Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Clin Hemorheol Microcirc ; 73(1): 105-111, 2019.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31561351

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Multiparametric-Magnetic Resonance Imaging (mpMRI)-Ultrasound fusion guided biopsy (Fbx) has emerged as the new standard of risk stratification for prostate cancer (PCa) with superior detection rates of clinically significant PCa than randomized biopsy. In the present study, we evaluated patients with suspicion of clinically significant PCa on mpMRI, but histopathologically proven Gleason 6 PCa in Fbx. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Between 2015 and 2019, 849 patients underwent Fbx and concurrent systematic 12-core biopsy at our department. 234 patients were diagnosed with Gleason 6 PCa in either mpMRI-targeted and/or concurrent systematic biopsy. Patients were analyzed regarding PSA, mpMRI findings according to PI-RADS classification, histopathological results of Fbx and systematic 12-core biopsy. 99/234 patients were also analyzed in regards of histopathology of the whole-mount specimen of subsequent radical prostatectomy (RP). RESULTS: In 131/234 patients (56%), Gleason 6 PCa was detected in the mpMRI target. In 103/234 patients (44%), Gleason 6 PCa was detected in the concurrent systematic 12-core biopsy with negative mpMRI-targeted biopsy. Men with evidence of Gleason 6 in the mpMRI target had significantly higher amounts of overall positive biopsies (median 4 vs. 2, p < 0.001) and higher maximum tumor infiltration per biopsy core (30% vs. 20%, p < 0.001) compared to men with negative mpMRI-targeted biopsy. Detection of Gleason 6 in mpMRI Target lesions correlated significantly with the PI-RADS score (p < 0.001). Patients with positive mpMRI-target had significantly higher tumor infiltration in whole-mount specimen after prostatectomy (20% vs. 15%, p = 0.0026) compared to men without detection of Gleason 6 in mpMRI-targeted biopsy but in additional systematic biopsy. CONCLUSION: Detection of Gleason 6 PCa in mpMRI-targeted biopsy indicates higher tumor burden compared to detection of Gleason 6 PCa in concurrent systematic biopsy and negative mpMRI-targeted biopsy.


Assuntos
Biópsia Guiada por Imagem/métodos , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética Multiparamétrica/métodos , Gradação de Tumores/métodos , Neoplasias da Próstata/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias da Próstata/diagnóstico , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neoplasias da Próstata/patologia
3.
Urologe A ; 56(2): 247-262, 2017 Feb.
Artigo em Alemão | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28154883

RESUMO

Urinary tract infections (UTI) are the most common bacterial infections in children. The symptoms are not very specific and range from abdominal pain, poor feeding to nocturnal urinary incontinence. The technique of collecting urine plays an important role for securing the diagnosis. The best way to obtain urine in non-toilet-trained children is catheterization or suprapubic bladder aspiration. In toilet-trained children midstream urine is an acceptable alternative after cleaning the foreskin or labia. In the case of an infection a prompt empirical antibiotic therapy is necessary to reduce the risk of parenchymal scarring of the kidneys. There are different approaches to diagnose vesicoureteral reflux in different countries. The commonly used standard approach in Germany is voiding cystourethrography. In the case of reflux dimercaptosuccinic acid (DMSA) scintigraphy should be performed additionally to exclude renal scarring (bottom-up approach).


Assuntos
Infecções Bacterianas/diagnóstico , Infecções Bacterianas/microbiologia , Infecções Urinárias/diagnóstico , Infecções Urinárias/microbiologia , Coleta de Urina/métodos , Refluxo Vesicoureteral/diagnóstico , Refluxo Vesicoureteral/microbiologia , Infecções Bacterianas/urina , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Medicina Baseada em Evidências , Feminino , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Masculino , Resultado do Tratamento , Infecções Urinárias/urina
4.
Urologe A ; 54(7): 956-62, 2015 Jul.
Artigo em Alemão | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26113301

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: For many years, sonography and the intravenous pyelogram (IVP) were the most important examination methods for the evaluation of the urinary tract in children. Both methods have their pros and cons: sonography provides ideal visualization of normal kidneys and the evaluation of the pelvicalyceal system. For detection or exclusion of renal scarring, however, this method is not well suited. It provides no information regarding kidney function. METHODS: With an IVP, it is possible to evaluate urinary excretion and, thus, indirectly assess kidney function. As this examination method involves radiation exposure and the necessity of a contrast agent, it should be avoided in the examination of children. The CT is an excellent examination method that can diagnose nearly all urological diseases in children or answer urological questions; however, a CT scan applies the highest radiation dose of all discussed methods. For this reason, examination via MRI is of increasing importance in uroradiology. Initially only the T2 sequences for the visualization of the urinary tract in children were applied. CONCLUSION: The current technical developments as well as the use of the contrast agent gadolinium and the antidiuretic agent furosemide allow an all-in-one evaluation of the kidneys and urinary tract.


Assuntos
Aumento da Imagem/métodos , Testes de Função Renal/métodos , Proteção Radiológica/métodos , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X/tendências , Ultrassonografia/métodos , Doenças Urológicas/diagnóstico , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Feminino , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Masculino , Doses de Radiação
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...