The effect of analgesic state on implicit learning during propofol anesthesia in volunteers.

Noxious stimulation may enhance implicit learning during general anesthesia. It is unknown, however, whether analgesic state can influence this memory processing. Twenty healthy adult volunteers were enrolled our prospective, double-blinded, controlled experiments. Anesthesia was induced with a propofol target controlled infusion (TCI), titrated in step-wise increments to loss of consciousness. In phase A, a 10-word list was played to the subjects while a noxious stimulus was applied (hand immersion in cold water at 2-4 degrees C). In phase B, a remifentanil TCI infusion was added to the steady-state propofol TCI anesthesia, and titrated to loss of hand movement on cold water immersion. A second 10-word list was then played while maintaining the hand in cold water. Memory testing, 2 hours post-recovery revealed no evidence of explicit memory in any subject during either phase of the study. During phase A, the word stem completion test revealed implicit learning for played words. In contrast, no implicit memory was detected during phase B. This study indicates that analgesia with remifentanil TCI (titrated to loss of movement on noxious stimulation), prevented implicit memory processing during stable propofol anesthesia in healthy adult volunteers.

Absence of implicit and explicit memory during propofol/remifentanil anaesthesia.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: High doses of opioid associated with low doses of hypnotic is a popular anaesthetic technique since the use of remifentanil has become widespread. This type of anaesthesia could result in a higher incidence of implicit memory. METHODS: Ten patients were anaesthetised with a target-controlled infusion of remifentanil (target concentration of 8 ng mL(-1)) combined with a target-controlled infusion of propofol with progressive stepwise increases until loss of consciousness was reached. A tape containing 20 words was then played to the patients. Bispectral index (BIS, Aspect Medical Systems, Newton, MA, USA) was continuously monitored during the whole study period. Implicit and explicit memories were tested between 2 and 4 h after recovery. RESULTS: Loss of consciousness was obtained with a mean calculated propofol plasma concentration of 1.3 +/- 0.4 microg mL(-1). At this low hypnotic concentration no implicit or explicit memory was found in the three postoperative memory tests. Median (range) BIS value during word presentation was 93 (80-98). CONCLUSIONS: In our group of young American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) I/II patients, no explicit or implicit memory was found when the calculated concentration of propofol combined with a high concentration of remifentanil was maintained at the level associated with loss of consciousness with high BIS values.

Absence of explicit and implicit memory in unconscious patients using a TCI of propofol.

BACKGROUND: Episodes of implicit memory have been described during propofol anaesthesia. It remains unclear whether implicit memory is caused by short periods of awareness or occurs in an unconscious subject. METHODS: Sixty patients were randomized in an experimental group (EG), a control group (CG) and a reference group (RG). Loss of consciousness (LOC) was obtained by progressive stepwise increases of propofol using a target-controlled infusion device (Diprifusor, Alaris Medical Systems, San Diego, CA). A tape containing 20 words was played to the patients in the CG before the start of anaesthesia and to the patients in the EG at a constant calculated concentration of propofol associated with LOC. The tape was not played to the patients in the RG. Three memory tests were performed postoperatively. RESULTS: Explicit and implicit memories were evidenced in the CG but not in the EG. CONCLUSION: In our group of young ASA I/II patients, in the absence of any noxious stimulus, no implicit or explicit memory was found when the calculated concentration of propofol using a Diprifusor was maintained at the level associated with LOC.