Interprofessional palliative and end-of-life education: short-term and long-term outcomes - mixed-methods analysis.

ObjectiveInterprofessional care is integral to end-of-life (EOL) and palliative care (PC) and may be suited for EOL and PC education.We evaluate the impact of an interprofessional EOL care curriculum on participants, during the course, on completion and 4 years laterusing quantitative (questionnaires) and qualitative (open-ended questions and interviews) methods.The course included 14 fifth and sixth-year medical students, 9 social work students and 7 nursing students enrolled in master's degree programmes. Seventeen participants completed questionnaires 4 years later and eight participated in interviews.On postcourse questionnaires, participants attributed high value to interprofessional education (IPE) (4.77/5±0.50 on a Likert scale). Four years later, participants reported that IPE impacted their professional (3.65/5±1.11) and personal lives (3.94/5±1.09) and found PC IPE important (4.88/5±0.33).Conventional content analysis showed that the course enabled discussion of death and dying and provided an opportunity for a personal-emotional journey. It offered an approach to EOL care and an opportunity to experience interprofessional teamwork at the EOL resulting in behavioural change.Interprofessional EOL education resulted in meaningful and lasting self-reported personal and professional behavioural outcomes.

From skepticism to openness: a qualitative narrative analysis of medical students' attitudes following an integrative medicine course.

OBJECTIVE: The present study aimed to explore attitudes of medical students following a course in integrative medicine (IM) focused on palliative and supportive cancer. METHOD: Attitudes to IM among pre-clerkship medical students were assessed following a 3-day required course, which included interviews with international experts in IM and "hands-on" workshops mentored by IM and non-IM healthcare professionals. Student reflections were analyzed qualitatively, and written narratives were examined thematically. RESULTS: Of 161 students, 102 (63.4%) provided post-course reflections. The main narrative themes included pre-course attitudes, attitude changes and influencing factors, and insights on implementing IM in clinical practice. Pre-course attitudes were predominantly skeptical, with post-course attitudes more open and non-judgmental, addressing research on IM effectiveness and safety. Students looked favorably on the implementation of IM in clinical practice and felt the course enhanced communication with patients. CONCLUSIONS: Student attitudes to IM shifted following the course, from a skeptical to a more non-judgmental and accepting approach. IM course may facilitate a better understanding of the limitations and risks of IM practices, particularly in the supportive cancer care setting, as well as implications regarding students' own resilience and professional growth.

From the "what" to the "how": Teaching integrative medicine-related skills to medical students during COVID-19.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the impact of an integrative medicine (IM) course on self-perceived IM-related communication and research skills. METHODS: A 3-day mandatory "hybrid" (online and in-person) IM course was held within COVID-19 restrictions for 161 pre-clerkship medical students, with workshops facilitated by mentor healthcare professionals (IM and non-IM) and student-directed tasks. Self-perceived levels of 6 IM-related skills were scored (from 1 to 5) for history-taking; communicating with patients with "alternative" health-beliefs; referral to IM consultations; assessing risks/benefits; and working with non-medical IM practitioners. RESULTS: 137 students (85.1%) completed pre-/post-course questionnaires, with overall scores improving from pre-course (1.98 ± 0.92) to post-course (3.31 ± 0.63; p < 0.0001), for the entire group and student subgroups (with vs. without prior IM experience). Multivariate analysis found no association between age, gender, primary language or prior experience with IM and improvement in skill scores. CONCLUSIONS: The IM course increased self-perceived skill levels, reflecting the course curriculum and workshops. Further research needs to explore the application of these skills during clinical training. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Teaching medical students about IM in a course comprising communication and research skills was shown to be feasible and effective. The application of IM-related skills needs to be evaluated during the clinical clerkship.