Examining the Role of Nonsurgical Therapy in the Treatment of Geriatric Urinary Incontinence.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the role of physical function impairments on the change in urinary incontinence (UI) symptoms after pelvic floor muscle training in older women. METHODS: This is a prospective cohort study of 70 community-dwelling participants, older than age 70 years, with at least moderate incontinence symptoms. A comprehensive pelvic floor and physical function assessment was done at baseline. Individualized pelvic floor muscle training prescriptions with behavioral management strategies to reduce incontinence episodes were provided for 12 weeks. Baseline physical function was determined using the SPPB (Short Physical Performance Battery). A total score of 9 or lower out of 12 indicated impaired physical function, and scores higher than 9 indicated normal physical function. A 3-day bladder diary established daily incontinence episodes. The between-group difference in the change in number of UI episodes, from baseline to 6 weeks, was our primary outcome. Descriptive analyses compared important demographic and clinical characteristics. Longitudinal mixed model linear regression analyses determined the change in incontinence episodes and estimates of improvement based on the presence of impaired physical function and adjusted for age, race, and body mass index (BMI). RESULTS: Participants' mean±SD age was 76.9±5.4 years, and 15.7% identified as African American, with no significant differences in age or race between groups. Participants with impaired physical function had higher mean±SD BMI (33.6±14.5 vs 27.4±5.8; P=.03) and more baseline incontinence episodes (4.5±2.9 vs 2.7±2.1 episodes per day; P=.005) than in women without functional impairment. After 6 weeks of pelvic floor exercises, the change in number of incontinence episodes per day was not different between participants with physical functional impairment compared with women with normal physical function (mean [95% CI] -1.2 [-2.0 to -0.5] vs -0.4 [-1.1 to 0.3], P=.31). Overall, after 12 weeks of pelvic floor muscle training, complete satisfaction with incontinence symptom improvement was low for both groups (41.8% with physical function impairments vs 44.8% with normal physical function; P=.90). CONCLUSION: Behavioral therapy including pelvic floor muscle training may not significantly decrease UI symptoms to a degree that is satisfactory in women who are older than 70 years and are seeking treatment for UI, regardless of the presence of physical function impairments. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03057834.

Gait speed response to aerobic versus resistance exercise training in older adults.

BACKGROUND: Little is known about the comparative effect of aerobic training (AT) versus resistance training (RT) on gait speed, a strong predictor of disability. AIMS: To compare the effect of AT versus RT on gait speed and other functional measures. METHODS: Overweight and obese [body mass index (BMI) ≥27.0 kg/m2] sedentary men and women aged 65-79 years engaged in 5 months of either 4 days/weeks moderate-intensity treadmill walking, AT, (n = 44) or 3 days/weeks moderate-intensity RT (n = 56). Usual-pace gait speed, fast-pace gait speed and short physical performance battery (SPPB) were evaluated in all participants before and after training. Peak oxygen consumption (VO2peak) was assessed in AT participants only, and knee extensor strength was assessed in RT participants. RESULTS: Both AT and RT resulted in clinically significant improvements in usual-pace gait speed (0.08 ± 0.14 and 0.08 ± 0.17 m/s, respectively, both p < 0.05) and SPPB (0.53 ± 1.40 and 0.53 ± 1.20 points, both p < 0.05) and chair rise time (-1.2 ± 3.2 and -1.7 ± 3.0 s, p < 0.05). Only AT improved fast-pace gait speed (0.11 ± 0.10 m/s, p < 0.05). In the RT participants, lower baseline knee strength was associated with less improvement in usual-pace gait speed. In AT participants, lower baseline VO2peak was associated with less improvement in chair rise time and self-reported disability. DISCUSSION: While both AT and RT improved usual-pace gait speed, only AT improved fast-pace gait speed. Lower baseline fitness was associated with less improvement with training. CONCLUSION: Research to directly compare which mode of training elicits the maximum improvement in older individuals with specific functional deficits could lead to better intervention targeting.