HPV vaccination among French girls and women aged 14-23 years and the relationship with their mothers' uptake of Pap smear screening: a study in general practice.

INTRODUCTION: HPV vaccination is recommended in France for girls aged 14 and for those aged 15-23 before sexual debut or who have become sexually active within the previous year. The first aim was to describe vaccination practice among 14-23-year-old girls visiting a general practitioner. A second objective was to investigate factors associated with starting vaccination among girls aged 14-18, in particular the regular practice of Pap-smear screening (PSS) by their mothers. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted from June to August 2009. A total of 87 general practitioners from the large Rhône-Alpes region contributed data on 502 girls/women who came for consultation. RESULTS: 231 (46.0%) of these girls/women had begun the process of HPV vaccination (68.2%, 56.9% and 18.7% of the 14-16, 17-20 and 21-23-year-olds respectively) of whom 139 (60.2%) had received all three doses. 92 girls/women (39.8%) had received only one or two doses at the time of study. However, in 71 (77.2%) cases, the gap between the last dose received and the time of study was within the between-dose interval recommended in the vaccination schedule. GPs reported that 16 (11.5%) had mentioned side effects following injections. Having a mother who practised regular PSS (Odds Ratio 6.2 [1.5-25.8]), having never lived with a partner (4.6 [1.6-13.5]) and vaccination against hepatitis B (3.2 [1.6-6.1]) were found to be independently correlated with the initiation of HPV vaccination among girls/women aged 14-18 years. CONCLUSION: Two years after the start of the programme, only half of girls/women aged 14-23 years had begun the process of HPV vaccination. HPV vaccination status was correlated with PSS in the mother, family status and hepatitis B vaccination. Such information may help to better target girls who are less likely to be vaccinated.

Human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination: perception and practice among French general practitioners in the year since licensing.

Acceptance of the Human Papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine by targeted populations will depend to a large extent on its acceptability among physicians. We examined the perceptions, attitudes and practices of general practitioners (GPs) in relation to HPV vaccination. From November 2007 to April 2008, a cross-sectional survey was carried out among a representative 5% sample of GPs in the large Rhône-Alpes region of France. Both quantitative (self-administered questionnaire) and qualitative (interview) approaches were used. During the month preceding the survey, 75.6% of the 279 GPs who responded had given at least one HPV vaccination and 47.6% had given a vaccination at the routine target age of 14 years. Overall, 80.8% of GPs reported a favourable opinion about HPV vaccination, 17.4% were uncertain and 1.8% were opposed. The main justification for a favourable opinion related to the public health benefits of the HPV vaccination (cited by 60% of those favouring vaccination). The main justification for an "opposed or uncertain" opinion was the too recent introduction of the vaccine (cited by 43.4%). The major difficulties in providing HPV vaccination were patients' concerns about potential side effects (cited by 37% of the respondents) and the target age of 14 years (28.9%). Interviews suggested that the concern about age may relate to the need, as perceived by GPs, to discuss sexually transmitted infections with adolescent patients. A favourable opinion about HPV vaccination was associated with seeing more female patients per week, younger age, and GPs' intention to recommend hepatitis B vaccination. This representative survey of GPs in a major region of France finds a favourable opinion about the HPV vaccine and widespread use of it, despite some concerns that the recent introduction of the vaccine means that we do not yet fully understand the potential for side effects and about the recommended target age of recipients.

Cardiovascular risk markers associated with the metabolic syndrome in a large French population: the "SYMFONIE" study.

OBJECTIVE: The SYMFONIE study was designed to analyze the clinical and biological characteristics, and the cardiovascular risk markers, in men and women with the metabolic syndrome compared to control subjects. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: The study population included 101,697 men and women, 18 to 80 years of age, who had a health checkup at the Centre d'Investigations Preventives et Cliniques (Paris, France) between 1997 to 2002. The metabolic syndrome was defined according to the ATpiiI-NCEP 2001 criteria. RESULTS: Out of the 66,202 men (47.4+/-11.8 years) and 35,495 women (48.5+/-13.6 years) included in this population, 6761 men (10.2%) and 2155 women (6.1%) presented the metabolic syndrome. Among subjects < or =40 years of age, the prevalence of the metabolic syndrome was 5.0% in men and 2.2% in women, and rose to 14.1% and 12.0%, respectively, among men and women >70 years of age. After adjustment for age, patients with the metabolic syndrome presented higher pulse pressure (systolic minus diastolic blood pressure), higher heart rate, lower vital respiratory capacity, lower physical activity, an increase in inflammatory status assessed through leukocyte count and dental inflammation, hepatic abnormalities, and increased levels of stress and depression. CONCLUSION: In this large French population, the prevalence of the metabolic syndrome is lower than in North American and northern European populations. Patients with the metabolic syndrome present several additional hemodynamic, inflammatory and psychological risk markers which could contribute to the poor cardiovascular prognosis of these subjects.

Efficacy and tolerability of low-dose transdermal estrogen (Oesclim) in the treatment of menopausal symptoms.

OBJECTIVE: To establish the proportion of symptomatic postmenopausal women who can be satisfactorily maintained on a low HRT dose of 25 microg/day 17-beta-estradiol (Oesclim 25 transdermal patches), after 8 weeks of treatment. STUDY DESIGN AND PATIENTS: This was a multicenter open label non-comparative trial. Treatment was initiated with 25 microg/day dosage, which could be increased to 50pg/day if required after 8 weeks, according to clinical evaluation. Sequential treatment with an oral progestogen was also given for > or = 12 days/month in all non-hysterectomized women. The primary criterion for evaluation of efficacy was the proportion of patients who remained on Oesclim 25 after 8 weeks of treatment in comparison to patients requiring Oesclim 50. RESULTS: Sixty-two patients were included in the study and 60 were treated. 88.3% of treated patients [CI: 78.7-94.9] fulfilled the primary criterion, remaining with the Oesclim 25 dosage after 8 weeks of treatment. All clinical menopausal symptoms showed a decrease from baseline to the end of the study. The mean daily number of vasomotor symptoms decreased from 8.2 (+/- 5.6) at baseline, for the entire treated population, to 1.0 (+/- 2.2) and 1.0 (+/- 1.2) at the end of the study in patients remaining with Oesclim 25 and in those requiring Oesclim 50, respectively. At the interim visit, patients in the Oesclim 50 group had a higher number of symptoms than those maintained on Oesclim 25. The global efficacy of the treatment was evaluated as very effective/effective by 93% of all patients and very good/good by investigators for 91% of their patients. Overall 91% of all patients evaluated the global tolerability as very well/well, while investigators rated it very good/good for 97% of their patients. The vast majority of all patients (93%) were very satisfied/satisfied with the trial treatment, and 90% of them were willing to continue the study drug. CONCLUSION: Oesclim low dose (25microg) hormonal transdermal therapy was efficient in management of climacteric symptoms in this 16-week study. The good acceptance of the treatment was associated with its high efficiency and tolerability.

Efficacy and tolerability of a low-dose of Oesclim (25 mcg daily) in the management of symptomatic menopausal women: a French open-label study.

OBJECTIVE: To establish the proportion of symptomatic postmenopausal women, whose HRT treatment is initiated on Oesclim 25, who can be satisfactorily maintained on this low dose after two months. STUDY DESIGN AND PATIENTS: This was an open-label, multicentre, non-comparative, four-month treatment study. Treatment was initiated with Oesclim 25 (17 beta-oestradiol transdermal patch, 25 mcg/day). Dosage could be increased to Oesclim 50 if required after two months, according to clinical evaluation. Sequential treatment with an oral progestagen was also given for > or = 12 days/month in all non-hysterectomised women. A total of 1465 women were included in the study. RESULTS: 82.3% (CI: 80.1-84.4) of patients remained on Oesclim 25 across the whole study. The mean number of hot flushes was reduced similarly by 93% and 94% at month 4 in the Oesclim 25 group and Oesclim 50 group, respectively. However, at month 2 the decrease in hot flushes and other menopausal symptoms was less marked until the dose was adjusted, in patients switching to Oesclim 50. In a global evaluation, 97.5% of the investigators and 95.7% of the patients rated the overall efficacy of the treatment as good/very good. Overall, treatment initiated at a low dose was well tolerated throughout the study, with a trend showing Oesclim 25 as being better tolerated than Oesclim 50. CONCLUSION: Oesclim low dose (25 mcg) can effectively reduce symptoms in most postmenopausal women with a very satisfactory level of tolerability. The risk/benefit ratio observed is probably one key reason for good patient compliance.