Surgical management of ovarian masses in children and adolescents: experience of an academic institution in France.

PURPOSE: Surgical management of ovarian masses in girls still challenging. The aim of the study is to report an 8-year experience in managing children with ovarian masses, and to demonstrate the advantages and the limitations of laparoscopy for such lesions. METHODS: Data of girls aged less than 18 years operated because of an ovarian mass between January 2015 and February 2023 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were divided into two groups: group A including children operated by laparoscopy, and Group B of patients who underwent open surgery. RESULTS: Eighty-eight children were enrolled. Laparoscopy was performed in 56 patients (63.6%). Group A patients had smaller tumor size (53.6±38.5 vs. 122.2±75.4 mm, P<0.0001), shorter operative time (50.4±20.3 vs. 71.5±36.5 min, P = 0.004), reduced length of hospital stay (1.4±1.1 vs. 3±2.3 days, P<0.0001), and absence of postoperative complications. Only 3 cases (5.7%) of recurrence were seen exclusively within patients followed for benign tumors during a mean follow-up period of 4.6±3 years. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopy should be done in benign ovarian lesions or/and if a torsion is seen. For tumors at high risk of malignancy, laparoscopy can be performed to establish a clear macroscopic diagnosis, for staging of the disease, and resection of small tumors. Conversion to open surgery is indicated in case of doubt.

Pectus Arcuatum: A Pectus Unlike Any Other.

BACKGROUND: Pectus arcuatum is often mistaken for a type of pectus carinatum. However, pectus arcuatum is a unique clinical form of pectus caused by premature obliteration of the sternal sutures (manubrial sternum, four sternebrae and xiphoïd process), whereas pectus carinatum is due to abnormal growth of the costal cartilage. In order to better describe pectus arcuatum, we analysed the files of patients with pectus arcuatum followed in our centers. METHODS: Multicenter retrospective study of young patients' files diagnosed with pectus arcuatum. RESULTS: The clinical diagnosis of pectus arcuatum was made in 34 patients with a mean age at diagnosis of 10.3 years (4-23 years). A chest profile X-ray or a CT scan was performed in 16 patients (47%) and confirmed the diagnosis of PA by the presence of a sternal fusion. It was complete in 12 patients. A malformation was associated in 35% of cases (Noonan syndrome 33%, scoliosis 25% or cardiopathy 16%). 11 patients (32%) had a family history of skeletal malformation. Orthopedic treatment was initiated in 3 patients without any success. 11 patients underwent surgical correction, which was completed in 7 of them. CONCLUSION: The diagnosis of pectus arcuatum is based on clinical experience and if necessary, on a profile chest X-ray showing the fusion of the sternal pieces. It implies the search for any associated malformations (musculoskeletal, cardiac, syndromic). Bracing treatment is useless for pectus arcuatum. Corrective surgery, based on a sternotomy associated with a partial chondro-costal resection, can be performed at the end of growth. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Outcome of long gap esophageal atresia at 6 years: A prospective case control cohort study.

BACKGROUND DATA: EA is the most frequent congenital esophageal malformation. Long gap EA remains a therapeutic challenge for pediatric surgeons. A case case-control prospective study from a multi-institutional national French data base was performed to assess the outcome, at age of 1 and 6 years, of long gap esophageal atresia (EA) compared with non-long gap EA/tracheo-esophageal fistula (TEF). The secondary aim was to assess whether initial treatment (delayed primary anastomosis of native esophagus vs. esophageal replacement) influenced mortality and morbidity at ages 1 and 6 years. METHODS: A multicentric population-based prospective study was performed and included all patients who underwent EA surgery in France from January 1, 2008 to December 31, 2010. A comparative study was performed with non-long gap EA/TEF patients. Morbidity at birth, 1 year, and 6 years was assessed. RESULTS: Thirty-one patients with long gap EA were compared with 62 non-long gap EA/TEF patients. At age 1 year, the long gap EA group had longer parenteral nutrition support and longer hospital stay and were significantly more likely to have complications both early post-operatively and before age 1 year compared with the non-long gap EA/TEF group. At 6 years, digestive complications were more frequent in long gap compared to non-long gap EA/TEF patients. Tracheomalacia was the only respiratory complication that differed between the groups. Spine deformation was less frequent in the long gap group. There were no differences between conservative and replacement groups at ages 1 and 6 years except feeding difficulties that were more common in the native esophagus group. CONCLUSIONS: Long gap strongly influenced digestive morbidity at age 6 years.

Laparoscopic Management of a Rudimentary Uterine Horn.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To demonstrate a technique of laparoscopic management of a rudimentary horn in a 12-year-old girl. DESIGN: A step-by-step explanation of the surgery using a video (instructive video) approved by the local institutional review board. SETTING: A university hospital (University Hospital of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France). PATIENT: A 12-year-old girl with a uterine rudimentary horn. INTERVENTION: We describe a case of a 12-year-old girl who had no medical history. She had her first menstruation at 11 years old with major left pelvic pain occurring each month. Ultrasonography showed a duplication of the uterus with a liquid collection on the left side; this type of malformation is called an accessory and cavitated uterine mass. Medical treatment was initiated with progestin. Magnetic resonance imaging showed a left noncommunicating rudimentary horn with a unicornuate uterus. No other malformation was present, particularly in the kidneys. A primary vaginal endoscopy was performed showing a single cervix without vaginal malformation. It was decided to perform a laparoscopic excision of the left rudimentary horn. We placed a 10-mm optical port into the umbilicus and 3 accessory 5-mm trocars. Evaluation of the abdominal cavity showed 2 normal adnexas with normal ovaries. We decided to start with a left salpingectomy using the Ligasure device (Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN), staying close to the tube to preserve ovarian vascularization. The remnant fimbria must be removed to avoid cancerization. Then, the vesicouterine septum was divided until we reached the cervix to dissect the bladder from the rudimentary horn. The broad ligament was fenestrated in order to push the left ureter laterally .The utero-ovarian pedicle was transected with the Ligasure device; the left ovary was preserved and vascularized by the left infundibulopelvic ligament. We then dissected the left uterine artery. The posterior peritoneum was opened. The resection of the rudimentary horn was performed by means of a monopolar hook. The dissection was performed slowly with selective coagulation until we reached the cavity of the horn, with old blood flowing out. The entire cavity was removed, and we confirmed the absence of communication with the other part of the uterus. Uterine reconstruction was performed with inverted separated stiches of a 2-0 braided suture, and, finally, an antiadhesion barrier was placed. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic management of a uterine rudimentary horn is feasible with satisfactory uterine reconstruction. This is not the first case of this surgery performed by laparoscopy. A similar case has been published in 2015 [1], and recently another video [2] has been published describing 2 other cases.