More than a third of middle-aged adults (50-65) have understated executive dysfunction.

OBJECTIVES: Understated executive dysfunction (UED) is predictive of cognitive decline and death. We aimed to assess the prevalence of UED, assessed with the clock-drawing test (CDT) and the Frontal Assessment Battery (FAB) in middle-aged adults and to investigate associated characteristics. METHODS: Cross-sectional analysis of data on 516 community-dwellers aged 50-65, lacking cognitive complaints, who were included prospectively (2010-2017) after a multidimensional geriatric assessment at a "healthy ageing" outpatient clinic. Age- and educational-level-adjusted logistic models were used to assess factors associated with UED. RESULTS: The CDT and FAB were impaired in 27.7% and 14.7% of the participants (median age: 59.7 years). The prevalence [95% confidence interval (CI)] of UED was 36.2% [32.2-40.5%]. After adjustment for age and education, participants with UED were more likely to be obese (odds ratio [95%CI] = 1.89 [1.12-3.19], P = 0.02), and to have a metabolic syndrome (1.98 [1.06-3.72], P = 0.03). CONCLUSION: More than one third of middle-aged adults without cognitive complaints have UED, which was linked to obesity and metabolic syndrome. Cognitive screening tests targeting executive functions might be useful for early detection of UED and the initiation of multidomain interventions improving cognitive performance.

Several frailty parameters highly prevalent in middle age (50-65) are independent predictors of adverse events.

Although frailty can arise in middle age, very few studies have investigated frailty before 65 years. Our objectives were to assess the prevalence of frailty parameters in middle-aged individuals and probe the association with future adverse events. We performed cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses of community-dwelling individuals aged 50 to 65 (n = 411, median age: 59.0) having undergone a multidomain geriatric assessment (2010-2015) in an outpatient clinic in the greater Paris area of France (SUCCEED cohort). The primary outcome was a composite measure of adverse events (non-accidental falls, fractures, unplanned hospitalizations, death), recorded in 2016/2017. Multivariable logistic regression models were built to identify independent predictors. Six frailty parameters were highly prevalent (> 20%): low activity (40.1%), exhaustion (31.3%), living alone (28.5%), balance impairment (26.8%), weakness (26.7%), and executive dysfunction (23.2%). Female sex (odds ratio: 2.67 [95% confidence interval: 1.17-6.11]), living alone (2.39 [1.32-4.33]), balance impairment (2.09 [1.16-3.78]), executive dysfunction (2.61, [1.18-5.77]), and exhaustion (2.98 [1.65-5.39]) were independent predictors of adverse events. Many frailty parameters are already altered in middle-aged individuals and are predictive of adverse health events. Our findings highlight a possible need for frailty screening and preventive programs targeting middle-aged individuals.

Understated Cognitive Impairment Assessed with the Clock-Drawing Test in Community-Dwelling Individuals Aged ≥50 Years.

OBJECTIVES: To estimate the prevalence of understated cognitive impairment by administering the Clock-Drawing Test (CDT) to community-dwelling individuals aged ≥50 years and to investigate the associated clinical phenotype. DESIGN: A cross-sectional analysis of baseline data on community-dwelling individuals assessed at an outpatient clinic in the Paris region of France. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Participants aged ≥50 years (n = 488, median age: 62.1 years) prospectively included in the SUCCessful agEing outpatiEnt's Department survey between 2010 and 2014. METHODS: A multidimensional geriatric assessment, including cognition [7-point CDT, Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), the 5-word screening test (5-WT), and the Frontal Assessment Battery (FAB)], gait speed in dual tasks, mood [the Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS)], balance, physical functions (gait speed and handgrip strength), nutrition, bone density, and comorbidities; major cardiovascular risk factors, and Scheltens and Fazekas scores on brain magnetic resonance imaging. Baseline characteristics were analyzed as a function of the CDT score (<7 vs 7), using age-adjusted logistic models. RESULTS: The prevalence of impairment in the CDT was 23.6%; higher than the values for the MMSE (12.7%), 5-WT (2.3%), and FAB (16.6%). In age-adjusted analyses, a lower educational level (odds ratio [95% confidence interval] = 0.72 [0.58‒0.89]), diabetes (2.57 [1.14‒5.79]), metabolic syndrome (1.93 [1.05‒3.56]), lower gait speed in the cognitive dual task (1.27 [1.05‒1.53]), a poorer Geriatric Depression Scale score (1.86 [1.04‒3.32]), a poorer MMSE score (2.56 [1.35‒4.88]), a poorer FAB score (1.79 [1.01‒3.16]), impaired episodic memory in the 5-WT (4.11 [1.12‒15.02]), and a higher Scheltens score (P = .001) were significantly associated with CDT impairment. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Understated cognitive impairment is common among young seniors and is associated with factors known to be linked to a higher risk of cognitive decline and dementia. These findings suggest that the CDT may be of value for identifying high-risk individuals who may then benefit from targeted multidomain prevention actions (diet, exercise, cognitive training, and vascular risk factor management).

Identification of five frailty profiles in community-dwelling individuals aged 50-75: A latent class analysis of the SUCCEED survey data.

OBJECTIVES: We sought to identify frailty profiles in individuals aged 50-75 by considering frailty as an unobservable latent variable in a latent class analysis (LCA). STUDY DESIGN: 589 prospectively enrolled community-dwelling individuals aged 50-75 (median: 61.7 years) had undergone a standardized, multidomain assessment in 2010-2015. Adverse health outcomes (non-accidental falls, fractures, unplanned hospitalizations, and death) that had occurred since the assessment were recorded in 2016-2017. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The LCA used nine indicators (unintentional weight loss, relative slowness, weakness, impaired balance, osteoporosis, impaired cognitive functions, executive dysfunction, depression, and hearing impairment) and three covariates (age, gender, and consultation for health complaints). The resulting profiles were characterized by the Fried phenotype and adverse health outcomes. RESULTS: We identified five profiles: "fit" (LC1, 29.7% of the participants; median age: 59 years); "weight loss, relative slowness, and osteoporosis" (LC2, 33.2%; 63 years); "weakness and osteopenia" (LC3, 21.9%; 60 years); "impaired physical and executive functions" (LC4, 11%; 67 years); and "impaired balance, cognitive functions, and depression" (LC5, 4.3%; 70 years). Almost all members of LC3 and LC4 were female, and were more likely than members of other profiles to have a frail or pre-frail Fried phenotype. Non-accidental falls were significantly more frequent in LC4. LC5 (almost all males) had the highest number of comorbidities and cardiovascular risk factors but none was frail. CONCLUSIONS: Our data-driven approach covered most geriatric assessment domains and identified five frailty profiles. With a view to tailoring interventions and prevention, frailty needs to be detected among young seniors.