Histological alterations in implant and one-year protocol biopsy specimens of renal allografts.

BACKGROUND: The natural course of histological changes and their correlations with clinical parameters have not been studied in large numbers in renal allograft specimens. The aim of this study was to determine whether any histological alterations developed during the first posttransplantation year. Immunological and nonimmunological factors possibly associated with subsequent histopathological changes and development of chronic rejection were also assessed. METHODS: We studied 102 cadaveric kidney allografts for which both implant and 1-year protocol biopsy specimens were available. The chronic allograft damage index (CADI) was used to quantify the extent of histological changes that developed during the first year. RESULTS: Overall, an increase in histological alterations were seen during the first posttransplantation year, and the CADI increased significantly. The mean CADI was 0.7 in relation to implant biopsy samples and 2.9 in relation to 1-year biopsy samples (P<0.05). Although the degree of changes increased during the first posttransplantation year, they were seldom severe. Significant increases in incidences of interstitial inflammation and fibrosis, tubular atrophy, and basement-membrane thickening were seen. Vascular intimal proliferation and glomerular mesangial matrix increase and glomerular sclerosis were also noted. In contrast, anisometric vacuolization in the tubular epithelium decreased significantly in incidence during the first year. CADI values 1 year after transplantation were significantly affected by donor age, occurrence of acute rejection episodes, and prevalence of HLA-DR mismatches. CADIs were also significantly higher in grafts with decreased function. CONCLUSIONS: Histopathological alterations increased in almost every graft, even well-functioning grafts, during the first year. The CADIs relating to alterations seen in cases of chronic rejection increased significantly and were strongly affected by both immunological and nonimmunological factors.

Histopathological findings in renal allografts at time of transplantation and correlation with onset of graft function.

Histopathological changes quantified using the chronic allograft damage index (CADI) have been shown to predict subsequent graft outcome and developing chronic rejection. The aim of the study reported here was to investigate the extent to which cadaveric renal allografts exhibit histopathological changes at time of transplantation, focusing on changes covered by the CADI. We also analysed whether any histopathological change predicts delayed graft function. One hundred and twenty-eight cadaveric kidney allografts with adequate protocol biopsy were studied. Tubular epithelial anisometric vacuolization was the commonest change, found in 62% of grafts and scored moderate or severe in 28% of these cases. Other prevalent changes were interstitial fibrosis, vascular hyalinosis, glomerular sclerosis and tubular basement-membrane thickening in 40%, 37%, 28% and 22% of biopsies, respectively. Intensities were, however, scored as mild in over 95% of specimens. The mean CADI for all grafts was 0.74. A significant difference in CADIs was seen between grafts from donors under and over 40 years of age. Grafts with early, delayed and no function had a similar incidence of histopathological changes. Histopathological changes in renal allografts were mostly uncommon and mild at time of transplantation, but some grafts exhibited changes which were quantified using the CADI. Though histopathological changes quantified with the CADI are predictive of subsequent graft function, they did not affect onset of graft function.

Long-term graft outcome is not necessarily affected by delayed onset of graft function and early acute rejection.

BACKGROUND: Both acute rejection episodes and delayed graft function (DGF) have been shown to be associated with decreased 1-year renal allograft survival. In our center, the incidence and the intensity of acute rejection episodes have been reduced by cyclosporine-based triple-drug therapy. We have also shown that DGF alone is not a risk factor for long-term graft survival. METHODS: We have now investigated whether an acute rejection episode together with DGF significantly effects long-term graft outcome. This study involved 862 first cadaveric renal allografts and 182 regrafts. RESULTS: The incidence of DGF was 33% after first transplants and 44% after retransplants. The overall incidence of acute rejection episodes was 23% in first grafts and 28% in regrafts. After first grafts, there were no statistically significant differences in graft survival rates and half-lives between the early graft function (EGF) and DGF groups with or without acute rejection. In regrafts, graft survival was significantly higher in the EGF group without acute rejection than in the DGF group with acute rejection. However, if all other causes except chronic rejection were censored, the half-life in the EGF group without acute rejection was 17.3 years in first grafts, and in the DGF group with acute rejection, that number was 11.5 years in first grafts; for regrafts, the half-life was 12.3 years and 6.1 years, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Acute rejection together with DGF could contribute to initial damage to the graft, and this might lead to later chronic allograft failure. In our study, this effect was evident only in the case of retransplants.