International research priorities on the role of cognition in power mobility device use: In pursuit of informed clinical practices and knowledge translation.

Cognition is an important factor affecting power mobility device (PMD) use. However, a gap in knowledge on the role of cognition in PMD use limits evidence of best practices for screening, assessment, and training. The overall goal of this research activity was to identify strategic research priorities to delineate the next steps in research. Following the Collaborative Prioritized Planning Process (CP3), a 1.5-day meeting was held with an interdisciplinary and international team of assistive technology users, clinicians, service providers, and researchers with expertise in PMD use and cognition. Our four-stage process included: knowledge synthesis; identification and prioritization of challenges; identification, consolidation, and prioritization of solutions; and action planning. Five of 14 challenges for research on cognition and PMD use were prioritized, and five solutions (of the 100 generated) perceived to be the most impactful were selected as the focus for the remainder of the meeting. The resulting prioritized solutions included, improving knowledge translation of existing and new evidence, profiling and addressing individualized needs, creating and evaluating training tools, development of practice guidelines, and validating and developing evaluation tools or toolkit. Preliminary action planning facilitated discussion of potential future projects, initiated new research collaborations and partnerships, and provided a foundation to build a program of research for investigating the role of cognition in PMD use.

Use of a dynamic arm support to drive a power wheelchair: a case report.

PURPOSE: Dynamic arm supports (DAS) can assist individuals with severe upper limb disabilities who use a wheelchair to accomplish their daily activities. The objective of this case series was to assess the potential of a DAS to improve power wheelchair (PWC) control in real-life contexts and to describe the integration process. A secondary objective was to explore factors that may influence the DAS integration process. METHODS: This case series includes four participants fitted with the Kinova DAS O110. A one-year follow-up was planned for each participant with qualitative and quantitative data collection to assess DAS outcomes. Assessment methods were selected to cover the three vantages of assistive technology outcomes assessment: effectiveness, subjective well-being, and social significance. RESULTS: Among the four participants, one used the DAS to help with his wheelchair control for at least 12 months (successful integration). For him, the DAS led to significantly improved wheelchair skills and an important positive psychosocial impact. He was, however, only able to use the DAS for PWC control (no effects on other daily activities), and could not use it in some contexts because the device increased his PWC width. As for the other participants, they stopped using the DAS for different reasons, including a DAS-related adverse event. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated that a wheelchair-bound DAS has the potential to improve PWC use, but successful integration requires specific factors. The service delivery process and the environmental accessibility are crucial for the successful integration of such a device and to avoid safety issues.IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATIONNo study deeply assessed the impacts of dynamic arm support on power wheelchair control, and the associated facilitators and obstacles.A wheelchair-bound dynamic arm support has the potential to improve power wheelchair control for individuals with upper limb disabilities and to lead to positive psychosocial impacts if some conditions conductive to successful integration are met.The service delivery process and the environmental accessibility appear as crucial aspects for the successful integration of a new device, such as dynamic arm support and avoiding safety issues.