Management of lateral epicondylitis.

Lateral epicondylitis is the most common cause of lateral elbow pain. Although also known as tennis elbow, lateral epicondylitis often develops as a work-related condition and therefore constitutes a major public health issue. This article reviews the pathophysiological factors involved in lateral epicondylitis, as well as the tools available for establishing the diagnosis and ruling out other causes of lateral elbow pain. Finally, the non-operative and surgical treatment options are discussed in detail.

Prospective comparative analysis of arthroscopic debridement for primary and post-traumatic elbow osteoarthritis.

INTRODUCTION: The main aim of the present study was to compare the preoperative profiles and the efficacy of arthroscopic debridement for elbow osteoarthritis between patients with primary versus post-traumatic osteoarthritis. The study hypothesis was that the two groups would show no difference on either criterion. METHOD: In the framework of a symposium of the French Arthroscopy Society (SFA), a prospective comparative multicenter study included 87 patients with 6 months' follow-up of arthroscopic debridement for elbow osteoarthritis: 53 primary (G1) and 34 secondary (G2). Pre- and post-operative clinical assessment in both groups compared Andrews-Carson specific functional score for elbow osteoarthritis (main endpoint), and the QuickDash (QD), Patient-Related Elbow Evaluation (PREE) and Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS) functional scores, pain on VAS, range of motion (RoM) and strength. RESULTS: Arthroscopic debridement significantly improved all functional scores at 6 months, notably including the specific Andrews-Carson score, which showed gain in both groups: 68.5±28.7 (range, -5 to 110) in G1 and 62.6±25.4 (18 to 110) in G2 (P=0.35). Pain decreased significantly in both groups, by 5.1±2.6 points (range, 10 to 1) in G1 and 4.4±2.7 points (range, 8.5 to 1) in G2 (P=0.28). RoM in flexion-extension improved comparably in both groups, by 42.9±22.1 (-15 to 105) in G1 and 49.3±24.5 (10 to 90) in G2 (P=0.22). Strength in flexion improved comparably, by 7.6±4.7kg (-2 to 17.5) in G1 and 6.1±4.8kg (-1 to 13) in G2 (P=0.23). DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION: The study hypothesis was confirmed: there were no differences according to primary versus secondary osteoarthritis in preoperative profile or results. Elbow osteoarthritis entails mechanical impingement. Arthroscopic debridement gave good results independently of primary or post-traumatic etiology. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III, prospective comparative observational multicenter cohort study.

Arthroscopic debridement for osteoarthritis of the elbow: Results and analysis of predictive factors.

INTRODUCTION: Osteoarthritis is the second most frequent cause of elbow stiffness, after trauma sequelae. Surgical treatment mainly consists of debridement. The main aim of the present study was to assess the efficacy of arthroscopic treatment of osteoarthritis of the elbow on Andrews-Carson score. Secondary objectives comprised assessment of the impact of associated procedures and of epidemiological factors on functional results. METHOD: A prospective multicenter study involving 8 centers, in a symposium held by the French Society of Arthroscopy (SFA), included patients treated by arthroscopy for primary or secondary osteoarthritis of the elbow between January 2017 and March 2018, with a minimum 6 months' follow-up. Clinical assessment was based on change in Andrews-Carson functional score (AC), specific to osteoarthritis of the elbow, and on other functional scores: QuickDash (QD), Patient-Rated Elbow Evaluation (PREE), Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS) and Self-Evaluation Elbow (SEE). Progression in pain on visual analog scale (VAS) and range of motion (RoM) was also assessed. Initial imaging work-up comprised standard X-ray and CT arthrography; paraclinical follow-up was based on X-ray. The impact of the following procedures associated to arthroscopic debridement was analyzed: radial head resection, ulnar nerve release, humeral fenestration, lateral ramp release, and medial collateral ligament posterior bundle release. The functional impact of epidemiological factors (age, handedness, manual occupation, smoking, body-mass index, and work accident/occupational disease status) and radiographic factors (foreign bodies, joint impingement, osteophytes, and fossa filling) was also assessed. RESULTS: The series comprised 87 patients: 75 male (86.2%); mean age, 49 years (range, 18-73 years). Arthroscopic debridement significantly improved all functional scores at a minimum 6 months, and notably the specific AC score: 113.6±25.4 (40-180) versus 178.7±20.2 (110-200) (P<0.0001). Pain diminished significantly: 6.4±2.1 (0-10) versus 1.7±1.8 (0-8) (P<0.0001). RoM increased significantly: flexion/extension, 93.44±20.5° (5-130°) versus 124.2±13.8° (90-160°) (P<0.0001); pronation/supination, 147.6±25.6° (60-180°) versus 162.5±20.6° (100-180°) (P<0.0001). Strength (kg) increased in flexion (8.8±4.0 (4 to 20) versus 15.3±5.1 (3 to 32) (P<0.0008) and in grip [33.1±12.3 (10 to 58) versus 42.1±14.0 (2 to 68) (P<0.0001)]. Epidemiologically, males showed better recovery than females for both pain and strength. There was a significant positive impact of manual work on functional recovery, pain and also strength. There was a significant negative impact of work-accident/occupational disease on pain and strength. Regarding associated procedures, lateral ramp debridement improved AC score, with a gain of 75.4±25.3 points (-5 to 110) vs. 49.6±23.5 (10 to 100) (P<0.0001), and pain on VAS, with a fall of -5.6±2.1 points (-10 to -1) vs. -3.6±3.0 (-8.5 to 1) (P=0.0013). Ulnar nerve release, radial head resection and humeral fenestration had no positive impact. Preoperative foreign body was a factor for good prognosis. Cartilage wear, especially in the humeroulnar compartment, was associated with poorer functional results. DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION: Arthroscopic treatment of osteoarthritis of the elbow significantly improved clinical results at 6 months, with significant improvements in functional scores, pain, strength and range of motion. Gender, type of work and work-accident/occupational disease status influenced clinical results. Lateral ramp release is an often overlooked technical factor improving functional results. Radiologically, the best candidates are those presenting with a foreign body and no humeroulnar impingement. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III, Prospective observational multicenter cohort study.

Can preoperative imaging predict the outcomes after arthroscopic release for elbow arthritis?

INTRODUCTION: The primary symptoms of elbow osteoarthritis are the progressive development of stiffness along with pain at the end range of motion due to osteophyte impingement. Surgical treatment involves resecting these "bone stops". In the literature, these osteophytic lesions are more common than cartilage lesions, which suggests they may occur beforehand. The aim of our study was to confirm osteophytes are more common than cartilage lesions, and also to establish a link between these lesions and the functional outcomes. METHODS: This was a prospective multicenter (8 hospitals) study conducted in the context of a symposium of the Francophone Arthroscopy Society (SFA). Eighty-seven patients with elbow osteoarthritis treated by arthroscopic release were included. The clinical outcomes (range of motion in flexion, extension and pronation-supination; strength; pain at rest and during activity; satisfaction; Andrews and Carson score; QuickDASH, Patient-Rated Elbow Evaluation (PREE), Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS), Self-Evaluation Elbow (SEE) were determined before the procedure and at the 6-month follow-up visit. A standard radiographic assessment was done before the surgery and at the last follow-up visit. A CT arthrogram was done before the procedure. The presence of joint narrowing, osteophytes, filling of fossa along with secondary osteochondroma was evaluated in terms of their location, severity, size and/or number. The presence of radial head subluxation was recorded. The Bröberg & Morrey and Rettig & Hastings classification systems were applied. All the postoperative clinical data along with their change (difference between preoperative and postoperative values) were compared to the imaging findings. RESULTS: Osteophytes were found in 95% of our patients. They were located at the olecranon in 85% of cases and at the coronoid process in 81%. Filled fossae found in 94% of cases. The olecranon, coronoid and radial fossa were filled in 83%, 80% and 60% of elbows, respectively. On the initial X-rays, joint narrowing was found in 68% of elbows. CT arthrogram identified narrowing in 70% of cases. Narrowing was present in the humeroradial joint in 60% of cases and in the humeroulnar joint in 23% of cases. The presence of joint narrowing on CT arthrogram was a negative prognostic factor for pain during activity (p<0.05) along with the Quick DASH (p<0.01) and PREE (p<0.05). Involvement of the humeroradial joint impacted pain at rest (p<0.01). Narrowing of the humeroulnar joint was associated with worse outcomes in terms of pain at rest (p<0.05) and during activity (p<0.05), QuickDASH (p<0.005), MEPS (p<0.05), PREE (p<0.05) and the SEE (p<0.05). The presence of loose bodies before the procedure was associated with better outcomes in terms of pain at rest (p<0.05), QuickDASH (p<0.001), MEPS (p<0.001), Andrews & Carson score (p<0.05) and PREE (p<0.005). The osteoarthritis stage in the Bröberg & Morrey or the Rettig & Hastings classification systems did not impact the various clinical parameters or functional outcome scores. DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION: In the imaging work-up, signs of impingement (osteophytes and filling of fossa) are more common than signs of joint narrowing. The presence of humeroulnar and/or humeroradial impingement when there are no cartilage lesions visible may correspond to a pre-arthritic stage. The outcomes of arthroscopic release are better in elbows with isolated impingement than in those with cartilage lesions, especially at the humeroulnar joint. Excision of secondary osteochondromas is also an excellent surgical indication. Current classification systems cannot be used to determine the prognosis before arthroscopic release of elbow osteoarthritis cases. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III, Prospective multicenter observational cohort study.

The lateralization and distalization shoulder angles are important determinants of clinical outcomes in reverse shoulder arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) designs vary in the lateralization and distalization geometry, which may affect functional outcomes. The purpose was to determine the effect of RSA lateralization and distalization on final functional outcomes by using the "lateralization shoulder angle" (LSA) and the "distalization shoulder angle" (DSA). METHODS: Forty-six consecutive patients who underwent RSA for cuff tear arthropathy were retrospectively evaluated. Functional outcome and radiographs were evaluated at a minimum of 2 years postoperatively and compared between implants with or without glenoid lateralization and with or without humeral-sided lateralization. Anteroposterior shoulder radiographs were used to evaluate the LSA and DSA. RESULTS: Both angles showed substantial to almost perfect intrarater and inter-rater agreement. Higher LSA values were found in more lateralized RSAs (P = .027), and values between 75° and 95° were correlated with better active external rotation (quadratic regression analysis R2 = 0.553, P < .001). Postoperative active anterior elevation (R2 = 0.2, P = .008), Constant (rs = 0.29, P = .05), and Activities of Daily Living Requiring External Rotation scores (rs = 0.4 P = .007) had a positive correlation with the LSA. The quadratic regression analysis also showed that a DSA between 40° and 65° resulted in better active anterior elevation (R2 = 0.4, P < .001) and abduction (R2 = 0.4, P < .001). The negative correlation between the LSA and DSA (rs = -0.7, P < .001) revealed that, according to the implant used, the more distally the RSA is placed the less lateralization is achieved. CONCLUSIONS: The LSA and the DSA are reproducible measurements that may be used to estimate "lateralization and distalization" after RSA. These measurements are correlated with postoperative clinical outcomes.

Long Head of the Biceps as a Suitable Available Local Tissue Autograft for Superior Capsular Reconstruction: "The Chinese Way".

Massive irreparable rotator cuff tears remain a challenging condition during daily clinical practice. Irreversible fatty infiltration of muscles and excessive chronic retraction of tendons predispose to high failure rates of their surgical treatment. Superior capsular reconstruction with either fascia lata autograft or a dermal allograft patch is a newly described solution that could prevent superior humeral head migration and restore the anteroposterior shoulder muscle force couples. The purpose of this article is to propose a technical modification of superior capsular reconstruction using long head of the biceps tendon autograft. The tendon's insertion into the glenoid is left intact, whereas laterally, it is tenotomized, transferred, and sutured with anchors onto the footprint of the supraspinatus tendon acting as a superior static stabilizer of the shoulder joint. Although this surgical modification has theoretical biological advantages, could be performed with the least technical demands, and simplifies the original demanding procedure, further prospective studies with large cohort populations and long-term follow-up are necessary to establish its effectiveness.

Arthroscopic arthrodesis of the shoulder in brachial plexus palsy.

BACKGROUND: Shoulder arthroscopic arthrodesis is an uncommon and non-standardized procedure. Results are poorly evaluated. We describe the findings in 8 patients who underwent shoulder arthroscopic arthrodesis for brachial plexus injury. METHODS: The humeral head and glenoid were excised through standard arthroscopic portals. A Hoffmann external fixator and cannulated screws were used to stabilize the shoulder. Standard clinical assessment and radiographic evaluation were performed each month until bony fusion occurred. With a mean follow-up of 28 months, functional evaluation included pain level (on a 0- to 10-mm visual analog scale); American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons index; Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score; and Simple Shoulder Test score. Mobility was systematically investigated. Blood loss was assessed by measuring hematocrit proportion. RESULTS: Glenohumeral fusion was achieved in all 8 patients. The mean time to arthrodesis was 3 months (range, 2-8 months). At last follow-up, the mean pain level was 1 (range, 0-4); the mean American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score was 69; the mean Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score was 36; and the mean Simple Shoulder Test score was 4. Mean active flexion and abduction were 80° (range, 60°-90°) and 59° (range, 40°-80°), respectively. Mean blood loss during the perioperative period was 432 mL (range, 246-792 mL). We observed one superficial wound infection and one migration of an acromiohumeral screw. These complications did not compromise the final results. CONCLUSIONS: Arthroscopic arthrodesis of the shoulder can be a reliable procedure and associated with a low rate of complications.

Nerve stress during reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: a cadaveric study.

BACKGROUND: Neurologic lesions are relatively common after total shoulder arthroplasty. These injuries are mostly due to traction. We aimed to identify the arm manipulations and steps during reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) that affect nerve stress. METHODS: Stress was measured in 10 shoulders of 5 cadavers by use of a tensiometer on each nerve from the brachial plexus, with shoulders in different arm positions and during different surgical steps of RTSA. RESULTS: When we studied shoulder position without prostheses, relative to the neutral position, internal rotation increased stress on the radial and axillary nerves and external rotation increased stress on the musculocutaneous, median, and ulnar nerves. Extension was correlated with increase in stress on all nerves. Abduction was correlated with increase in stress for the radial nerve. We identified 2 high-risk steps during RTSA: humeral exposition, particularly when the shoulder was in a position of more extension, and glenoid exposition. The thickness of polyethylene humeral cups used was associated with increased nerve stress in all but the ulnar nerve. CONCLUSION: During humeral preparation, the surgeon must be careful to limit shoulder extension. Care must be taken during exposure of the glenoid. Extreme rotation and oversized implants should be avoided to minimize stretch-induced neuropathies.

Arthroscopic-assisted Acromioclavicular and Coracoclavicular Ligaments Reconstruction for Chronic Acromioclavicular Dislocations: Surgical Technique.

Chronic acromioclavicular (AC) instability is a rare posttraumatic shoulder condition that can lead to undesirable symptoms like persistent pain, muscle fatigue, loss of strength, or even scapular dyskinesis. It is well known that in these cases the superior functional results depend on the restoration of the anatomy and stability of the AC joint in both vertical and horizontal planes. Considering the ligaments degeneration and atrophy in chronic AC joint dislocations, we present an arthroscopic-assisted reconstruction of both the coracoclavicular and AC ligaments using autograft augmentation. In details the coracoclavicular ligaments component is reconstructed using the Tightrope suspension device augmented with a palmaris longus autograft and by the nonanatomic coracoacromial ligament transfer (modified Weaver-Dunn). The AC part is restored by suturing the remainder palmaris longus autograft on the acromion and on the deltotrapezial fascia. Using the construct provided by this technique all the possible ruptured ligaments are reconstructed, optimizing the vertical and horizontal stability of the area, and promising excellent long-term radiologic and functional results.

Combined Treatment of Wrist and Trapeziometacarpal Joint Arthritis.

Background Combined thumb basal and wrist joint arthritis (excluding scaphotrapeziotrapezoid arthritis) is rare considering the frequency of arthritis of either joint alone. Combined surgical treatment has never been described in the literature. Furthermore, the scaphoidectomy common to all interventions for Watson stage 2 or 3 wrist arthritis theoretically makes it impossible to perform a trapeziectomy for thumb basal joint arthritis. Question/Purpose The aim of this study was to present and analyze the results of two types of surgical treatment when both wrist and thumb arthritis was present. Materials and Methods Our retrospective series included 11 patients suffering from Eaton Stage III thumb basal joint arthritis and scapholunate advanced collapse (SLAC) II and III-type wrist arthritis. Five patients (group A) underwent trapeziectomy and palliative surgery for their wrist with conservation of the distal pole of the scaphoid (one proximal row carpectomy [PRC] and four four-corner fusions), and six (group B) patients had a trapeziometacarpal arthroplasty either with PRC (two cases) or four-corner arthrodesis (four cases) including total scaphoidectomy. Results The mean follow-up was 57 months. The overall visual analog scale (VAS) score for pain was 1.5 at rest, with no difference between the trapeziectomy and arthroplasty groups. The average Kapandji score was 9.3 (9 in group A and 9.5 in group B). The flexion/extension range of motion for the wrist was 64° following four-corner arthrodesis and 75° following PRC. Only one case of algodystrophy was observed. The radiological analysis revealed no complications. Discussion This study shows that thumb basal joint arthritis and SLAC type wrist arthritis may be treated by combined treatment during the same intervention without any complications. The results of palliative surgery for the wrist, either with trapeziectomy or with a trapeziometacarpal arthroplasty, are comparable. With a trapeziectomy, the distal pole of the scaphoid must be fused to the capitate to help stabilize the thumb column. Level of Evidence Level IV.

Radiocapitate congruency as a predictive factor for the results of proximal row carpectomy.

PURPOSE: To evaluate whether the congruency between the joint surfaces of the lunate fossa of the distal radius and the proximal capitate might be a prognostic factor for functional, clinical, or radiographic results after proximal row carpectomy (PRC). METHODS: After reconstructing the computed tomographic arthrogram of patients with PRC, we evaluated the shape of the proximal capitate by measuring the radius of curvature of the tip of the capitate. The congruency of the future radiocapitate joint was then evaluated by the radiocapitate index in the frontal and sagittal planes. This was calculated by dividing the radius of curvature of the tip of the capitate by the mean radius of curvature of the lunate fossa. We determined the relationship between these morphological results and the functional (Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand [DASH] score, Mayo Wrist score, and pain relief), clinical (mobility and strength) and x-ray results (radiocapitate arthrosis). RESULTS: A total of 27 patients were reviewed at a mean follow-up of 59 months. The shape of the proximal capitate did not affect outcomes. In the frontal plane, a better radiocapitate congruency was significantly associated with an increase in wrist flexion and better functional results for the DASH. There was a non-significant relationship between congruency and improvement of Mayo Wrist score and pain relief. In the sagittal plane, the DASH score tended to improve when congruency was better. CONCLUSIONS: The shape of the capitate was not a prognostic factor for functional outcome after PRC. The radiocapitate index seems more relevant in predicting results at last follow-up. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic II.

[Necrotizing fasciitis related to injections of morphine (Skénan(®)) in a HIV-infected patient]. / Fasciites nécrosantes liées à des injections de morphine (Skénan(®)), chez un patient infecté par le VIH.

We report here a case of necrotizing fasciitis occurred because of intravenous misuse of morphine sulfate (Skénan (®)). Several factors are pertinent: the type of infection, rare but severe, the double localization of the necrotizing fasciitis, complicated by sepsis, the patient profile (HIV-infected) and the injected substance (opiate).