High Expression Levels of Long Noncoding RNA Small Nucleolar RNA Host Gene 18 and Semaphorin 5A Indicate Poor Prognosis in Multiple Myeloma.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to detect the expression of long noncoding RNA small nucleolar RNA host gene 18 (SNHG18) andsemaphorin 5A (SEMA5A) genes in multiple myeloma (MM) patients and to explore the correlation of the expression of these genes with the clinical characteristics and prognosis of MM patients. METHODS: Forty-seven newly diagnosed MM, 18 complete remission MM, 13 refractory/relapse MM, and 22 iron deficiency anemia (serving as control) samples were extracted at the Department of Hematology, Second Affiliated Hospital of Xian Jiaotong University between January 2015 and December 2016. The clinical features of the MM patients are summarized. Real-time quantitative PCR was performed to analyze the relative expression levels of the SNHG18 and SEMA5Agenes. The clinical characteristics and overall survival (OS) of the MM patients were statistically analyzed while measuring different levels of SNHG18 and SEMA5Agene expression. At the same time, the correlation between the expression of SNHG18 and SEMA5A was also analyzed. RESULTS: The analysis confirmed that SNHG18 and its possible target gene SEMA5A were both highly expressed in newly diagnosed MM patients. After analyzing the clinical significance of SNHG18 and SEMA5A in MM patients, we found that the expression of SNHG18 and SEMA5A was related to the Durie-Salmon (DS), International Staging System (ISS), and Revised International Staging System (R-ISS) classification systems, and the Mayo Clinic Risk Stratification for Multiple Myeloma (mSMART; p < 0.05). Moreover, we observed a significant difference in OS between the SNHG18/SEMA5A high expression group and the low expression group. We found a positive correlation between SNHG18 and SEMA5A expression (r = 0.709, p < 0.01). Surprisingly, the expected median OS times of both the SNHG18 and SEMA5Ahigh expression groups were significantly decreased, which was in contrast to those of both the SNHG18 and SEMA5Alow expression groups and the single-gene high expression group (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: High expression of both SNHG18 and SEMA5A is associated with poor prognosis in patients with MM.

Focusing on long non-coding RNA dysregulation in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma.

AIMS: Multiple myeloma (MM) is an incurable hematological cancer with a higher rate of relapse. Alterations in the function of long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) promote the progression and metastasis of cancer. We carry out this study to explore the expression profile of differently expressed lncRNAs in newly diagnosed MM. MAIN METHODS: The Bone marrows we analyzed were obtained from five MM and five IDA patients (serving as controls). Arraystar Human LncRNA Array V4.0 was used to profile expression of lncRNAs and mRNAs. Gene ontology (GO) and pathway analysis were utilized to understand the biological roles of differently expressed genes, while Database for Annotation, Visualization and Integrated Discovery (DAVID) was used for constructing the lncRNA-mRNA co-expression network. Quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) was performed to confirm the expressions of dysregulated lncRNAs. KEY FINDINGS: Bioinformatic analysis of the lncRNA expression identified >3000 dysregulated lncRNAs (difference ≥ 2-fold) in MM samples. GO and pathway analysis revealed that ECM-receptor and cell cycle pathway-related genes were significantly associated with MM. Four dysregulated lncRNAs were confirmed by qRT-PCR. Among them, the expression of ST3GAL6-AS1, LAMA5-AS1and RP11-175D17.3wereassociated with stage and risk status of MM. On the basis of GEO public database analysis, LAMA5-AS1 was related with an overall survival rate of MM patients. SIGNIFICANCE: These results reveal the feasible functions of lncRNAs in pathogenesis of MM. Further studies are required to explore whether these lncRNAs could serve as candidate therapeutic targets and new molecular biomarkers for MM.

Expression profile analysis of long non-coding RNA in acute myeloid leukemia by microarray and bioinformatics.

Long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) are transcripts longer than 200 nt that are involved in tumorigenesis and play a key role in cancer progression. To determine whether lncRNAs are involved in acute myeloid leukemia (AML), we analyzed the expression profile of lncRNAs and mRNAs in AML. Five pairs of AML patients and iron deficiency anemia (IDA) controls were screened by microarray. Through coexpression analysis, differently expressed transcripts were divided into modules, and lncRNAs were functionally annotated. We further analyzed the clinical significance of crucial lncRNAs from modules in public data. Finally, the expression of three lncRNAs, RP11-222K16.2, AC092580.4, and RP11-305O.6, were validated in newly diagnosed AML, AML relapse, and IDA patient groups by quantitative RT-PCR, which may be associated with AML patients' overall survival. Further analysis showed that RP11-222K16.2 might affect the differentiation of natural killer cells, and promote the immunized evasion of AML by regulating Eomesodermin expression. Analysis of this study revealed that dysregulated lncRNAs and mRNAs in AML vs IDA controls could affect the immune system and hematopoietic cell differentiation. The biological functions of those lncRNAs need to be further validated.

Busulfan plus fludarabine compared with busulfan plus cyclophosphamide as a conditioning regimen prior to hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in patients with hematologic neoplasms: a meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of the article is to critically appraise and synthesize available evidence regarding the efficacy and regimen-related toxicity (RRT) of Busulfan plus fludarabine (BuFlu) compared to busulfan plus cyclophosphamide (BuCy) as a conditioning regimen, prior to allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) in patients with hematologic neoplasms. METHODS: A meta-analysis was attempted on clinical controlled trials (CCTs), randomized or non-randomized controlled trials (RCTs or non-RCTs), comparing BuCy with BuFlu. We did a systematic search of the indexed medical literature using appropriate keywords to identify potentially relevant articles. The primary outcome of interest was efficacy measured by overall survival (OS) and event-free survival (EFS), acute graft-versus-host-disease (aGVHD). Chronic GVHD (extensive) and other toxicity were secondary endpoints. A relative risk or risk ratio (RR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) was calculated for each outcome in the meta-analysis. RESULTS: Nine clinical controlled trials were included, of which 4 tries were RCTs involving 584 patients and the other 5 were non-RCTs involving 571 patients. The cumulative incidences of OS, EFS, acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) were not significantly different between the two regimens. The non-relapse mortality was higher in BuCy but non-significant increment (RR=1.48, 95% CI: [0.97-2.26]). Liver related toxicity was significantly higher with BuCy compared to BuFlu (RR=1.90, 95% CI: [1.00-3.61]). CONCLUSION: Liver related toxicity is significantly lesser with BuFlu, but BuFlu regimen has no significant benefits compared with BuCy in OS, EFS, aGVHD. For all this, the weight of evidence favors BuFlu over BuCy as a first choice-conditioning regimen for patients with hematologic neoplasms, especially for people who have poor liver function.