Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Phys Med Biol ; 61(1): 430-44, 2016 Jan 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26675313

RESUMO

Treatment plans for ten patients, initially treated with a conventional approach to low dose-rate brachytherapy (LDR, 145 Gy to entire prostate), were compared with plans for the same patients created with an inverse-optimisation planning process utilising a biologically-based objective. The 'biological optimisation' considered a non-uniform distribution of tumour cell density through the prostate based on known and expected locations of the tumour. Using dose planning-objectives derived from our previous biological-model validation study, the volume of the urethra receiving 125% of the conventional prescription (145 Gy) was reduced from a median value of 64% to less than 8% whilst maintaining high values of TCP. On average, the number of planned seeds was reduced from 85 to less than 75. The robustness of plans to random seed displacements needs to be carefully considered when using contemporary seed placement techniques. We conclude that an inverse planning approach to LDR treatments, based on a biological objective, has the potential to maintain high rates of tumour control whilst minimising dose to healthy tissue. In future, the radiobiological model will be informed using multi-parametric MRI to provide a personalised medicine approach.


Assuntos
Braquiterapia/métodos , Stents Farmacológicos , Radioisótopos do Iodo/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias da Próstata/radioterapia , Compostos Radiofarmacêuticos/uso terapêutico , Planejamento da Radioterapia Assistida por Computador/métodos , Humanos , Radioisótopos do Iodo/administração & dosagem , Masculino , Tolerância a Radiação , Compostos Radiofarmacêuticos/administração & dosagem , Dosagem Radioterapêutica , Uretra/efeitos da radiação
2.
Sci Total Environ ; 332(1-3): 1-11, 2004 Oct 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15336886

RESUMO

A major product recovered from the processing and recycling of construction and demolition (C&D) debris is screened soil, also referred to as fines. A proposed reuse option for C&D debris fines is fill material, typically in construction projects as a substitute for natural soil. Waste material that is reused in a manner similar to soil must first be characterized to examine potential risks to human health and the environment. In Florida, samples of C&D debris fines from 13 C&D debris recycling facilities were characterized for 11 total and leachable heavy metal concentrations. Total metal concentration results (mg/kg) were compared to existing data on background Florida soil concentrations and to Florida's risk-based soil cleanup target levels (SCTLs). All of the detected metals were found to be elevated with respect to background. The 95% upper confidence level of arsenic from 99 samples was 3.2 mg/kg; arsenic presented the greatest limitation to reuse when compared to the SCTLs. Lead was not found to pose a major problem, likely because of the relatively new building infrastructure in Florida, which results in less demolition debris and less material impacted by lead-based paint. The results of batch leaching tests conducted using simulated rainwater (mg/l) were compared directly to risk-based groundwater levels for Florida and were found not to pose a risk using existing risk assessment policies.


Assuntos
Conservação dos Recursos Naturais , Materiais de Construção/análise , Metais Pesados/análise , Eliminação de Resíduos/métodos , Arsênio/análise , Arsênio/normas , Materiais de Construção/normas , Arquitetura de Instituições de Saúde , Florida , Metais Pesados/normas , Saúde Pública , Medição de Risco , Solo/análise , Poluentes do Solo
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...