Is fibromyalgia part of the climacteric syndrome?

Fibromyalgia syndrome (FMS) is a disorder usually affecting middle aged women, who complain of diffuse musculoskeletal aches, pains or stiffness associated with tiredness, anxiety and poor sleep. Neurotransmission disorders linked both to pain perception as well as mood, sleep and cognition modulation are involved in FMS etiopathogenesys. Treatments that may be effective to decrease pain and fatigue include tricyclic antidepressants, dual reuptake inhibitors of serotonin/noradrenalin and pregabalin. The climacteric syndrome is a set of symptoms caused by the decline of ovarian hormone levels, which alters brain neurotransmission and provokes musculoskeletal pains, mood disorders, poor sleep quality and hot flushes. The hormone therapy reverses those symptoms and its risks are marginal if women's own hormones are used through transdermal route. Some antidepressants may be useful for patients with climacteric symptoms. We have found it surprising the epidemiological, etiopathogenic, symptomatic and therapeutic similarity between FMS and climacteric that could lead us to hypothesize that FMS is a part of the climacteric syndrome. However, the existence of FMS non-climacteric patients points out that hormone deficit is not the only physiopathological mechanism involved in this syndrome's etiopathogenesys. Nevertheless, it is likely that hormone disorders are involved in the symptoms genesis of most middle aged women with FMS. Keeping this in mind, we see the point in considering the use of HT in climacteric patients with FMS. Studies assessing the FMS clinical response to HT in a prospective manner and with the current diagnose criteria are still required.

Optimal waist circumference cutoff value for defining the metabolic syndrome in postmenopausal Latin American women.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine an optimal waist circumference (WC) cutoff value for defining the metabolic syndrome (METS) in postmenopausal Latin American women. METHODS: A total of 3,965 postmenopausal women (age, 45-64 y), with self-reported good health, attending routine consultation at 12 gynecological centers in major Latin American cities were included in this cross-sectional study. Modified guidelines of the US National Cholesterol Education Program, Adult Treatment Panel III were used to assess METS risk factors. Receiver operator characteristic curve analysis was used to obtain an optimal WC cutoff value best predicting at least two other METS components. Optimal cutoff values were calculated by plotting the true-positive rate (sensitivity) against the false-positive rate (1 - specificity). In addition, total accuracy, distance to receiver operator characteristic curve, and the Youden Index were calculated. RESULTS: Of the participants, 51.6% (n = 2,047) were identified as having two or more nonadipose METS risk components (excluding a positive WC component). These women were older, had more years since menopause onset, used hormone therapy less frequently, and had higher body mass indices than women with fewer metabolic risk factors. The optimal WC cutoff value best predicting at least two other METS components was determined to be 88 cm, equal to that defined by the Adult Treatment Panel III. CONCLUSIONS: A WC cutoff value of 88 cm is optimal for defining METS in this postmenopausal Latin American series.