RESUMO
The Stroop test is based on interference between reading and naming of incongruent color words. To decide whether this conflict was of perceptual or motor origin, event-related potentials were simultaneously recorded. Since the components of these potentials are dependent on the progression of information processing, their changes related with the nature of the stimulation should provide information about the mechanisms underlying the conflict. Evoked potentials were recorded from three midline leads in 18 healthy subjects during reading and naming tasks. The 216 stimulations were the words "red, green and blue" presented in either a congruent or incongruent color, or in a neutral color. The behavioral Stroop effect did not affect the P300 latency, suggesting that the conflict occurs in the motor system. This was supported by the presence of a premotor negativity for incongruent stimulations, occurring between 400 and 205 ms before button press, and present in the naming condition only. Moreover, for the two conditions, congruent stimulations evoked positive potentials between 260 and 310 ms at the level of the occipital lead for reading and at the level of the frontal lead for naming. The possibility of an interaction of specialized channels for stimulation analysis at an early level is raised.