Recreational activities of lower-limb amputees with prostheses.

Ninety-two (92) persons with lower-limb amputations who regularly used prostheses responded to a survey that included questions about preferred recreational activities. This article describes the variety of activities selected by these men and women aged 20 to 87 years. Of the activities that were of high importance, 74% to 88% could be performed. Those activities assigned moderate to low importance were less often reported as able to be performed. The activities that require high energy level were more problematic for performance. The diversity of identified activities (n= 166) underscores the value of learning about amputees' activity preferences when making prosthetic prescription decisions.

Quality-of-life assessment in acute, chronic, and cancer pain: a pharmacist's guide.

OBJECTIVE: To describe instrumentation, or measures, available for use in assessing the impact of pain on the quality of life (QOL) of patients, and methods to evaluate the appropriateness of these QOL measures. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE, PSYCHLit, and CANCERLit were searched from 1980 through 1997 to identify QOL instruments that included a pain subscale or pain-related items. DATA SYNTHESIS: Given the high prevalence of chronic diseases or conditions that include pain as a primary or secondary symptom, pharmacists should understand how pain affects the QOL of patients. Over the past two decades, emphasis has increased on developing instruments that assess health-related QOL concerns, including pain. Scores of measures--including utility measures--are available to measure general QOL in patients with conditions involving pain. Condition-specific instruments have also been developed to measure the impact of specific conditions, such as arthritis, on QOL. Guidelines are presented for evaluating QOL instrumentation, and existing measures used to evaluate the QOL of patients with acute and chronic pain are described. Pharmacists can use these guidelines to evaluate the usefulness of existing instruments for assessing the QOL of patients with pain. CONCLUSION: Using QOL measures in everyday practice may assist pharmacists in gaining insight into the effects of pain on their patients' QOL. This information may be useful in developing treatment programs that minimize pain and its associated side effects while maximizing patients' well-being.

Phantom limb, residual limb, and back pain after lower extremity amputations.

This study describes the sensations and pain reported by persons with unilateral lower extremity amputations. Participants (n = 92) were recruited from two hospitals to complete the Prosthesis Evaluation Questionnaire which included questions about amputation related sensations and pain. Using a visual analog scale, participants reported the frequency, intensity, and bothersomeness of phantom limb, residual limb, and back pain and nonpainful phantom limb sensations. A survey of medication use for each category of sensations also was included. Statistical analyses revealed that nonpainful phantom limb sensations were common and more frequent than phantom limb pain. Residual limb pain and back pain were also common after amputation. Back pain surprisingly was rated as more bothersome than phantom limb pain or residual limb pain. Back pain was significantly more common in persons with above knee amputations. These results support the importance of looking at pain as a multidimensional rather than a unidimensional construct. They also suggest that back pain after lower extremity amputation may be an overlooked but very important pain problem warranting additional clinical attention and study.

Issues of importance reported by persons with lower limb amputations and prostheses.

The purpose of this paper is to report prosthesis-related issues of importance that were identified by a diverse group of persons living with lower limb amputations (LLA) and prostheses. These perceptions and themes validate some old assumptions and challenge others, report both common and unusual experiences, and indirectly identify the information level of our respondents concerning prostheses. Persons with LLA were identified from computerized rosters at a level one regional trauma center and at the VA Puget Sound Health Care System-Seattle, Division. Inclusion criteria specified that respondents were to: 1) be one or more years post-unilateral amputation at the Syme's level (ankle disarticulation) or higher, 2) use their prosthesis at least 5 days a week, 3) read English, and 4) be able to provide informed consent. Respondents completed the Prosthesis Evaluation Questionnaire-field version (PEQ) and the standard form (SF)-36, a health status measure. Of 114 persons who agreed to participate, 92 (85% male, mean age 55 years) responded to the questionnaire and graded the personal importance of various characteristics and qualities of their prosthesis. The number of years since their last amputation ranged from 1 to 53 years. Four Themes of Interest were identified from responses to open-ended questions about living with a prosthesis. These themes included the fit of the socket with the residual limb, aspects of the mechanical functioning of the prosthesis, other nonmechanical qualities, and advice about adaptation to life with a prosthesis with support from others. Future research is recommended to adjust aspects of the fit of the prosthesis with the residual limb. Implementing periodic check-up visits could uncover problems and eliminate unnecessary suffering.

Prosthesis evaluation questionnaire for persons with lower limb amputations: assessing prosthesis-related quality of life.

OBJECTIVE: To develop a self-report questionnaire for persons with lower limb amputations who use a prosthesis. The resulting scales were intended to be suitable to evaluate the prosthesis and life with the prosthesis. The conceptual framework was health-related quality of life. DESIGN: Multiple steps of scale development, terminating with test-retest of the Prosthesis Evaluation Questionnaire (PEQ) by mail. SOURCE OF SAMPLE: Records from two Seattle hospitals. PATIENTS: Ninety-two patients with lower limb amputations who varied by age, reason for amputation, years since amputation, and amputation level. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The 10 scales used were 4 prosthesis function scales (Usefulness, Residual Limb Health, Appearance, and Sounds), 2 mobility scales (Ambulation and Transfers), 3 psychosocial scales (Perceived Responses, Frustration, and Social Burden), and 1 Well-being scale. Validation measures were the Medical Outcomes Study Short Form-36, the Social Interaction subscale from the Sickness Impact Profile, and the Profile of Mood States-short form. RESULTS: Nine PEQ scales demonstrated high internal consistency. All met test-retest criteria for comparing group results. Validity was described based on methods used to gather original items, distribution of scores, and comparison of scores with criterion variables. CONCLUSIONS: The PEQ scales displayed good psychometric properties. Future work will assess responsiveness of PEQ scales to changes in prosthetic components. We conclude that they will be useful in evaluation of prosthetic care.

Risk factors for retinal detachment after cataract surgery. A population-based case-control study.

PURPOSE: Previous analyses of Medicare claims data, as well as clinical series, have suggested that performance of neodymium:YAG (Nd:YAG) laser posterior capsulotomy after extracapsular cataract surgery increases significantly the risk of retinal detachment. However, methodologic problems with previous research limit the strength of conclusions that can be drawn from these earlier studies. This study was designed to resolve those methodological limitations while using a population-based approach for assessment of the independent association between the performance of Nd:YAG laser posterior capsulotomy and pseudophakic retinal detachment. METHODS: A nested case-control study was conducted. Medicare beneficiaries who had undergone extracapsular cataract extraction from 1988 to 1990 were identified from a 5% sample of Medicare claims data. Within this cohort, people who were diagnosed or treated for retinal detachment during the years 1988 through 1991 (cases) were identified from Medicare records. Four controls were matched to each case of retinal detachment using an incidence density design. Providers of the patients' cataract and retinal surgery were contacted and asked to provide clinical data for all cases and controls that they had treated. RESULTS: Seven hundred six cases of retinal detachment were originally identified from Medicare records. After exclusions due to ineligibility, a total of 291 cases and 870 matched controls were available for analysis. Conditional logistic regression models showed that a number of factors were associated independently with an excess risk of retinal detachment after cataract surgery. These included Nd:YAG laser capsulotomy (odds ratio [OR] = 3.8; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.4-5.9), a history of retinal detachment (OR = 2.7; 95% CI, 1.2-6.1), a history of lattice degeneration (OR = 6.6; 95% CI, 1.6-27.1), axial length (OR = 1.21/mm; 95% CI, 1.03-1.43), refractive error (OR = 0.92/diopter; 95% CI, 0.88-0.95), and a history of ocular trauma after cataract surgery (OR = 6.1; 95% CI, 4.3-28.2). CONCLUSION: Performance of Nd:YAG laser posterior capsulotomy is associated with a significantly elevated risk of retinal detachment in patients who have undergone extracapsular cataract extraction. Other independent risk factors for retinal detachment include axial length, myopia, posterior capsular rupture during surgery, history of retinal detachment or lattice degeneration, and ocular trauma after cataract surgery.

Reproducibility and responsiveness of the VF-14. An index of functional impairment in patients with cataracts.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the test-retest reliability and responsiveness of the VF-14, which is an index of functional impairment in patient with cataracts. DESIGN: Observational longitudinal study. Patients were enrolled prior to undergoing their first cataract surgery between July 15 and December 15, 1991, and they were followed up for 1 year after surgery. SETTING: Patients were recruited from 72 ophthalmologists' practices in three US cities. PATIENTS: Five hundred fifty-two patients who had undergone a surgical procedure in only one eye by the 4-month postoperative follow-up (responsiveness analyses) and a subset of these (n = 426) who had not subsequently undergone surgery for the second eye by the 12-month postoperative follow-up (reproducibility analyses). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Two health status measures (the VF-14 and the Sickness Impact Profile, two global measures of a patient's trouble and satisfaction with his or her vision, and best corrected visual acuity in each eye. RESULTS: The VF-14 is highly reproducible, with an intraclass correlation coefficient of .79 when patient-rated criteria are used to define stable patients. The intraclass correlation coefficient was lower (.57 to .71) when various measures of visual acuity were used to define stable patients. The VF-14 is also about three times more responsive to a change in vision than the Sickness Impact Profile, which is a generic health status measure (effect size of approximately 1.00 vs 0.30). Estimates of the responsiveness of the VF-14 and the Sickness Impact Profile were not associated with preoperative visual acuity in the operated on or better eye. Responsiveness of the VF-14, however, was higher in patients with greater self-rated trouble with vision preoperatively. CONCLUSIONS: The VF-14 was reproducible in stable patients during an 8-month period, and it was more responsive to clinically significant changes in vision than was a generic health status measure (ie, the Sickness Impact Profile).

Preoperative functional expectations and postoperative outcomes among patients undergoing first eye cataract surgery.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the relationship between patients' preoperative expectations regarding the outcome of cataract surgery and actual postoperative experience. METHODS: A longitudinal study of 772 patients undergoing first eye cataract surgery recruited from 75 ophthalmology practices in three metropolitan areas was conducted. Prior to surgery and approximately 4 months after surgery, a detailed interview was conducted that included general and vision-specific health status measures (including the Visual Function 12-Item Scale [VF-12]), patient-reported level of trouble and satisfaction with vision, and questions addressing patients' preoperative expectations regarding the outcomes of surgery. In addition, detailed clinical data were collected preoperatively and postoperatively. A total of 552 patients had only single eye cataract surgery by 4 months postoperatively and are included in this analysis. RESULTS: Patients' preoperative expectations regarding the impact of cataract surgery were very high and were unrelated to their demographic or ocular characteristics. The preoperative VF-12 score, however, was positively correlated with expected postoperative VF-12 score (Spearman correlation, .45, P < .001). Only 61% of patients achieved or surpassed their expected level of postoperative functioning. The difference between expected and actual postoperative VF-12 scores was not associated with patients' demographic characteristics or provider-related variables. Older patients (> 75 years) and patients with ocular comorbidity had a larger difference between expected and actual postoperative functioning than younger patients and those without ocular comorbidity. CONCLUSION: Expectations regarding visual functioning after cataract surgery are very high, and in most cases such expectations are fulfilled. In selected cases, more comprehensive counseling may reduce the discrepancy between expectations and actual outcomes of cataract surgery.

Comparison of generic versus disease-specific measures of functional impairment in patients with cataract.

The increased demand for health status measures in evaluating medical interventions has increased the importance of clarifying when to use generic versus disease-specific health status measures. The authors compared the performance of a well known generic health status measure, the Sickness Impact Profile (SIP), and a disease-specific measure of functional impairment related to vision (the VF-14) in detecting functional impairment in 426 cataract patients before and at 12 months after first eye cataract surgery. Using analysis of covariance models, the associations were assessed between the SIP and VF-14 and four criterion variables--patient ratings of trouble and satisfaction with their vision and overall health, and best corrected visual acuity--after controlling for patient age and medical comorbidities. Preoperative patient ratings of trouble and satisfaction with vision were significantly associated with VF-14 scores (P < 0.001), but not with SIP scores. Preoperative visual acuity in the better eye was significantly associated with both VF-14 and SIP scores (P < 0.001). Patient general health ratings were significantly associated with SIP scores (P < 0.001), but not with VF-14 scores. Postoperative changes in patient ratings of their vision and in visual acuity were significantly associated with changes in VF-14 scores (P < 0.05), but not with changes in SIP scores. Changes in patient ratings of overall health were significantly associated with changes in SIP scores (P < 0.01), but not with changes in VF-14 scores. In patients undergoing cataract surgery, a disease-specific health status measure is more sensitive to preoperative functional impairment related to vision, and to change in functional impairment after cataract surgery, than is a generic health status measure.

The proximal-distal continuum of multiple health outcome measures: the case of cataract surgery.

This paper presents the concept of a proximal-distal continuum in health outcome measures. It indicates how this continuum can be used in the selection of outcome measures in health technology evaluation studies. Finally, it demonstrates several ways in which the placement of a specific health outcome measure in the proximal-distal continuum determines the overall statistical model of treatment and nontreatment variables. We identify five principles that relate to the above issues. The first three principles state that a larger effect of treatment on health outcomes will be seen when the following occur: 1) more proximal (e.g., signs and symptoms, disease-specific outcomes) measures are examined, 2) the initial illness is more severe; and 3) pretreatment distal (e.g., role functioning, life satisfaction) outcome measures show relatively high impairment. Principle four indicates that distal outcomes are influenced more heavily by external (i.e., nontreatment) factors. Principle five states that a causal chain links each outcome measure in the continuum to the next more distal outcome measure. This last principle enables the determination of indirect relationships between treatment and outcomes. These principles are illustrated with data from a study on the effects of cataract surgery with intraocular lens implantation on patient outcome variables across the proximal-distal continuum.

Variation in ophthalmic testing prior to cataract surgery. Results of a national survey of optometrists. Cataract Patient Outcome Research Team.

OBJECTIVE: To assess variation in optometrists' use of ophthalmic tests in the evaluation of patients being considered for cataract surgery who have no history of other eye disease. DESIGN/PARTICIPANTS: National survey of a systematic sample of practicing members of the American Optometric Association (St Louis, Mo), who had referred at least one patient to an ophthalmologist for consideration of cataract surgery in 1991. RESULTS: Ninety-two of 130 eligible responding optometrists reported that they routinely performed preoperative testing on patients being considered for cataract surgery. Of these 92 optometrists, 91 (99%) frequently or always performed refraction, and 82 (89%) frequently or always performed a dilated fundus examination in their evaluation of patients being considered for cataract surgery who had no history of other eye disease. None of these 92 optometrists reported using B-scan ultrasonography or electroretinograms frequently or always, and few used A-scan ultrasonography or visual evoked responses frequently or always. A substantial percentage frequently or always used formal visual field testing (47%), formal color vision testing (40%), fundus photography (24%), potential acuity measurement (25%), glare testing (23%), contrast sensitivity testing (19%), and specular microscopy (14%), while 11% to 81% of optometrists never performed these tests on such patients. More recent graduation from optometry school was associated with a decreased frequency of use of potential acuity measurement and contrast sensitivity testing and with an increased use of dilated fundus examinations. CONCLUSION: There is a substantial variation in optometrists self-reported use of a number of ophthalmic tests in the preoperative evaluation of patients being considered for cataract surgery who have no history of other eye disease.

National study of cataract surgery outcomes. Variation in 4-month postoperative outcomes as reflected in multiple outcome measures.

BACKGROUND: Although ophthalmologists have long recognized that visual acuity alone is an inadequate measure of visual impairment, the need for and outcomes of cataract surgery historically have been assessed in terms of visual acuity. PURPOSE: To examine the relation among different cataract surgery outcome measures, including a 14-item instrument designed to measure functional impairment caused by cataract (the VF-14), at 4 months after cataract surgery. METHODS: The authors performed a longitudinal study of 552 patients undergoing first eye cataract surgery by 1 of 75 ophthalmologists practicing in Columbus, Ohio, St. Louis, Missouri, or Houston, Texas. Patients were interviewed, and clinical data were obtained preoperatively (July 15, 1991-March 14, 1992) and 4 months postoperatively. RESULTS: The percentage of patients judged to be improved at 4 months after cataract surgery varied by the outcome measure used: Snellen visual acuity (96%); VF-14 score (89%); satisfaction with vision (85%); self-reported trouble with vision (80%); and Sickness Impact Profile score (67%). The change in patients' ratings of their trouble with vision and their satisfaction with vision were correlated more strongly with the change in VF-14 score than with the change in visual acuity (operated eye or better eye). The average change in VF-14 score was unrelated to the preoperative visual acuity in the eye undergoing surgery. CONCLUSION: Estimates of the proportion of patients benefiting from cataract surgery vary with the outcome measure used to measure benefit. Change in VF-14 score, a measure of functional impairment related to vision, may be a better measure of the benefit of cataract surgery than change in visual acuity.

Variation in cataract surgery practice and clinical outcomes.

PURPOSE: To examine associations between surgical technique, patient and surgeon characteristics, and clinical outcomes of cataract surgery. METHODS: Seventy-five ophthalmologists were recruited from three cities based on a sampling scheme stratified by surgeon-reported annual volume of cataract surgery. Seven hundred seventy-two patients undergoing first eye cataract surgery were enrolled, with complete preoperative, perioperative, and 4-month postoperative clinical data on 717 patients (93%). RESULTS: Sixty-five percent of surgery was performed by phacoemulsification and 35% by standard extracapsular (ECCE) techniques. Performance of ECCE was associated with the presence of ocular comorbidity and 21 or more years in practice of the surgeon. Performance of phacoemulsification was associated with annual volume of cataract surgery, wherein high-volume (201-399 patients annually) and very high-volume (> 400 patients annually) surgeons had 3.7 and 3.9 times the likelihood of performing phacoemulsification compared with moderate-volume (51-200 cases annually) surgeons. The rates of intraoperative, perioperative, and 4-month postoperative adverse events and the amount of improvement in visual acuity did not differ either by surgical technique or volume stratum. The reported occurrence of posterior capsular opacification within 4 months of surgery was increased in the presence of cortical opacification, one city, and patients operated on by either high- or very high-volume surgeons. CONCLUSIONS: In this cohort, no difference in clinical outcomes, as measured by change in visual acuity or occurrence of postoperative adverse events (except for posterior capsular opacification), can be attributed to performance of phacoemulsification versus ECCE or to the reported annual volume of cataract surgery of the surgeon. Self-reported high and very high annual volume of cataract surgery is associated independently with performance of phacoemulsification and surgeon's report of posterior capsular opacification at 4 months after cataract surgery.

The VF-14. An index of functional impairment in patients with cataract.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the development and the performance of a brief questionnaire designed to measure functional impairment caused by cataract (the VF-14). DESIGN: Observational cross-sectional study. Patients were recruited between July 15 and December 15, 1991. SETTING: Patients were recruited from the practices of 70 ophthalmologists, located in Columbus, Ohio (N = 21), St Louis, Mo (N = 26), and Houston, Tex (N = 23). PATIENTS: Seven hundred sixty-six patients undergoing cataract surgery for the first time. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Preoperative best corrected visual acuity in each eye; scores on the VF-14, a new index of functional impairment in patients with cataract; patient reports of overall trouble and satisfaction with their vision; and scores on the Sickness Impact Profile, a measure of general health status. RESULTS: The VF-14 has high internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = .85) and correlates more strongly with the overall self-rating of the amount of trouble and satisfaction patients have with their vision than do several measures of visual acuity or the Sickness Impact Profile score. The VF-14 score is moderately correlated with visual acuity in the better eye. CONCLUSIONS: The VF-14 is a reliable and valid measure of functional impairment caused by cataract and provides information not conveyed by visual acuity or a general measure of health status.

Personal changes, dispositional optimism, and psychological adjustment to bone marrow transplantation.

We investigated the number and direction of personal changes experienced by long-term survivors of bone marrow transplantation (BMT) and the relationships of those changes and dispositional optimism to psychological adjustment (current and future life satisfaction and mood). Surveys were returned by 86.0% (N = 135) of all eligible long-term survivors; respondents primarily were young males who were 6 to 149 months post-BMT. Subjects reported more positive changes in the relationship and existential/psychological domains and more negative changes in the physical health domain; there was no difference on the plans/activities domain. Negative changes were more strongly related to adjustment than were positive changes. The number of negative changes reported was significantly related to current and future life satisfaction and negative mood after controlling for demographic and illness variables and dispositional optimism. The interaction term for negative and positive changes was significantly related to future life satisfaction after controlling for all other variables.

The content and cost of cataract surgery.

Although more than 1 million cataract surgeries are performed annually in the United States, little is known about the frequency of use or cost of various services provided in connection with this procedure. To assess the frequency with which various ophthalmic, optometric, anesthesia, and medical services are provided in conjunction with cataract surgery and to estimate the cost to Medicare associated with those services, we analyzed 1985 through 1988 Medicare claims records of a nationally representative 5% sample of Medicare beneficiaries. The experience of 57,103 Medicare beneficiaries who underwent extracapsular cataract surgery in 1986 or 1987 that was not combined with another ophthalmologic procedure formed the basis of our analysis. Projections for current costs were performed using 1991 charges allowed by Medicare for physician services. We estimate that the median charge allowed by Medicare for a "typical" episode of cataract surgery in 1991 was approximately $2500. In addition to the $3.4 billion that Medicare spent in 1991 on such "typical" episodes, Medicare spent more than $39 million on miscellaneous "atypical" preoperative ophthalmologic tests, such as specular microscopy (14% of cases) and potential acuity testing (8% of cases), more than $7 million on postoperative ophthalmologic diagnostic tests, such as fluorescein angiography (3% of cases), and more than $18 million on perioperative medical services (most commonly electrocardiography and chest roentgenography). The major determinants of the cost to Medicare associated with cataract surgery are the rate of performance of cataract surgery and neodymium-YAG laser capsulotomy and the charges allowed for these procedures.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Vision change and quality of life in the elderly. Response to cataract surgery and treatment of other chronic ocular conditions.

OBJECTIVE: Evaluation of health care in older populations has increasingly focused on quality of life as a critical outcome of treatment. Vision is assumed to be central to functioning. Data suggest that aging, in itself, is associated with a decline in visual functioning, which, in turn, is related to a decline in physical and mental functioning. Other studies indicate that cataract surgery is followed by significant improvement in vision and visual function. Our objective was to test these assumptions. DESIGN: Prospective study of 1021 patients, consecutively drawn from 76 randomly selected ophthalmologists' offices in three cities. Structured interviews were completed at baseline, 2 months, and 1 year after entry. PATIENTS: Six hundred thirteen patients with cataracts and 408 other ophthalmic patients drawn from the same offices but treated for other chronic ocular disorders. All received refractive services as needed. SETTING: Patients from three cities (Baltimore, Md, St Louis, Mo, and San Diego, Calif) were interviewed once in their homes and twice by telephone. INTERVENTIONS: The study involved the measurement of the effects of usual treatment for cataracts and other degenerative eye diseases. MAJOR OUTCOME MEASURES: Visual, social, and psychological functioning. RESULTS: Within 1 year of treatment, change in visual function was accompanied by significant changes, in the same direction, in quality of life functions: night-time driving, daytime driving, community activities, home activities, mental health, and life satisfaction. In addition, the patients with cataracts showed significantly greater improvement in measures of vision than did the noncataract group. CONCLUSIONS: Regardless of treatment, improvement across quality of life functions occurred when visual function improved. Thus, many types of functional degeneration observed in older populations, attributed to a decline in vision, can be slowed, or even reversed, when visual function is improved. Cataract surgery was effective in improving vision and quality of life functions.

Outcomes of cataract surgery. Improvement in visual acuity and subjective visual function after surgery in the first, second, and both eyes.

OBJECTIVE: No previous study documents improvement in visual acuity and subjective visual function associated with cataract surgery in the first eye, second eye, and both eyes. Measurement of subjective aspects of visual function and quality of life provides information that cannot be obtained with simple measurement of Snellen visual acuity. METHODS: From 76 ophthalmology practices in three cities, patients undergoing cataract extraction with intraocular lens implantation (n = 613) and comparison patients (n = 408) were enrolled in a prospective study. Questionnaires elicited visual function information before and after surgery, and visual acuity was obtained from the ophthalmologic record. RESULTS: Among patients with cataract and no other eye disease, baseline subjective visual function before surgery in the second eye was better than that before surgery in the first eye. Improvement in subjective visual function was approximately equal postoperatively in first and second eyes. Improvement in subjective function in both eyes postoperatively was significantly greater than that after surgery in the first eye or second eye alone. No statistically significant difference across surgical groups in the proportion of patients demonstrating improvement in visual acuity was observed. CONCLUSION: Patients who underwent surgery in both eyes reported greater improvement in subjective visual function than did those who underwent surgery in one eye. Thus, there seems to be a benefit associated with restoring binocular vision in this population. These findings support the policy recommendation that cataract surgery in both eyes remains the appropriate treatment for patients with bilateral, cataract-induced visual impairment.

The influence of patient-related variables in the timing of cataract extraction.

Data from a prospective study of quality of life after cataract extraction with intraocular lens implantation were used to examine associations between patient factors and the timing of cataract extraction. The 495 patients were drawn from 76 ophthalmologists' offices in three cities. Patients were categorized as waiting three months or less or four months or more to schedule their operations after their physicians' recommendations. Patients who delayed scheduling their operations were more likely to be younger, have higher incomes, be working full-time, have higher life satisfaction, have lower levels of depression and higher levels of vigor, have had a less than perfect previous operation, have lower scores for mid-range vision and higher scores for cataract symptoms, be fearful of nighttime driving, and be heavy drinkers. Conversely, patients who delayed their operations were less likely to be covered by Medicare and to expect excellent postoperative vision and a short recovery time. A discriminant analysis correctly classified 68.9% of the patients according to timing group.

Quality of life and cataracts: a review of patient-centered studies of cataract surgery outcomes.

In the next 10 years growing numbers of adults will be reaching the age at which senile cataracts typically develop. At the same time, pressure is strong to contain medical expenses. In order to formulate wise public policy in this area it is important to describe the effects of this treatment on the patient's quality of life. After a general discussion of research on patient-centered medical outcomes, 18 studies of patient-centered cataract surgery outcomes are reviewed. Then the findings, both direct outcomes (visual acuity, percentage visual impairment, complications, visual functioning, physical and mental functioning, general well-being, and satisfaction with care) as well as modifying factors (type of prosthesis, presurgical functional status, condition of fellow eye, other ocular pathology, comorbidity, age, gender, socioeconomic status, attitudes, and values) are summarized. The closing discussion summarizes findings, describes two studies underway, and suggests directions for future studies of cataract surgery effects.