RESUMO
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study is to determine whether severe COVID-19 patients harbour a higher risk of ICU-acquired pneumonia. METHODS: This retrospective multicentre cohort study comprised all consecutive patients admitted to seven ICUs for severe COVID-19 pneumonia during the first COVID-19 surge in France. Inclusion criteria were laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection and requirement for invasive mechanical ventilation for 48 h or more. Control groups were two historical cohorts of mechanically ventilated patients admitted to the ICU for bacterial or non-SARS-CoV-2 viral pneumonia. The outcome of interest was the development of ICU-acquired pneumonia. The determinants of ICU-acquired pneumonia were investigated in a multivariate competing risk analysis. RESULT: One hundred and seventy-six patients with severe SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia admitted to the ICU between March 1st and 30th June of 2020 were included into the study. Historical control groups comprised 435 patients with bacterial pneumonia and 48 ones with viral pneumonia. ICU-acquired pneumonia occurred in 52% of COVID-19 patients, whereas in 26% and 23% of patients with bacterial or viral pneumonia, respectively (p < 0.001). Times from initiation of mechanical ventilation to ICU-acquired pneumonia were similar across the three groups. In multivariate analysis, the risk of ICU-acquired pneumonia remained independently associated with underlying COVID-19 (SHR = 2.18; 95 CI 1.2-3.98, p = 0.011). CONCLUSION: COVID-19 appears an independent risk factor of ICU-acquired pneumonia in mechanically ventilated patients with pneumonia. Whether this is driven by immunomodulatory properties by the SARS-CoV-2 or this is related to particular processes of care remains to be investigated.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH) often requires the insertion of an external ventricular drain (EVD), but blood clots could occlude the catheters. Large EVD catheters may help to reduce the risk of catheter occlusion. Here, we compared small catheters with large catheters for ventriculostomy in patients suffering from IVH. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study. Patients were included if they had IVH requiring EVD insertion. We then compared baseline characteristics and outcomes of patients treated with large catheters with patients treated with small catheters. RESULTS: Between 2011 and 2015, 227 IVH patients were admitted to our 2 hospitals. Among the patients, 28 were treated in first intention with large catheters, and 46 controls were identified. Insertion of large catheter decreased the risk of temporary and permanent catheter occlusion without impact on the occurrence of intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) related to catheter insertion. There was 38.5% more catheter-related infections in the small catheter group when compared with the large catheter group, but this result was not significant. There was no impact on functional outcomes. Surprisingly, the rate of death was higher in the large catheter group. CONCLUSIONS: In patients suffering from IVH, the use of large catheters for EVD reduced the risk of catheter occlusion without increasing the risk of ICH related to catheter insertion. The risk of catheter-related infection may subsequently be decreased by using large catheters. A prospective randomized trial would be necessary to seek out any benefits that large catheters may provide for the risk of death and functional outcome.
