Usefulness of a tilt training program for the prevention of refractory neurocardiogenic syncope in adolescents: A controlled study.

BACKGROUND: Recurrent syncope represents a debilitating disorder and quality of life deteriorates as a function of recurrence of symptoms. Although the administration of beta-blockers, vasoconstrictors, fludrocortisone, and serotonin reuptake inhibitors may be helpful in preventing episodes, many patients are intolerant of or respond poorly to these agents. Orthostatic training has been reported to be effective in preventing refractory syncope. Thus, to determine whether a tilt training program could prevent symptoms in adolescents, the following controlled study was undertaken. METHODS AND RESULTS: Forty-seven consecutive adolescents (18 male and 29 female, mean age 16.0+/-2.2 years) with recurrent syncope and positive head-up tilt test refractory to previous traditional therapies were distributed between 2 groups, depending on their consent (24 patients) or refusal (controls, 23 patients) to enter the program. Orthostatic training was started, in the presence of a family member, with a series of 5 in-hospital sessions. The 24 patients and their relatives were then instructed to perform the tilt training at home by standing against a wall twice a day for a planned duration of up to 40 minutes, depending on the in-hospital orthostatic tolerance. Head-up tilt response was reevaluated after 1 month, and the clinical effect was noted over a mean follow-up of 18. 2+/-5.3 months (range 15 to 23); 26.1% of patients in the control group and 95.8% of patients in the training group became tilt-negative (P<0.0001). Spontaneous syncope was observed in 56.5% versus 0% in the control and training group, respectively (P<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Orthostatic training was found to significantly improve symptoms of adolescents with neurocardiogenic syncope unresponsive to or intolerant of traditional medications. Twice-a-day training sessions of 40 minutes were well accepted by patients.

Effects of paroxetine hydrochloride, a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor, on refractory vasovagal syncope: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of the study was to determine whether the well tolerated serotonin reuptake inhibitor paroxetine hydrochloride could prevent vasovagal syncope in patients resistant to or intolerant of previous traditional therapies. BACKGROUND: Serotonergic mechanisms play a major role in the processes leading to neurocardiogenic vasovagal syncope, and serotonin reuptake inhibitors have been reported to be effective in preventing refractory syncope. METHODS: Sixty-eight consecutive patients (26 men and 42 women, mean age 44.7+/-16.5 years) with recurrent syncope and positive head-up tilt test and in whom standard therapies with beta-adrenergic blocking agents, vagolytic, negative inotropic or mineral corticoid agents were ineffectual or poorly tolerated were referred for study. Patients randomly received either paroxetine at 20 mg once a day or a placebo. A head-up tilt test was then reperformed after one month of treatment, and the clinical effect was noted over a mean follow-up of 25.4+/-7.9 months. RESULTS: The response rates (negative tilt test) after one month of treatment were 61.8% versus 38.2% (p < 0.001) in the paroxetine and placebo groups, respectively. During follow-up spontaneous syncope was reported in six patients (17.6%) in the paroxetine group as compared to 18 patients (52.9%) in the placebo group (p < 0.0001). Only one patient (2.9%) asked to be discontinued from the drug for severe side effects. CONCLUSIONS: Paroxetine was found to significantly improve the symptoms of patients with vasovagal syncope unresponsive to or intolerant of traditional medications and was well tolerated by patients.

[Effectiveness of paroxetine in the treatment of refractory vasovagal syncope in young patients]. / Efficacia della paroxetina nel trattamento della sincope vasovagale refrattaria in pazienti giovani.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of the study was to assess whether the well-tolerated serotonin re-uptake inhibitor paroxetine hydrochloride could prevent vasovagal syncope in young patients resistant to or intolerant of previous traditional therapies. BACKGROUND: Serotonergic mechanisms may play a major role in the pathophysiology of neurocardiogenic syncope, and serotonin re-uptake inhibitors have been recently reported to be effective in preventing episodes. METHODS: Forty-one consecutive young patients (13 male and 28 female), aged less than thirty years with recurrent syncope and positive head-up tilt test, and in whom standard therapies with beta-blocking, vagolytic, negative inotropic or mineral corticoid agents were ineffectual, poorly tolerated or contraindicated, randomly received either paroxetine at 20 mg once a day or a placebo. A head-up tilt test was then re-performed after one month of treatment, and the clinical effect was noted over a mean follow-up of 27.1 +/- 6.6 months. RESULTS: The response rates (negative tilt test) after one month of treatment were 57.1 versus 33.3% (p < 0.001) in the paroxetine and placebo groups, respectively. During follow-up, spontaneous syncope was observed in 4 patients (19%) in the paroxetine group and in 12 patients (60%) in the placebo group (p < 0.001). Only one patient (4.8%) asked to be discontinued from the drug for severe recurrent headache. CONCLUSIONS: Paroxetine significantly improved symptoms of young patients with recurrent vasovagal syncope unresponsive to or intolerant of traditional medications and was well tolerated by patients.

[Evaluation of the effects of diverse therapeutic treatments versus no treatment of patients with neurocardiogenic syncope]. / Valutazione degli effetti di diversi trattamenti terapeutici rispetto a nessun trattamento in pazienti con sincope neurocardiogena.

Head-up tilt test was introduced in clinical practice to assess vasovagal syncope and its use has further been extended to evaluate the efficacy of drug administration in these patients. Nevertheless, the effects of tilt test on vasovagal syncope have never been compared with those obtained by ethylephrine or propranolol administration. One hundred and sixty-nine consecutive patients with vasovagal syncope and positive baseline or nitrate-potentiated tilt test (60 degrees upright position for 45 min, or until syncope occurred; 5 mg sublingual isosorbide dinitrate administration if no symptoms occurred) were randomly distributed among three groups: Group A (57 control patients discharged without medical therapy); Group B (56 patients discharged with 75 mg/die ethylephrine); Group C (56 patients discharged with 80 mg/die propranolol). Tilt test was repeated after 1 month, while clinical outcome was evaluated monthly for a mean follow-up of 37.1 +/- 15.6 months. No significant differences in acute tilt-induced syncope recurrence rates were obtained among groups at test repetition since 70.2% of Group A, 69.6% of Group B and 62.5% of Group C experienced syncope. At 3-year follow-up 82.4% of Group A, 83.9% of Group B and 87.5% of Group C (NS among groups) remained symptom free, the most important clinical result being obtained in untreated patients. These data suggest that tilt test execution may prevent syncope recurrence as ethylephrine or propranolol administration. Irrespective of the therapeutical choice, the "controlled reproduction" of symptoms and some psychophysical training of patients to avoid precipitating circumstances, to recognize early symptoms promptly to be reverted by Trendelemburg position, may produce the same clinical improvement as (empiric) ethylephrine or propranolol therapy.

[Acebutolol in the treatment of stress-reactive hypertension. A medium term open study]. / L acebutololo nel trattamento dell'ipertensione arteriosa reattiva da sforzo. Studio aperto a medio termine.

In eleven subjects with normal blood-pressure, but with reactive blood-hypertension revealed by bicycle ergometer testing, oral acebutolol in single daily dose of 400 mg was administered. The controls performed after thirty days of treatment have pointed out a significant improvement of the anomaly and a good compliance of the subjects at the therapy.