Waist circumference to assess reversal of insulin resistance following weight reduction after bariatric surgery: cohort and cross-sectional studies.

OBJECTIVE: To validate the use of waist circumference to assess reversal of insulin resistance after weight loss induced by bariatric surgery. DESIGN: In cross-sectional studies, threshold values for insulin resistance were determined with homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) (algorithm based on fasting plasma glucose and insulin) in 1018 lean subjects and by hyperinsulinemic euglycemic clamp (clamp) in 26 lean women. In a cohort study on 211 patients scheduled for bariatric surgery, HOMA-IR and waist circumference were measured before and 1.5-3 years after weight reduction. In a subgroup of 53 women, insulin sensitivity was also measured using clamp. RESULTS: The threshold for insulin resistance (90th percentile) was 2.21 (mg dl(-1) fasting glucose × mU l(-1) fasting insulin divided by 405) for HOMA-IR and 6.118 (mg glucose per kg body weight per minute) for clamp. Two methods to assess reversal of insulin resistance by measuring waist circumference were used. A single cutoff value to <100 cm for waist circumference was associated with reversal of insulin resistance with an odds ratio (OR) of 49; 95% confidence interval (CI)=7-373 and P=0.0002. Also, a diagram based on initial and weight loss-induced changes in waist circumference in patients turning insulin sensitive predicted reversal of insulin resistance following bariatric surgery with a very high OR (32; 95% CI=4-245; P=0.0008). Results with the clamp cohort were similar as with HOMA-IR analyses. CONCLUSIONS: Reversal of insulin resistance could either be assessed by a diagram based on initial waist circumference and reduction of waist circumference, or by using 100 cm as a single cutoff for waist circumference after weight reduction induced by bariatric surgery.

Lipolysis index: evaluation of a new tool for metabolic assessment in epidemiological studies on obesity.

Lipid mobilization through adipocyte lipolysis is central for energy metabolism and is decreased in obesity. However, the factors of importance for lipolytic activity in the general population are not known. To further examine this we performed a cross-sectional study on teenagers and adults. We constructed and evaluated a simple index of lipolytic activity (ratio of fasting p-glycerol and body fat %) in population based samples in 316 teenagers (BMI 16-51 kg/m (2)) and 3,039 adults (BMI 16-70 kg/m (2)). In the adults, multiple regression analysis showed that waist and BMI but not age, plasma insulin, plasma noradrenaline or waist-to-hip ratio contributed independently and inversely to lipolytic activity (partial r=-0.37 and -0.28, respectively, p<0.0001). Together waist and BMI explained about 45% of the variability of lipolysis. Waist was a stronger factor than BMI in stepwise regression. The same analysis in teenagers showed that only BMI contributed independently and inversely to lipolytic activity (partial r=-0.90, p<0.0001) and explained about 55% of lipolysis variation. BMI had the strongest effect on lipolysis in lean teenagers. The results were the same for men and women. At all levels of lipolytic activity plasma fatty acid levels were elevated in obese subjects (p<0.0001). We conclude that during adolescence BMI is the major factor negatively influencing lipolytic activity, in particular among lean young subjects. In adulthood central fat accumulation together with increasing BMI decreases lipolysis. In spite of low lipolytic activity circulating fatty acid levels are increased in obesity, probably due to an adipose mass effect.