Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Chemother ; 16(4): 362-71, 2004 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15332712

RESUMO

The efficacy and tolerability of meropenem as empirical treatment in patients with hospital-acquired pneumonia was determined in a prospective, open-label, non-randomized trial. Patients from 28 centers in the USA received meropenem 1 g every 8 h intravenously. Of 255 patients enrolled, 111 were evaluable for efficacy, including 60 patients with ventilator-associated pneumonia. At end of treatment 74% of patients had a satisfactory clinical response and 64% had this response at follow-up, which could last up to 28 days after treatment. In patients with ventilator-associated pneumonia, a satisfactory clinical response was observed in 68% at the end of treatment and 63% at follow-up. The overall satisfactory response rate for individual pretreatment pathogens ranged from 65% to 100%. This study demonstrates that meropenem monotherapy is effective and well tolerated for patients with hospital-acquired pneumonia, including a subgroup of patients with ventilator-associated pneumonia.


Assuntos
Infecção Hospitalar/tratamento farmacológico , Infecção Hospitalar/microbiologia , Pneumonia Bacteriana/tratamento farmacológico , Pneumonia Bacteriana/microbiologia , Tienamicinas/administração & dosagem , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Relação Dose-Resposta a Droga , Esquema de Medicação , Feminino , Seguimentos , Infecções por Bactérias Gram-Negativas/diagnóstico , Infecções por Bactérias Gram-Negativas/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções por Bactérias Gram-Positivas/diagnóstico , Infecções por Bactérias Gram-Positivas/tratamento farmacológico , Humanos , Infusões Intravenosas , Masculino , Meropeném , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Probabilidade , Estudos Prospectivos , Respiração Artificial/efeitos adversos , Medição de Risco , Resultado do Tratamento
2.
J Antimicrob Chemother ; 36 Suppl A: 207-23, 1995 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8543496

RESUMO

Data from 3125 patients (3220 patient exposures) treated with meropenem were compared with those from 2886 patients (2960 patient exposures) treated with a variety of comparator agents including cephalosporins (alone or in combination with aminoglycosides or an anti-anaerobe agent) and imipenem/cilastatin. Patients treated included those with bacterial infections of the lower respiratory tract, urinary tract and skin and soft tissues, abdominal, obstetric and gynaecological infections, meningitis, febrile episodes in neutropenic patients and paediatric patients with infections. In three studies, meropenem was administered intramuscularly; in the remainder, meropenem was given by 15-30 min iv infusion or by bolus injection over approximately 5 min. The usual dosages were 500 mg or 1 g 8 hourly in adults and 10 or 20 mg/kg 8 hourly in children. In bacterial meningitis, the meropenem dosage in adults was 2 g 8 hourly and 40 mg/kg 8 hourly in children. The overall pattern and frequency of adverse events with meropenem were similar to those of the other beta-lactam antibiotics with which it was compared. The most frequently reported adverse events were diarrhoea, rash, nausea and vomiting, thrombocytosis, eosinophilia and changes in hepatic biochemistry. Abnormal laboratory tests occurred with similar frequencies between meropenem and the comparator agents. The safety profile of meropenem was similar in adults and children, and the presence of renal impairment did not alter the safety profile of meropenem. Experience in clinical studies in 3220 patient exposures has revealed no unusual or unexpected toxicity. The possibility of administration by either iv infusion or bolus injection with a low incidence of nausea and vomiting also provides flexibility in the clinical management of patients. Moreover, the low incidence of reported seizures and good tolerability at high doses, make meropenem particularly useful for the treatment of meningitis and other indications which carry a risk of seizures, or in the treatment of serious infections where high doses of antibiotics are frequently indicated.


Assuntos
Infecções Bacterianas/tratamento farmacológico , Carbapenêmicos/efeitos adversos , Tienamicinas/efeitos adversos , Infecções Bacterianas/microbiologia , Carbapenêmicos/administração & dosagem , Criança , Ensaios Clínicos Fase III como Assunto , Humanos , Meropeném , Estudos Prospectivos , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Tienamicinas/administração & dosagem , Resultado do Tratamento
3.
J Antimicrob Chemother ; 11 Suppl: 227-32, 1983 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-6341350

RESUMO

Cefotetan was compared with cefoxitin in the treatment of hospitalized patients with complicated as well as uncomplicated urinary tract infections. Cefotetan produced high peak and trough plasma and urine concentrations with a twice-daily dosing schedule. The intravenous administration of 1 or 2 g of cefotetan every 12 h was effective in treating urinary tract infections due to susceptible Gram-negative bacteria and compared favourably with the results obtained with 1 or 2 g of cefoxitin every 8 h. Similar types of non-serious adverse reactions occurred with both drugs.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Cefoxitina/uso terapêutico , Cefalosporinas/uso terapêutico , Cefamicinas/uso terapêutico , Infecções Urinárias/tratamento farmacológico , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Cefotetan , Cefamicinas/efeitos adversos , Ensaios Clínicos como Assunto , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Infecções Urinárias/microbiologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...