Randomized comparison of dexamethasone-eluting stents with bare metal stent implantation in patients with acute coronary syndrome: serial angiographic and sonographic analysis.

AIMS: The aim of this study is to compare the anti-inflammatory effect of the dexamethasone preloaded stent (Dexamet, Abbott, Galway, Ireland) with the bare metal stent (BMS; BiodivYsio, Biocompatibles Cardiovascular LTD, Galway, Ireland) in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) assessed by angiographic (QCA) and intracoronary ultrasound (ICUS). METHODS AND RESULTS: One hundred twenty patients with ACS were randomly assigned to revascularization using the Dexamet stent (n = 60) or BMS (n = 60). Serial QCA analysis and ICUS analysis were performed during long-term follow-up (2.9 F; 20 MHz transducer; Volcano Corp, Brussels, Belgium). Power calculations were performed for QCA-derived differences of lumen loss. In addition, statistical analysis was performed (SPSS for Windows 12.0.1). The target lesion revascularization rate was lower in the Dexamet group (10 [16.67%] vs 20 [33.33%] patients; P = .031). The QCA revealed improved lumen restoration in the Dexamet stent group (lumen loss, 0.55 +/- 0.65 vs 1.07 +/- 0.92 mm [P = .001]; loss index, 0.20 +/- 0.23 vs 0.46 +/- 0.42 [P < .001]). The ICUS revealed greater neointimal proliferation in the BMS versus the Dexamet stent group (3.36 +/- 1.03 vs 3.05 +/- 1.38 mm2; P < .001). Death (n = 1) and the number of total occlusions of the stent segment (n = 1) were identical in both groups. CONCLUSION: Dexamet stents, in comparison with the BMS stents, reduced the target lesion revascularization rate in patients with ACS and lead to better lumen restoration during long-term follow-up.

Recurrent severe gastrointestinal bleeding and malabsorption due to extensive habitual megacolon.

Dilatation of the colon and the rectum, which is not attributable to aganglionosis, is a rare finding and can be the result of intractable chronic constipation. We report a rare case of a 29-year-old male patient with impressive megacolon, in whom Hirschsprung's or Chagas disease was ruled out. In the present case, dilatation of the colon was most likely due to a behavioral disorder with habitual failure of defecation. Chronic stool retention led to a bizarre bulging of the large bowel with displacement of the other abdominal organs and severe occult blood loss. Because of two episodes of life-threatening gastrointestinal bleeding despite conventional treatment of constipation, a surgical approach for bowel restoration was necessary. Temporary loop ileostomy had to be performed for de-pressurization of the large bowel and the subsequent possibility for effective antegrade colonic lavage to remove impacted stools. Shortly after the operation, the patient was healthy and could easily manage the handling of the ileostomy. However, the course of the megacolon in this young adult cannot be predicted and the follow-up will have to reveal if regression of this extreme colonic distension with reestablishment of regular rectal perception will occur.