Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Indian J Orthop ; 57(8): 1290-1295, 2023 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37525742

RESUMO

Purpose: This research aims to evaluate the reliability of modified Pauwels angle in preoperative plain X-ray and intraoperative fluoroscope. Method: This study included 48 male and 18 female patients with an average age of 36.95 years. Seven observers contributed to this study by measuring the modified Pauwels types and angles on 66 anterior-posterior (AP) views from preoperative radiographs and intraoperative fluorography. Intra-observer and inter-observer reliability was calculated using Fleiss's kappa and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Results: The results showed that the intra-observer reliability for the modified Pauwels type using Kappa coefficient in preoperative and intraoperative assessments was 0.584 and 0.823, respectively. The inter-observer reliability for preoperative and intraoperative evaluations was 0.467 and 0.753 for all observers, 0.647 and 0.783 for specialized trauma orthopedists, and 0.41 and 0.752 for the residents. The modified Pauwels angle assessment in intra-observers using ICC was 0.804 preoperatively and 0.943 intraoperatively. The inter-observer for preoperative and intraoperative assessments was 0.675 and 0.834 for all observers, 0.977 and 0.982 for specialized trauma orthopedists, and 0.622 and 0.823 for residents. The difference between preoperative and intraoperative modified Pauwels angles was 9.75 ± 6.76 (p < 0.05). Eleven patients had their modified Pauwels type changed, which altered the implant selection in 8 patients. Conclusion: The modified Pauwels angle together with type assessment has excellent reliability for implant selection when implemented intraoperatively, and at least two specialized trauma orthopedists should evaluate the fracture lines.

2.
Asian Spine J ; 10(3): 543-52, 2016 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27340536

RESUMO

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective study. PURPOSE: To compare the neurological outcome of transforaminal debridement and interbody fusion with transpedicular decompression for treatment of thoracic and lumbar spinal tuberculosis. OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: Few articles have addressed the impact of neurological recovery in patients with tuberculosis who were treated by two different operative methods via the posterior-only approach. METHODS: Clinical and radiographic results of one-stage posterior instrumented spinal fusion for treatment of tuberculous spondylodiscitis with neurological deficits were reviewed and analyzed from 2009 to 2013. The extensive (E) group consisted of patients who received transforaminal debridement and interbody fusion, whereas transpedicular decompression was performed on limited (L) group. Rapid recovery was improvement of at least one Frankel grade within 6 weeks after operation. Otherwise, it was slow recovery. RESULTS: All 39 patients had improved neurological signs. The median follow-up period was 24 months. Proportionately younger patients (under 65 years of age) received extensive surgery (15 of 18, 83.3% vs. 11 of 21, 52.4%; p=0.04). The mean operative time and blood loss in the group E were higher than in the group L (both p<0.01). With regard to type of procedure, especially at thoracic and thoracolumbar spine, patients who underwent extensive surgery had rapid neurological recovery significantly different from those of limited surgery (p=0.01; Relative Risk, 3.06; 95% Confidence Interval, 1.13 to 8.29). CONCLUSIONS: Transforaminal debridement and interbody fusion provides more rapid neurological recovery in patients with thoracic and thoracolumbar spinal tuberculosis compared to transpedicular decompression.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...