Evaluation of plasma cystatin C as a marker for glomerular filtration rate in patients with type 2 diabetes.

AIM: To evaluate plasma cystatin C as a marker of the glomerular filtration rate in patients with type 2 diabetes and their age and sex-matched controls. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-seven patients with one decade of type 2 diabetes and 51 non-diabetic control subjects were studied. Plasma cystatin C was measured by particle-enhanced turbidimetric immunoassay in a new application for the Hitachi 704 analyzer. For comparison, plasma creatinine and creatinine clearance were measured. The plasma clearance of 51Cr-EDTA by the single injection method was utilized as reference. RESULTS: In patients with type 2 diabetes the correlation coefficient between plasma cystatin C and the plasma clearance of 51Cr-EDTA was 0.774 (Spearman's coefficient) and that between plasma creatinine and the plasma clearance of 51Cr-EDTA was 0.556 (p = 0.001 for the difference). The correlation between creatinine clearance and the plasma clearance of 51Cr-EDTA was 0.411. In receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis the diagnostic accuracy of plasma cystatin C was significantly better than that of plasma creatinine (p = 0.047) or creatinine clearance (p = 0.001). The best diagnostic efficiency (98%) for cystatin C was obtained when the cut-off limit was set at 1.32 mg/l. In the control group the correlation coefficients were: between cystatin C and the plasma clearance of 51Cr-EDTA 0.627, between creatinine and the plasma clearance of 51Cr-EDTA 0.466 and between creatinine clearance and the plasma clearance of 51Cr-EDTA 0.416. The area under the ROC plot curve of cystatin C was also greatest in the control group, but the diagnostic accuracy of cystatin C was marginally better than that of either plasma creatinine (p = 0.05) or creatinine clearance (p = 0.08). Among the control subjects various non-renal causes may have interfered with cystatin C concentrations reducing the correlations. CONCLUSIONS: Cystatin C measurement is a more sensitive and specific test for GFR in patients with type 2 diabetes than plasma creatinine or its clearance, when GFR is normal or only slightly reduced. If an elevated cystatin C concentration is found, non-renal factors have to be excluded. The turbidimetric application described here can easily be applied for most clinical chemistry analyzers and is therefore useful in daily clinical practice.

Coronary flow reserve is reduced in young men with IDDM.

Disturbances of coronary circulation have been reported in diabetic patients with microvascular complications but without obstructive coronary atherosclerosis. The aim of the present study was to investigate coronary flow reserve in young adult patients with IDDM but without microalbuminuria and diabetic autonomic neuropathy. Coronary flow reserve was determined in 12 nonsmoking male patients with IDDM (age 30.0 +/- 6.6 years) and 12 healthy matched volunteers. Groups were similar with respect to blood pressure and serum lipid concentrations, and no subject had a positive family history of coronary heart disease. The patients with IDDM had normal exercise echocardiography and autonomic nervous function tests. Five patients had minimal background retinopathy, and none had microalbuminuria. Positron emission tomography and [15O]H2O were used to measure myocardial blood flow at rest and after dipyridamole administration. The studies were performed during euglycemic hyperinsulinemia (serum insulin approximately 70 mU/l). The baseline myocardial blood flow was similar in patients with IDDM and in control subjects (0.84 +/- 0.18 vs. 0.88 +/- 0.25 ml x g(-1) x min(-1), NS). The myocardial blood flow during hyperemia was 29% lower in patients with IDDM (3.17 +/- 1.57) compared with the control subjects (4.45 +/- 1.37 ml x g(-1) x min(-1), P < 0.05). Consequently, coronary flow reserve (the ratio of flow during hyperemia and at rest) was lower in diabetic patients than in control subjects (3.76 +/- 1.69 vs. 5.31 +/- 1.86, P < 0.05) and the total coronary resistance during hyperemia was higher in diabetic patients (53.7 +/- 31.5) compared with the control subjects (31.4 +/- 11.6 mmHg x min x g x ml(-1), P < 0.05). The coronary flow reserve was similar in diabetic patients with and without mild background retinopathy. No association was found between the coronary flow reserve and serum lipid or HbA1c values in either group. Coronary flow reserve is impaired in young adult males with IDDM and no or minimal microvascular complications and without any evidence of coronary heart disease. This abnormality cannot be explained by standard coronary heart disease risk factors. The results imply early impairment of coronary vascular reactivity in IDDM patients, which may represent an early precursor of future coronary heart disease or may contribute to the pathogenesis of diabetic cardiomyopathy.