Current state of undergraduate medical school training in transfusion medicine and its impact on postgraduate trainee knowledge.

BACKGROUND: Studies have described poor transfusion medicine (TM) knowledge in postgraduate trainees. The impact of undergraduate medical TM education on postgraduate knowledge is unclear. METHODS: Canadian medical schools were surveyed on the number of hours dedicated to TM teaching and topics covered by curricula during 2016-2020. Postgraduate trainees attending Transfusion Camp in 2021 completed a pretest of 20 multiple-choice questions. The survey results and pretest scores were compared to evaluate the association between undergraduate medical TM education and pretest scores. RESULTS: The survey was completed by 16 of 17 Canadian medical schools. The number of hours (h) of TM teaching were <2 h (25%), 3-4 h (25%), and >4 h (50%). Twelve of 19 Transfusion Camp topics were covered in ≥50% of schools. Eleven medical schools provided ethics approvals/waivers to include trainee pretest scores in the analysis (N = 200). The median pretest scores by medical school ranged from 48% to 70%. No association was found between number of TM teaching hours and average pretest scores (p = .60). There was an association between higher postgraduate year level and individual pretest score (p < .0001). The analysis by topic demonstrated questions where trainees from different schools performed uniformly well or poorly; other topics showed considerable variation. CONCLUSION: Variation in quantity and content of undergraduate TM teaching exists across Canadian medical schools. In this limited assessment, the number of TM teaching hours was not associated with performance on the pretest. This study raises the opportunity to re-evaluate the delivery (content, timing, consistency) of TM education in undergraduate medical schools.

Implementing DPYD*2A Genotyping in Clinical Practice: The Quebec, Canada, Experience.

BACKGROUND: Fluoropyrimidines are used in chemotherapy combinations for multiple cancers. Deficient dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase activity can lead to severe life-threatening toxicities. DPYD*2A polymorphism is one of the most studied variants. The study objective was to document the impact of implementing this test in routine clinical practice. METHODS: We retrospectively performed chart reviews of all patients who tested positive for a heterozygous or homozygous DPYD*2A mutation in samples obtained from patients throughout the province of Quebec, Canada. RESULTS: During a period of 17 months, 2,617 patients were tested: 25 patients tested positive. All were White. Twenty-four of the 25 patients were heterozygous (0.92%), and one was homozygous (0.038%). Data were available for 20 patients: 15 were tested upfront, whereas five were identified after severe toxicities. Of the five patients confirmed after toxicities, all had grade 4 cytopenias, 80% grade ≥3 mucositis, 20% grade 3 rash, and 20% grade 3 diarrhea. Eight patients identified with DPYD*2A mutation prior to treatment received fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy at reduced initial doses. The average fluoropyrimidine dose intensity during chemotherapy was 50%. No grade ≥3 toxicities were observed. DPYD*2A test results were available in an average of 6 days, causing no significant delays in treatment initiation. CONCLUSION: Upfront genotyping before fluoropyrimidine-based treatment is feasible in clinical practice and can prevent severe toxicities and hospitalizations without delaying treatment initiation. The administration of chemotherapy at reduced doses appears to be safe in patients heterozygous for DPYD*2A. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Fluoropyrimidines are part of chemotherapy combinations for multiple cancers. Deficient dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase activity can lead to severe life-threatening toxicities. This retrospective analysis demonstrates that upfront genotyping of DPYD before fluoropyrimidine-based treatment is feasible in clinical practice and can prevent severe toxicities and hospitalizations without delaying treatment initiation. This approach was reported previously, but insufficient data concerning its application in real practice are available. This is likely the first reported experience of systematic DPYD genotyping all over Canada and North America as well.

A curious case of delayed hemolytic transfusion reaction with evanescent antibodies in a patient with hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia.

BACKGROUND: Delayed hemolytic reactions are potential complications of incompatible transfusions and are usually associated with the identification of a new antibody on serologic studies, following a second immunization event. However, in rare cases, the antibody investigation remains negative even if the clinical presentation would lead one to suspect otherwise. CASE REPORT: A 44-year-old woman with hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia presented to the emergency department with hematuria and low back pain after she had received three units of RBCs 2 weeks earlier. Hematology and biochemistry results were consistent with delayed hemolytic transfusion reaction, but surprisingly, serologic antibody investigations were negative. It was only when her plasma was tested with enzyme (ficin)-treated panel cells that anti-e was finally detected, with a 3+ reaction with all homozygous e+ cells. No reaction was seen with heterozygous e+ cells. Four months later, an anti-K was also detected on standard panels, while the anti-e remained detectable only with ficin-treated panel cells. Three years later, both antibodies had vanished and remained undetectable. The weakness of anti-e reaction, combined with the quick evanescence of both antibodies led to the suspicion of a potential underlying immunodeficiency disorder, which was confirmed by low immunoglobulin levels on two occasions. CONCLUSION: To our knowledge, this is the first case of immunodeficiency disorder diagnosed after the identification of evanescent antibody reactions. This case also outlines the importance of a good clinical history that should lead to further investigations when a hemolytic transfusion reaction is suspected.

The first case of severe acute hemolytic transfusion reaction caused by anti-Sc2.

BACKGROUND: Alloantibodies to the low-frequency antigen Scianna-2 (Sc2) have been implicated in cases of hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn but never in hemolytic transfusion reactions (HTRs); thus, the clinical significance of anti-Sc2 has yet to be fully addressed. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: A 26-year-old woman with thalassemia presented rigors, fever, nausea, abdominal pain, and hemolytic biochemistry after exposure to 75 mL of plasma-reduced red blood cells (RBCs). The RBC unit was issued by electronic crossmatch but was 3+ incompatible on recrossmatch by gel indirect antiglobulin test (IAT). The patient had anti-Sc2 previously identified, but considered to be clinically insignificant. The transfusion history was reviewed and a monocyte monolayer assay (MMA) was performed. RESULTS: The patient was investigated for a RBC reaction 9 years prior, when she developed symptoms of HTR. The RBC unit was crossmatched by immediate spin due to consistent screen negativity. Full crossmatch found the RBC 1+ incompatible by gel IAT with both pre/post samples, while direct antiglobulin test was negative (pre) and 1+ immunoglobulin G positive (post). The antibody remained unidentified and she was committed to gel IAT crossmatch. Two-years later, the specificity to Sc2 was deduced when one RBC unit was found 3+ incompatible. Finally, the transfusion reaction reported herein occurred when she received by happenstance RBCs from the same donor who was associated with the remote reaction 9 years earlier. MMA yielded highly positive phagocytic indices only for Sc2+ RBCs, including the donor's RBCs that triggered the severe HTR. CONCLUSION: This is the first case of HTR caused by anti-Sc2 confirmed by clinical findings and MMA.

A LU:-16 individual with antibodies.

CONCLUSIONS: Antibodies against Lutheran blood group antigens have been observed during first-time pregnancy. Samples from a woman of African descent were tested in our immunohematology laboratory on several occasions since 2001. Her samples were phenotyped as Lu(a+b-), and anti-Lub was suspected but not identified. She was asked to make autologous donations in preparation for her delivery, which she did. In 2010, two antibodies were identified: anti-Lea and -Lub. Six years later, a third investigation was requested. This time, an antibody directed at a high-prevalence Lutheran antigen was found in addition to the anti-Lea and -Lub previously observed. Her serum was compatible with three out of five Lu(a-b-) reagent red blood cells (RBCs). One of the incompatible Lu(a-b-) reagent RBCs was known to be In(Lu) (KLF1 mutation). The genetic background of the other reagent RBC was unknown. The LU cDNA sequence analysis revealed the presence of the c.230G>A (Lua), c.679C>T (LU:-16), and a silent polymorphism c.1227G>T. Anti-Lu16 was highly suspected. This would be the fifth case of LU:-16 with antibodies reported, all within women of African heritage with the Lu(a+b-) phenotype. Hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn was not noted in these cases.