Circulating Epithelial Cell Characterization and Correlation with Remission and Survival in Patients with Thyroid Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Thyroid cancer is the most common endocrine tumor and generally has relatively good clinical outcomes. However, 15-20% of patients ultimately develop recurrence or disease-related death. The appropriate prognostic factors for thyroid cancer are still elusive. This study evaluated whether the number of circulating tumor cells/circulating epithelial cells (CECs) expressing either epithelial cell adhesion molecule (EpCAM), podoplanin (PDPN), or thyrotropin receptor (TSHR) is related to remission and disease-specific mortality (DSM) of patients with thyroid cancer. METHODS: Blood samples were collected from patients (n = 128) after thyroidectomy or radioactive iodide therapy. CECs were enriched by lysis of red blood cells and depletion of leukocytes. Subtyping and quantification of the enriched cells were performed with immunofluorescence staining using antibodies against EpCAM, TSHR, and PDPN, respectively. Whether the number of a specific subtype of CECs is related to remission and DSM of patients was determined by univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS: The EpCAM+-CECs, TSHR+-CECs, and PDPN+-CECs counts for patients in the non-remission group (n = 43) were significantly higher when compared to the remission group (n = 85; p < 0.001). Receiver operating characteristic analysis showed that the number of EpCAM+-CECs, TSHR+-CECs, and PDPN+-CECs was able to distinguish the status of remission from non-remission. The cutoff point for EpCAM+-CECs, TSHR+-CECs, and PDPN+-CECs was 40, 47, and 14 (cells/mL), with the accuracy of the assay equivalent to 80.4%, 76.6%, and 77.3%, respectively. On the other hand, the number of EpCAM+-CECs (p < 0.001), PDPN+-CECs (p = 0.013), and TSHR+-CECs (p < 0.001) for patients in the DSM group (n = 17) was significantly higher when compared to the patients who survived (n = 111). Receiver operating characteristic analysis showed that EpCAM+-CECs, TSHR+-CECs, and PDPN+-CECs counts were able to distinguish mortality from survival status. The cutoff point for EpCAM+-CECs, TSHR+-CECs, and PDPN+-CECs was 27, 25, and 9 (cells/mL), with the accuracy of the assay equivalent to 69.5%, 67.2%, and 68.5%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: CEC testing is a useful tool for analysis of overall survival and remission status of patients with thyroid cancer. Implementation of CEC testing into routine clinical test may be worthy to consider for patient clinical care.

Circulating epithelial cell counts for monitoring the therapeutic outcome of patients with papillary thyroid carcinoma.

Loco-regional recurrence or distant metastasis usually leads to the death of patients with papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC). Whether or not circulating epithelial cells (CECs) count is a valuable marker in monitoring the therapeutic outcome of PTC was investigated. Patients with PTC (n=129) were treated in our medical center and were categorized into 4 groups with excellent (n=45), biochemical incomplete (n=15), indeterminate (n=37), and structural incomplete (n=32) responses. CECs were enriched from the peripheral blood by the PowerMag negative selection system. Three subtypes of CECs expressing epithelial cell adhesion molecule (EpCAM), thyroid-stimulating hormone receptor (TSHR, a marker for thyroid cells), and podoplanin (PDPN, a marker related to poor prognosis in patients with PTC) were defined by immunofluorescence staining, respectively. The median number of CECs (cells/mL of blood) expressing EpCAM, TSHR, and PDPN was 23 (interquartile range 10-61), 19 (interquartile range 8-50), and 8 (interquartile range 3-22), respectively, for patients enrolled in this study. The number of EpCAM+-CECs, TSHR+-CECs, and PDPN+-CECs was statistically different among patients in different treatment response groups without interference from anti-thyroglobulin antibody (P<0.0001). Patients with structural incomplete response had higher counts for all three CECs subtypes when compared to other patients. EpCAM+-CECs was better in distinguishing patients with excellent response from structural incomplete response among the three subtypes of CECs. The sensitivity and specificity of the assay was 84.4% and 95.6%, respectively, when the cut off value was 39 EpCAM+-CECs/mL. CECs testing can supplement the current standard methods for monitoring the therapeutic outcome of PTC.