Barriers and Facilitators to the Implementation of an Eating Disorders Knowledge Exchange Program for Non-specialist Professionals.

Despite availability of evidence-based treatments for eating disorders (EDs), individuals with EDs often do not receive informed treatment. Training of non-specialized clinicians by experienced professionals through knowledge exchange (KE) programs is an effective way to enhance accessibility to evidence-based treatments for EDs. The authors conducted a qualitative analysis of factors that facilitated or impeded the uptake of an ED-focused KE program. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with mental health professionals (n = 43) and managers (n = 11) at 13 community mental-health sites at which the KE program was offered. Data were analyzed using a qualitative content analysis. Key facilitators identified were management support for the program and building competence through ongoing supervision of clinicians. Main barriers were limited access to ED patients to treat and having insufficient time to apply ED interventions in front-line settings. The results provide insights into the practical imperatives involved in implementing a KE initiative for ED treatment.

Barriers and facilitators to providing autonomy supportive counselling to individuals seeking treatment for an eating disorder.

PURPOSE: Self-determination theory suggests that autonomous motivation for change (i.e., motivation that is internal and self-endorsed) can be enhanced in therapeutic contexts by clinicians acting in an autonomy supportive manner. While previous research has established a link between autonomy support (AS) and autonomous motivation in enhancing outcomes in eating disorder (ED) treatment, few studies have examined factors that support or hinder therapists' ability to be autonomy supportive in the context of an ED therapeutic encounter. The goal of the present study was to conduct a qualitative analysis of personal and contextual factors that facilitated or hindered therapists' ability to provide autonomy supportive interventions. METHODS: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 10 therapists conducting outpatient psychotherapy at a specialized eating disorders treatment program. Data were analyzed using thematic analysis. RESULTS: The most frequently noted facilitators were organizational support of AS interventions and patients' engagement and motivation for treatment. The most frequently noted barriers were patients' personality variables such as patients that exhibit passive and help-rejecting behaviours, as well as therapists feeling overwhelmed due to a high workload. CONCLUSION: Our results provide insight into the factors that facilitate and impede the utilization of an autonomy supportive approach in specialized ED treatment and can be used to inform future quantitative research on such factors. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level V: Opinions of respected authorities, based on descriptive studies, narrative reviews, clinical experience, or reports of expert committees.