Admission of patients with acute urinary retention leads to a definitive management decision.

BACKGROUND: Acute urinary retention (AUR) is a common urologic emergency. However, its management is not standardized due to lack of clinical guidelines. AIMS: We retrospectively reviewed the treatment of all male patients admitted to our institution with AUR over 12 months. METHODS: Data was obtained from the HIPE (Hospital Inpatient Enquiry) data system, each patient's electronic discharge summary and from patient medical records. RESULTS: There were 130 AUR admissions during the period. About 74 admissions were due to benign prostatic enlargement (BPE). Of these, 45.9% (n = 34) passed their trial without catheter (TWOC). The remainder (n = 40) failed their TWOC necessitating recatheterization and consideration for transurethral resection of prostate (TURP) or re-TWOC. An indwelling urinary catheter (IDC) was inserted for 27.5% (n = 11) of patients with a failed TWOC secondary to comorbidities. This group had a mean age of 78 years (range 68-96 years). Of those who failed their TWOC, 32.5% (n = 13) had a TURP on index admission. Of the remaining 16 patients with failed TWOC, 75% (n = 12) were discharged with an IDC and readmitted for an elective TURP with a median waiting time of 55 days (range 17-138 days). 18.75% (n = 3) passed a re-TWOC and thus offset the need to have any surgical intervention and 6.25% (n = 1) proceeded to a radical retropubic prostatectomy for biopsy proven prostate adenocarcinoma. CONCLUSION: Admission of patients with acute urinary retention leads to a definitive management decision and reduced prolonged catheterization.

The sentinel stent? A systematic review of the role of prophylactic ureteric stenting prior to colorectal resections.

PURPOSE: 'Prophylactic' ureteric stents potentially reduce rates, and facilitate intraoperative recognition, of iatrogenic ureteric injury (IUI) during colorectal resections. A lack of consensus surrounds the risk-benefit equation of this practice, and we aimed to assess the evidence base. METHODS: A systematic review was performed according to PRISMA guidelines. MEDLINE, Scopus, EMBASE and Cochrane databases were searched using terms 'ureteric/ureteral/JJ/Double J stent' or 'ureteric/ureteral catheter' and 'colorectal/prophylactic/resection/diverticular disease/diverticulitis/iatrogenic injury'. Primary outcomes were rates of ureteric injuries and their intraoperative identification. Secondary outcomes included stent complication rates. RESULTS: We identified 987 publications; 22 papers met the inclusion criteria. No randomised controlled trials were found. The total number of patients pooled for evaluation was 869,603 (102,370 with ureteric stents/catheters, 767,233 controls). The most frequent indications for prophylactic stents were diverticular disease (45.38%), neoplasia (33.45%) and inflammatory bowel disease (9.37%). Pooled results saw IUI in 1521/102,370 (1.49%) with, and in 1333/767,233 (0.17%) without, prophylactic ureteric stents. Intraoperative recognition of IUIs occurred in 10/16 injuries (62.5%) with prophylactic stents, versus 9/17 (52.94%) without stents (p = 0.579). The most serious complications of prophylactic stent use were ureteric injury (2/1716, 0.12%) and transient ureteric obstruction following stent removal (13/666, 1.95%). CONCLUSIONS: Placement of prophylactic ureteric stents has a low complication rate. There is insufficient evidence to conclude that stents decrease ureteric injury or increase intraoperative detection of IUIs. Apparently higher rates of IUI in stented patients likely reflect use in higher risk resections. A prospective registry with harmonised data collection points and stratification of intraoperative risk is needed.

Efficacy of urodynamic studies in predicting long-term outcomes of the transobturator tape: do they augment clinical assessment?

INTRODUCTION: Some controversy exists regarding necessity for urodynamic evaluation prior to surgical management of stress urinary incontinence (SUI). We aimed to interrogate the role of pre and post-operative urodynamic studies versus clinical assessment in predicting long-term patient reported outcomes of transobturator tape (TOT) placement. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A 100 patient cohort of women post TOT insertion for stress/mixed urinary incontinence 2005-2010, under a single surgeon, was identified. Results of pre and post-operative clinical assessment and urodynamic studies were retrospectively evaluated. Long-term patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) were assessed using the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire (ICIQ) Short Form, Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGI-S) and Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) questionnaires. The role of urodynamic studies in predicting postoperative voiding dysfunction, and long-term procedure outcomes was analysed. Statistical correlations were performed using SPSS. RESULTS: Questionnaire response rate was 76/100 (76%) at mean follow-up 9.4 years (7.25-12.75). Mean ICIQ score was 6.32 (1-20). No significant correlations between preoperative pDet QMax and postoperative uroflow/duration of intermittent self catheterisation (ISC), or between preoperative leak-point pressures and outcome were observed. Postoperative urodynamic tests did not reliably predict long-term success in SUI cure. Preoperative clinical urgency was a more reliable predictor of long-term clinical urgency than urodynamic detrusor overactivity. Whilst patients with mixed urinary incontinence at long-term follow-up tended to have the highest (worst) overall ICIQ-SF and ICIQ quality of life score, no studied variables on preoperative CMG were significantly correlated with long-term PROMs. CONCLUSIONS: Whilst urodynamic studies provide important baseline bladder function data, prior to mid-urethral sling placement, this study finds no specific value of either pre or postoperative urodynamics in predicting long-term patient reported outcomes of transobturator tape placement.

Can we avoid surgery in elderly patients with renal masses by using the Charlson comorbidity index?

OBJECTIVE To determine the safety of surveillance for localized contrast-enhancing renal masses in elderly patients whose comorbidities precluded invasive management; to provide an insight into the natural history of small enhancing renal masses; and to aid the clinician in identifying those patients who are most suitable for a non-interventional approach. PATIENTS AND METHODS We conducted a retrospective chart review of 26 consecutive patients (16 men and 10 women), who were followed for > or =1 year, with localized solid enhancing renal masses between 1998 and 2006. These patients were unfit or unwilling to undergo radical or partial nephrectomy. None had their tumours surgically removed. Study variables included age, presentation, tumour size, growth rate, Charlson comorbidity index (CMI) and available pathological data. RESULTS The mean (range) patient age was 78.14 (63-89) year, with a mean follow-up of 28.1 (12-72) months. The mean tumour size was 4.25 (2.5-8.7) cm at diagnosis. The tumour growth rate was 0.44 cm/year; among smaller masses (T1a) it was 0.15 cm/year, vs 0.64 cm/year in the larger masses (T1b and T2). The mean CMI was 2.96. There were 11 deaths overall; 10 patients died from unrelated illnesses. One death was directly attributable to metastatic renal cancer; this patient had an initial tumour diameter of 5.4 cm and a CMI of 6. All patients who died had a CMI of > or =3. CONCLUSIONS Elderly patients with small renal tumours (T1a) and comorbidity scores of > or =3 were more likely to die as a result of their comorbidities rather than the renal tumour. Surveillance of small renal masses appears to be a safe alternative in elderly patients who are poor surgical candidates, where the overall growth rate appears to be slow.