Comparison of Sensitivity and Specificity of Structured and Narrative Reports of Transvaginal Ultrasonogaphy for Adenomyosis.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To compare the sensitivity and specificity of the transvaginal ultrasonography (TVUS) narrative report with those of the structured report for the diagnosis of adenomyosis. DESIGN: Retrospective study. SETTING: A tertiary teaching hospital. PATIENTS: One hundred ninety-two patients (45 with adenomyosis and 147 controls) who underwent hysterectomy between 2012 and 2016 and were aged 30 years to 55 years, with available preoperative TVUS images, were included. INTERVENTIONS: To compare preoperative TVUS with histologic analysis of the uterus after hysterectomy for the diagnostic of adenomyosis. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Data regarding the presence of the ultrasonographic characteristics previously described for the diagnosis of adenomyosis were obtained from the original TVUS report (narrative report) and the structured report from 2 blinded radiologists (R1 and R2). Histologic analysis is defined as the gold standard for the diagnosis of adenomyosis. The mean age (45.4 ± 5.3 years vs 44.9 ± 4.8 years; p = .496) and clinical symptoms were similar between the adenomyosis and control groups, except for dyspareunia, which was more frequently reported in the patients with adenomyosis (25.6% vs 9.4%; p = .006). Most of TVUS characteristics were more frequently observed in the structured reports than in the narrative reports. The structured report presented higher sensitivity (R1: 84.4%, R2: 69.1%; narrative report: 31.1%; p <.05) and lower specificity (R1: 28.0%, R2: 31.2%; narrative report: 90.5%; p <.05) for adenomyosis. The structured report presented higher sensitivity and lower specificity for most of sonographic characteristics evaluated. After logistic regression analysis, no sonographic characteristics presented with statistical significance for the diagnosis of adenomyosis on R1's structured report, while globular uterus (odds ratio [OR] 0.276; p = .006; 95% CI, 0.11-0.697) and poorly defined junctional zone (OR 3.6; p = .007; 95% CI, 1.4-9.2) were significantly associated with adenomyosis. In the narrative report, a myometrial cyst was associated with a higher risk of adenomyosis (odds ratio 9.486, p =.002; CI, 2.359-38.149). CONCLUSION: The narrative reports were more specific, whereas the structured reports were more sensitive for the diagnosis of adenomyosis. In addition, the sensitivity of most of sonographic feature of adenomyosis was higher and the specificity was lower in the structured report. Future prospective studies comparing both reports are needed to validate the current findings.

Separation of benign and malignant breast lesions using dynamic contrast enhanced MRI in a biopsy cohort.

PURPOSE: To assess the diagnostic utility of contrast kinetic analysis for breast lesions and background parenchyma of women undergoing MRI-guided biopsies, for whom standard clinical analysis had failed to separate benign and malignant lesions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study included 115 women who had indeterminate lesions based on routine diagnostic breast MRI exams and underwent an MRI (3 Tesla) -guided biopsy of one or more lesions suspicious for breast cancer. Breast dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE)-MRI was performed using a radial stack-of-stars three-dimensional spoiled gradient echo pulse sequence and modified k-space weighted image contrast image reconstruction. Contrast kinetic model analysis was conducted to characterize the contrast enhancement patterns measured in lesions and background parenchyma (BP). The transfer rate (Ktrans ), interstitial volume fraction (ve ), and vascular volume fraction (vp ) estimated from the lesion and BP were used to separate malignant from benign lesions. RESULTS: The patients with malignant lesions had significantly (P < 0.05) higher median lesion-Ktrans (0.081 min-1 ), higher median BP-Ktrans (0.032 min-1 ), and BP-vp (0.020) than those without malignant lesions (0.056 min-1 , 0.017 min-1 and 0.012, respectively). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of the BP-Ktrans (0.687) was highest among the single parameters and higher than that of the lesion-Ktrans (0.664). The combined logistic regression model of lesion-Ktrans , lesion-ve , BP-Ktrans , BP-ve , and BP-vp had the highest AUC of 0.730. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that the contrast kinetic analysis of DCE-MRI data can be used to differentiate the malignant lesions from the benign and high-risk lesions among the indeterminate breast lesions recommended for MRI-guided biopsy exams. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3 J. MAGN. RESON. IMAGING 2017;45:1385-1393.

Breast MRI at 7 Tesla with a bilateral coil and T1-weighted acquisition with robust fat suppression: image evaluation and comparison with 3 Tesla.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the image quality of T1-weighted fat-suppressed breast MRI at 7 T and to compare 7-T and 3-T images. METHODS: Seventeen subjects were imaged using a 7-T bilateral transmit-receive coil and 3D gradient echo sequence with adiabatic inversion-based fat suppression (FS). Images were graded on a five-point scale and quantitatively assessed through signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), fibroglandular/fat contrast and signal uniformity measurements. RESULTS: Image scores at 7 and 3 T were similar on standard-resolution images (1.1 × 1.1 × 1.1-1.6 mm(3)), indicating that high-quality breast imaging with clinical parameters can be performed at 7 T. The 7-T SNR advantage was underscored on 0.6-mm isotropic images, where image quality was significantly greater than at 3 T (4.2 versus 3.1, P ≤ 0.0001). Fibroglandular/fat contrast was more than two times higher at 7 T than at 3 T, owing to effective adiabatic inversion-based FS and the inherent 7-T signal advantage. Signal uniformity was comparable at 7 and 3 T (P < 0.05). Similar 7-T image quality was observed in all subjects, indicating robustness against anatomical variation. CONCLUSION: The 7-T bilateral transmit-receive coil and adiabatic inversion-based FS technique produce image quality that is as good as or better than at 3 T. KEY POINTS: • High image quality bilateral breast MRI is achievable with clinical parameters at 7 T. • 7-T high-resolution imaging improves delineation of subtle soft tissue structures. • Adiabatic-based fat suppression provides excellent fibroglandular/fat contrast at 7 T. • 7- and 3-T 3D T1-weighted gradient-echo images have similar signal uniformity. • The 7-T dual solenoid coil enables bilateral imaging without compromising uniformity.

O valor da fase sem contraste na tomografia computadorizada do abdome / The role of the unenhanced phase in the routine abdominal computed tomography

OBJETIVO: Determinar o valor agregado da fase sem meio de contraste da tomografia computadorizada do abdome em pacientes sem diagnóstico determinado ou em estadiamento tumoral. MATERIAIS E MÉTODOS: Estudo prospectivo e transversal em 100 pacientes consecutivos submetidos a tomografia computadorizada abdominal sem e com meio de contraste intravenoso. Dois examinadores avaliaram todos os exames, procurando estabelecer, através da fase com meio de contraste intravenoso (primeira análise) e posteriormente através da fase sem contraste (segunda análise), o diagnóstico principal e os secundários em função da indicação clínica do exame. Mediu-se a freqüência de mudança diagnóstica decorrente da análise combinada das fases pré- e pós-contraste intravenoso. Casos que tiveram mudança diagnóstica foram avaliados por especialistas clínicos para determinar se implicaria mudanças de conduta. RESULTADOS: Diagnósticos principal e secundário foram modificados em 1 e 18 casos, respectivamente (p = 1,000; p = 0,143). Os diagnósticos modificados foram: esteatose, definição de nódulo em adrenal, nefrolitíase, classificação de cistos renais e calcificação hepática. Nos casos em que a fase sem contraste modificou o diagnóstico, os especialistas mudaram sua conduta em 14/19 (73 por cento) dos pacientes (p = 0,038). CONCLUSÃO: A fase sem contraste não modificou significativamente o diagnóstico principal ou secundário. Porém, as mudanças nos diagnósticos secundários influenciaram na conduta adotada pelos especialistas.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the role of the unenhanced phase of abdominal computed tomography in patients without a definite diagnosis or undergoing tumor staging. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospective and transversal study was developed with 100 consecutive patients submitted to unenhanced and contrast-enhanced abdominal computed tomography. Two observers evaluated all the computed tomography images in the contrast-enhanced phase (first analysis) and, later, in the unenhanced phase (second analysis) in an attempt to establish the primary and secondary diagnoses as a function of the clinical indication for the study. The frequency of changes in the diagnoses resulting from a combined analysis of the images in the pre- and post-contrast phases was evaluated. Cases with changes in the diagnosis were reviewed by clinical specialists for determining possible changes in the therapeutic approach. RESULTS: Primary and secondary diagnoses were changed in respectively 1 and 18 cases (p = 1.000; p = 0.143) as follows: steatosis, adrenal nodules, nephrolithiasis, renal cysts and hepatic calcification. In the cases where the unenhanced phase changed the diagnosis, the specialists changed the therapeutic approach in 14 of the 19 patients (73 percent) (p = 0.038). CONCLUSION: No significant change was observed in the primary or secondary diagnosis as a result of the findings in the unenhanced phase. However, changes in secondary diagnoses affected the therapeutic approach adopted by the specialists.