data were collected after transplantation. RESULTS: All three patients demonstrated widely patent external iliac and common iliac veins ipsilateral to the loop graft. Elevated pressures measured within the venous limb of the loop graft dissipated rapidly within the common femoral and external iliac veins. All three kidneys were well perfused, as documented by posttransplant technetium 99m-diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid nuclear renography. All three patients have normal renal function past 7 months after transplant, and all three femoral loop grafts are still functioning. CONCLUSIONS: PTFE loop grafts to the femoral vessels are not associated with local venous hypertension in the ipsilateral external iliac veins. Revascularization of a renal allograft may be performed ipsilateral to a femoral loop graft provided other venous diseases, such as strictures, have been excluded.