Variable phenotypic expression of chylomicron retention disease in a kindred carrying a mutation of the Sara2 gene.

Chylomicron retention disease is a recessive inherited disorder characterized by fat malabsorption and steatorrhea and is associated with failure to thrive in infancy. We describe a kindred carrying a mutation of Sara2 gene causing a chylomicron retention phenotype. The proband was a 5-month-old baby, born of consanguineous, apparently healthy parents from Morocco, with failure to thrive. There was a large quantity of fats in feces and malabsorption of fat-soluble vitamins. Intestinal biopsies showed a diffused enterocyte vacuolization with large cytosolic lipid droplets. Chylomicron retention disease or Anderson disease was hypothesized, and the Sara2 gene was analyzed by direct sequencing. Analysis of the Sara2 gene in the proband identified a 2-nucleotide homozygous deletion in exon 3 leading to a premature stop codon (c.75-76 del TG-L28fsX34). The father was heterozygous for the same mutation, whereas the proband's mother was homozygous, suggesting a variable phenotypic expression of the molecular defect. More studies are needed to understand the reasons of the phenotypic variability of the same molecular defect in the same family.

Duodenal bulb biopsies in celiac disease: a multicenter study.

OBJECTIVES: Celiac disease (CD)-related lesions have been reported in duodenal bulb biopsies, sometimes the bulb mucosa being the only one affected. The aim was to verify in a significant series whether histological lesions are always present in the bulb of celiac patients, what is the prevalence of lesions when isolated to the bulb, and if similar lesions are present in nonceliac subjects. METHODS: We studied 665 children with CD (241 males, range 9 months-15 years, 8 months), at diagnosis on a gluten-containing diet, and 348 age- and sex-matched gastroenterological controls submitted to upper endoscopy for gastroenterological complaints. During endoscopy, multiple biopsies (1 bulb and 4 distal duodenum samples) were taken. Anti-endomysium antibodies were evaluated by immunofluorescence method, anti-human tissue-transglutaminase antibodies by an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay or radioimmunoassay. Human leukocyte antigen-DRB1, -DQA1, and -DQB1 genes were typed by polymerase chain reaction sequence-specific primers repeat method. RESULTS: In all of the patients with CD, histological lesions were present in the bulb sample; in 16 of them, the lesions were present only in the bulb. Patchy villous atrophy was found in 20 children. All of the patients with CD were anti-endomysium and/or antitransglutaminase positive. The controls showed neither autoantibody positivity nor mucosal changes compatible with CD. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that CD-related histological lesions are always present in the bulb; sometimes this specific site is the only one affected. Therefore, we suggest taking 2 biopsies from the bulb and 2 from the distal duodenum for CD diagnosis.

Dual vs. triple therapy for childhood Helicobacter pylori gastritis: a double-blind randomized multicentre trial.

BACKGROUND: Data on the efficacy of eradication treatment for Helicobacter pylori gastritis in children are scarce. AIM: To evaluate the efficacy of triple therapy with lansoprazole plus amoxicillin and tinidazole vs. dual therapy with amoxicillin and tinidazole in a double-blind randomized multicentre trial, and the usefulness of eradication in terms of long-term symptom resolution. SUBJECTS: We enrolled 43 consecutive children undergoing endoscopy for upper gastrointestinal dyspepsia with H. pylori gastritis. They underwent a 13C-urea breath test, completed a 2-week symptom diary card, and were randomized. Treatment was given in a Redidose box (Redidose Company Ltd., Brighton, UK) containing either lansoprazole-amoxicillin-tinidazole (triple therapy) or placebo plus amoxicillin-tinidazole (dual therapy) for 1 week. The completion of a 2-week symptom diary card and the performance of a breath test were repeated 6 weeks and 6 months after the end of therapy. One to two years later, a structured telephone interview was conducted with 36 of the children. RESULTS: According to the breath test, 6 weeks after the end of therapy H. pylori was eradicated in 15 of 22 children on triple therapy [68.2%; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 45-88] and in 15 of 21 children on dual therapy (71%; 95% CI = 48-89; not significant), and 6 months after the end of therapy it was eradicated in 16 of 22 children on triple therapy (72.7%) and in 15 of 21 children on dual therapy. Six months after therapy, symptoms were analysed in 11 H. pylori-positive and 31 H. pylori-negative children, and it was found that dyspeptic symptoms had disappeared or improved in both groups, with no difference between them. One to two years later, 36 children were interviewed. Epigastric pain had recurred in three of 26 H. pylori-negative and in seven of 10 H. pylori-positive children (p = .001); in three of the latter, pain was severe and required additional treatment. CONCLUSION: One-week triple or dual therapy with two antibiotics achieved similar eradication rates. Soon after treatment, symptoms disappeared or improved in most children irrespective of eradication, but epigastric pain recurred in the majority of the still-infected children within 2 years.