Arthroscopic lateral retinacular release improves patello-femoral and femoro-tibial kinematics in patients with isolated lateral retinacular tightness.

PURPOSE: Arthroscopic lateral retinacular release (LRR) has long been considered the gold standard for the treatment for anterior knee pain caused by lateral retinacular tightness (LRT). However, one-third of patients experience continuous pain postoperatively, which is thought to be related to persistent maltracking of the patella and altered femoro-tibial kinematics. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to simultaneously assess femoro-tibial and patello-femoral kinematics and identify the influence of arthroscopic LRR. METHODS: Sixteen healthy volunteers and 12 patients with unilateral, isolated LRT were prospectively included. Open MRI scans with and without isometric quadriceps contraction were performed in 0°, 30° and 90° of knee flexion preoperatively and at 12 months after surgery. Patellar shift, tilt angle, patello-femoral contact area and magnitude of femoro-tibial rotation were calculated by digital image processing. RESULTS: Postoperatively, patellar shift was significantly reduced at 90° of knee flexion compared to preoperative values. The postoperative patellar tilt angle was found to be significantly smaller at 30° of knee flexion compared to that preoperatively. Isometric muscle contractions did not considerably influence patellar shift or tilt in either group. The patello-femoral contact area increased after LRR over the full range of motion (ROM), with significant changes at 0° and 90°. Regarding femoro-tibial kinematics, significantly increased femoral internal rotation at 0° was observed in the patient group preoperatively, whereas the magnitude of rotation at 90° of knee flexion was comparable to that of healthy individuals. The pathologically increased femoral internal rotation at 30° without muscular activity could be significantly decreased by LRR. With isometric quadriceps contraction no considerable improvement of femoral internal rotation could be achieved by LRR at 30° of knee flexion. CONCLUSIONS: Patello-femoral and femoro-tibial joint kinematics could be improved, making LRR a viable surgical option in carefully selected patients with isolated LRT. However, pathologically increased femoral internal rotation during early knee flexion remained unaffected by LRR and thus potentially accounts for persistent pain. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II.

Diagnostic algorithm in septic total knee arthroplasty failure - What is evidence-based?

Prosthetic joint infection (PJI) is among the most common differential diagnoses of total knee arthroplasty failure. It is a challenging complication, not least because of the difficulty of establishing the correct diagnosis. The fact that no single diagnostic parameter or test has been identified that can accurately rule in or out PJI has led to an evolution of similar but competing definitions of PJI on the grounds of an array of criteria. This development has had very positive effects on the scientific evaluation of various methods of PJI diagnostics and treatment because of an increased comparability. However, it can be challenging to stay abreast of the evidence these definitions are based on. Also, the definitions alone do not necessarily entail an algorithm to aid in evaluating the right criteria in a sound order to be able to use the definitions as a sensible tool. The aim of this overview is to state the most recent evidence on the diagnostic parameters included in the most established PJI definitions and to exhibit and compare the few algorithmic approaches published. Clinical symptoms of PJI are very rarely reported on in the literature, hence the evidence on their diagnostic value is poor. The only symptom that is part of the established PJI definitions is the presence of a fistula. Concerning serological markers, CRP and ESR are still the common denominator in the literature, most recently accompanied by D-Dimer as a potentially suitable marker that has been included in the most recent update of the International Consensus Meeting (ICM) criteria. Imaging plays a minor role in the diagnostic cascade because of inconsistent evidence, and no role whatsoever in the established definitions. The most important preoperative diagnostic measure is arthrocentesis and cultural and cytological analysis of the synovial fluid. The much acclaimed α-Defensin test has so far not been included in the established criteria due to inconsistent reports on its diagnostic accuracy, it is, however, in wide use and considered an optional diagnostic tool for inconclusive cases. The most diagnostic accuracy lies in the cultural and histological analysis of periprosthetic tissue biopsies, whether they are gathered in a small procedure or during arthroplasty revision. Published algorithmic approaches to PJI diagnosis are much rarer than the well-established definitions by various associations. With their PJI definition, the American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons (AAOS) published a consensus based flowchart for PJI diagnosis. Another algorithm was proposed as part of the endeavor of the MSIS and the first consensus meeting, also based on a consensus among experts. There have been two more recent publications of flowcharts based on the current evidence, one introduced at our institution in 2013, one established in 2020 by the German Society for Arthroplasty (AE).