Prevalence of musculoskeletal disorders in subjects not exposed to biomechanical overload. / Prevalenza di disturbi e patologie muscoloscheletriche in lavoratori attivi non espposti a sovraccarico biomeccanico.

BACKGROUND: Data on the prevalence of work-related musculoskeletal disorders (WMSDs) in groups of unexposed subjects may serve for comparison in studies on risk/damage in groups of exposed subjects and for the planning of preventive interventions. OBJECTIVES: To assess the musculoskeletal health status in a group of working subjects not exposed to biomechanical overload. METHODS: Medical histories were collected by occupational health physicians as part of an active health surveillance program. An ad hoc questionnaire was administered to the subjects to detect musculoskeletal disorders. RESULTS: The sample consisted of 1023 subjects (605 females and 418 males) with a mean age of 40 years. The prevalence of acute low back pain and disc hernia was 4% and 5.6% respectively; 4.3% of subjects were affected by at least one disorder of the upper limbs while the prevalence of knee disorders was 1.7%. Standardized data proved to be in line with previous studies with the exception of a greater prevalence of shoulder disorders and disc hernia. CONCLUSIONS: WMSDs occur ubiquitously across the general working population unexposed to biomechanical overload. Such findings represent a valid reference for groups of exposed working subjects, in that any excess of such disorders/pathology may be due to specific work conditions.

[Workers with Ehlers-Danlos syndrome: indications for health surveillance and suitable job assignment]. / Lavoratori con syndrome di Ehlers-Danlos: indicazioni per la sorveglianza sanitaria e per un corretto inquadramento lavorativo.

BACKGROUNDS: In Europe 23.5% of the working-age population suffers from chronic or rare diseases, including Ehlers-Danlos syndrome (EDS), an inherited disorder of the connective tissue that frequently leads to impairment also at work. OBJECTIVES: We sought to evaluate the impairment of different functional areas in EDS subjects, using EDS-Disability Test (EDS-DT) (7 visual analogical scales: pain, stiffness, daily activities of life, in the home, outside the home, at work, in social relationships). METHODS: We administered the EDS-DT to 50 workers with EDS (classic type n=35, hypermobile n=14, vascular n=3) and 150 healthy workers (non-EDS). RESULTS: EDS subjects showed higher perceived disability (median 29.31 vs 7.22, p< 0.0001) than non-EDS. We observed a trend suggesting that the hypermobile type has a higher level of pain (54 vs 42) and work impairment (62.5 vs 42.5) (p>0.20), whereas the classic type has greater impairment of daily living activities (18.57 vs 11.43) and in the home (34.29 vs 25.71) (p>0.20). Subjects reporting moderate-to-vigorous occupational physical activities (OPA) showed a higher disability level in the work area (p=0.04). CONCLUSIONS: People with EDS suffer from chronic pain, impaired quality of life and employment difficulties. The hypermobile type seems more compromised in functional areas such as pain and work, while the classic type is more compromised in daily routine and home activities. The employment section was more impaired for EDS subjects who perform tasks with greater physical effort.