Leveraging National Nursing Home Huddles for Rapid COVID-19 Response.

A disproportionate number of older adult residents of U.S. nursing homes have died during the COVID-19 pandemic. The novelty of the virus spurred frequently changing guidance as nursing facilities navigated response efforts. In May 2020, the 6-month COVID-19 Rapid Response Network for Nursing Homes (RRN) was launched to leverage the concept of huddles across U.S. nursing homes to reduce COVID-19-related morbidity, mortality, and transmission by identifying best practices to rapidly implement, fostering connections between nursing homes, and refocusing the national narrative on optimism for nursing home care response efforts. Daily 20-min huddles transitioned to twice weekly in the program's final two months. A total of 93 huddles featured 103 speakers with 1960 participants engaging in both live huddles and asynchronous learning. 90.33% of participants said they learned at least two new ideas by participating and 89.17% strongly agreed or agreed that participating improved their ability to lead change in their organization. Qualitative data echoed gratitude for a centralized source of information and best practices and the sense of positivity and community the RRN provided. Leveraging nursing home huddles at the national, regional, local, system, or facility level may serve as a guidepost for future pandemics or work where guidance is new or quickly evolving.

An initiative to improve the management of clinically significant test results in a large health care network.

BACKGROUND: The failure of providers to communicate and follow up clinically significant test results (CSTR) is an important threat to patient safety. The Massachusetts Coalition for the Prevention of Medical Errors has endorsed the creation of systems to ensure that results can be received and acknowledged. METHODS: In 2008 a task force was convened that represented clinicians, laboratories, radiology, patient safety, risk management, and information systems in a large health care network with the goals of providing recommendations and a road map for improvement in the management of CSTR and of implementing this improvement plan during the sub-force sequent five years. In drafting its charter, the task broadened the scope from "critical" results to "clinically significant" ones; clinically significant was defined as any result that requires further clinical action to avoid morbidity or mortality, regardless of the urgency of that action. RESULTS: The task force recommended four key areas for improvement--(1) standardization of policies and definitions, (2) robust identification of the patient's care team, (3) enhanced results management/tracking systems, and (4) centralized quality reporting and metrics. The task force faced many challenges in implementing these recommendations, including disagreements on definitions of CSTR and on who should have responsibility for CSTR, changes to established work flows, limitations of resources and of existing information systems, and definition of metrics. CONCLUSIONS: This large-scale effort to improve the communication and follow-up of CSTR in a health care network continues with ongoing work to address implementation challenges, refine policies, prepare for a new clinical information system platform, and identify new ways to measure the extent of this important safety problem.

Factors associated with radiologists' adherence to Fleischner Society guidelines for management of pulmonary nodules.

PURPOSE: In 2005, the Fleischner Society guidelines (FSG) for managing pulmonary nodules detected on CT scans were published. The aim of this study was to evaluate adherence to the FSG, adjusting for demographic and clinical variables that may contribute to adherence. METHODS: Radiology reports were randomly obtained for 1,100 chest and abdominal CT scans performed between January and June 2010 in a tertiary hospital's emergency department and outpatient clinics. An automated document retrieval system using natural language processing was used to identify patients with pulmonary nodules from the data set. Features relevant to evaluating variation in adherence to the FSG, including age, sex, race, nodule size, and scan site (eg, the emergency department) and type, were extracted by manual review from reports retrieved using natural language processing. All variables were entered into a logistic regression model. RESULTS: Three hundred fifteen reports were identified to have pulmonary nodules, 75 of which were for patients with concurrent malignancies or aged < 35 years. Of the remaining 240 reports, 34% of recommendations for pulmonary nodules were adherent to the FSG. Nodule size demonstrated an association with guideline adherence, with adherence highest in the >4-mm to 6-mm nodule group (P = .04) and progressively diminishing for smaller and bigger nodules. CONCLUSIONS: Pulmonary nodules are prevalent findings on chest and abdominal CT scans. Although most radiologists recommend follow-up imaging for these findings, recommendations for pulmonary nodules were consistent with the FSG in 34% of radiology reports. Nodule size demonstrated an association with guideline adherence, after adjusting for key variables.