Sixty-One Volatiles Have Phylogenetic Signals Across Bacterial Domain and Fungal Kingdom.

Microorganisms are diverse in their genome sequences and subsequently in their encoded metabolic pathways, which enabled them to adapt to numerous environmental conditions. They produce thousands of small molecules, many of which are volatiles in nature and play important roles in signaling in intra- and inter-species to kingdom and domain interactions, survival, or virulence. Many of these compounds have been studied, characterized, and organized in the mVOC 2.0 database. However, such dataset has not been investigated comprehensively in terms of its phylogeny to determine key volatile markers for certain taxa. It was hypothesized that some of the volatiles described in the mVOC 2.0 database could function as a phylogenetic signal since their production is conserved among certain taxa within the microbial evolutionary tree. Our meta-analysis revealed that some volatiles were produced by a large number of bacteria but not in fungal genera such as dimethyl disulfide, acetic acid, 2-nonanone, dimethyl trisulfide, 2-undecanone, isovaleric acid, 2-tridecanone, propanoic acid, and indole (common bacterial compounds). In contrast, 1-octen-3-ol, 3-octanone, and 2-pentylfuran (common fungal compounds) were produced primarily by fungal genera. Such chemical information was further confirmed by investigating genomic data of publicly available databases revealing that bacteria or fungi harbor gene families involved in these volatiles' biosynthesis. Our phylogenetic signal testing identified 61 volatiles with a significant phylogenetic signal as demonstrated by phylogenetic D statistic P-value < 0.05. Thirty-three volatiles were phylogenetically conserved in the bacterial domain (e.g., cyclocitral) compared to 17 volatiles phylogenetically conserved in the fungal kingdom (e.g., aristolochene), whereas 11 volatiles were phylogenetically conserved in genera from both bacteria and fungi (e.g., geosmin). These volatiles belong to different chemical classes such as heterocyclic compounds, long-chain fatty acids, sesquiterpenoids, and aromatics. The performed approaches serve as a starting point to investigate less explored volatiles with potential roles in signaling, antimicrobial therapy, or diagnostics.

mVOC 2.0: a database of microbial volatiles.

Metabolic capabilities of microorganisms include the production of secondary metabolites (e.g. antibiotics). The analysis of microbial volatile organic compounds (mVOCs) is an emerging research field with huge impact on medical, agricultural and biotechnical applied and basic science. The mVOC database (v1) has grown with microbiome research and integrated species information with data on emitted volatiles. Here, we present the mVOC 2.0 database with about 2000 compounds from almost 1000 species and new features to work with the database. The extended collection of compounds was augmented with data regarding mVOC-mediated effects on plants, fungi, bacteria and (in-)vertebrates. The mVOC database 2.0 now features a mass spectrum finder, which allows a quick mass spectrum comparison for compound identification and the generation of species-specific VOC signatures. Automatic updates, useful links and search for mVOC literature are also included. The mVOC database aggregates and refines available information regarding microbial volatiles, with the ultimate aim to provide a comprehensive and informative platform for scientists working in this research field. To address this need, we maintain a publicly available mVOC database at: http://bioinformatics.charite.de/mvoc.

A meta-analysis approach for assessing the diversity and specificity of belowground root and microbial volatiles.

Volatile organic compounds are secondary metabolites emitted by all organisms, especially by plants and microbes. Their role as aboveground signals has been established for decades. Recent evidence suggests that they might have a non-negligible role belowground and might be involved in root-root and root-microbial/pest interactions. Our aim here was to make a comprehensive review of belowground volatile diversity using a meta-analysis approach. At first we synthesized current literature knowledge on plant root volatiles and classified them in terms of chemical diversity. In a second step, relying on the mVOC database of microbial volatiles, we classified volatiles based on their emitters (bacteria vs. fungi) and their specific ecological niche (i.e., rhizosphere, soil). Our results highlight similarities and differences among root and microbial volatiles and also suggest that some might be niche specific. We further explored the possibility that volatiles might be involved in intra- and inter-specific root-root communication and discuss the ecological implications of such scenario. Overall this work synthesizes current knowledge on the belowground volatilome and the potential signaling role of its constituents. It also highlights that the total diversity of belowground volatiles might be orders of magnitude larger that the few hundreds of compounds described to date.