Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Reg Anesth Pain Med ; 48(8): 399-402, 2023 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36787951

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: The ultrasound-guided interpectoral-pectoserratus plane block is a fascial plane block for superficial surgery of the anterolateral chest wall. This technique involves injecting a relatively large volume of local anesthetics (typically 30 mL of 0.25%-0.50%, ie, 75-150 mg ropivacaine) underneath the major and minor pectoral muscles of the anterior thoracic wall. There is a potential risk of toxic serum concentrations of local anesthetics due to systemic absorption. METHODS: 22 patients scheduled for elective unilateral breast cancer surgery were included in this study. All surgery was performed with general anesthesia and an ultrasound-guided interpectoral-pectoserratus plane block with 2.5 mg/kg ropivacaine. Ten venous blood samples were collected at 0 (two samples) 10, 20, 30, 45, 60, 90 and 120 min and at 4 hours after performing the block. Free and total ropivacaine levels were measured at each time point. Albumin and alpha-1-acid-glycoprotein were measured to monitor shifts between the free and bound fraction of ropivacaine. RESULTS: Samples of 20 patients were analyzed. The mean dose of ropivacaine was 172.8 (22.5) mg. In 50% of the patients, the potentially toxic threshold of 0.15 µg/mL free ropivacaine concentration was exceeded. Mean peak serum concentration occurred at 20 min postinjection. CONCLUSIONS: This pharmacokinetic study demonstrated that a 2.5 mg/kg ropivacaine interpectoral-pectoserratus plane block may result in exceeding the threshold for local anesthetic systemic toxicity.


Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama , Bloqueio Nervoso , Neoplasias Unilaterais da Mama , Humanos , Feminino , Anestésicos Locais , Ropivacaina , Neoplasias da Mama/cirurgia , Amidas , Bloqueio Nervoso/efeitos adversos , Bloqueio Nervoso/métodos , Dor Pós-Operatória
4.
Reg Anesth Pain Med ; 2019 Feb 22.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30798268

RESUMO

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Lumbar plexus block has been used to provide postoperative analgesia after lower limb surgery. The fascia iliaca compartment block (FICB) has been proposed as an anterior approach of the lumbar plexus targeting the femoral, obturator and lateral femoral cutaneous nerve. However, both radiological and clinical evidence demonstrated that an infra-inguinal approach to the fascia iliaca compartment does not reliably block the three target nerves.We hypothesized that a supra-inguinal approach of the fascia iliaca compartment results in a more consistent block of the three target nerves than an infra-inguinal approach. METHODS: We performed a randomized controlled, double-blind trial in 10 healthy volunteers. Both an infra-inguinal FICB (I-FICB) and a supra-inguinal FICB (S-FICB) were performed on the left or the right side in each volunteer. Forty milliliters of lidocaine 0.5% was injected with each approach. Sensory and motor block and spread of local anesthetics (LA) on MRI were assessed. RESULTS: After an S-FICB, 80% of the volunteers had a complete sensory block of the medial, anterior and lateral region of the thigh, compared with 30% after an I-FICB (p=0.035). There was an insignificant effect on motor function with both approaches. After an S-FICB, in 8 out of 10 volunteers there was spread of LA in the expected anatomic location of the obturator nerve on MRI compared with 1 out of 10 volunteers after an I-FICB (p=0.0017). The cranial spread of LA after an S-FICB on MRI was higher than after an I-FICB (p=0.007), whereas there was a more caudal spread of LA on MRI after an I-FICB than after an S-FICB (p=0.005). CONCLUSIONS: An S-FICB produces a more complete sensory block of the medial, anterior and lateral region of the thigh, compared with an I-FICB. Our study demonstrates that an S-FICB with 40 mL of LA more reliably spreads LA to the anatomical location of the three target nerves of the lumbar plexus on MRI than an I-FICB. An S-FICB also leads to a more consistent spread in a cranial direction under the fascia iliaca and around the psoas muscle. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: This work was registered with the European clinical trial registry: Identifier Eudra CT 2015-004607-24.

5.
J Hand Surg Glob Online ; 1(4): 191-197, 2019 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37470047

RESUMO

Purpose: To study the efficacy of bupivacaine liposome injectable suspension in prolonging sensory blocks of the median and ulnar nerves for subjects with Dupuytren contracture release by collagenase injection. We hypothesized that combining liposome bupivacaine and bupivacaine hydrochloride would extend the duration of blocks without added complications. Methods: We randomized 32 subjects scheduled for Dupuytren contracture release with collagenase Clostridium histolyticum injections to receive forearm blocks of the median and ulnar nerves with a mixture of 5 mL liposome bupivacaine 1.33% plus 2.5 mL bupivacaine hydrochloride 0.5% per nerve (n = 16) or 7.5 mL bupivacaine hydrochloride 0.5% alone per nerve (n = 16). Sensory block and analgesia were assessed through the first posttreatment week. Results: Sensory block was nearly 4 times longer in subjects who received the liposome bupivacaine mixture compared with subjects who received bupivacaine hydrochloride alone. Most subjects (13 of 16) who received the liposome bupivacaine mixture had adequate analgesia for finger manipulation to rupture the cords, whereas most subjects (15 of 16) who received bupivacaine hydrochloride alone required additional anesthesia. Subjects in the liposome mixture group reported lower pain scores through the first 3 days after treatment. There were no serious side effects. Conclusions: Addition of liposome bupivacaine to forearm blocks for Dupuytren contracture release prolonged sensory block and improved pain scores without increasing side effects or impairing hand function. Supplemental lidocaine injections for the painful phases of Dupuytren contracture release with collagenase C histolyticum injections were not required by most subjects who received liposome bupivacaine. Type of study/level of evidence: Therapeutic I.

6.
Reg Anesth Pain Med ; 42(3): 334-341, 2017.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28157791

RESUMO

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: We examined whether liposome bupivacaine (Exparel) given in the interscalene brachial plexus block lowers pain in the setting of multimodal postoperative pain management for major shoulder surgery. METHODS: Fifty-two adult patients were randomized to receive either 5 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine HCl immediately followed by 10 mL of liposome bupivacaine 133 mg (n = 26) or 15 mL of 0.25% standard bupivacaine alone (n = 26) in interscalene brachial plexus block. The primary outcome (worst pain in the first postoperative week) was assessed by the Modified Brief Pain Inventory short form. Secondary outcomes were overall satisfaction with analgesia (OBAS), functionality of the surgical arm, sleep duration, time to first opioid (tramadol) request and opioid consumption (mEq), sensory-motor block characteristics, and the occurrence of adverse effects. RESULTS: Worst pain was lower in patients given liposome bupivacaine added to standard bupivacaine than in patients given standard bupivacaine alone (generalized estimating equation [GEE] estimated marginal mean values, 3.6 ± 0.3 vs 5.3 ± 0.4 points on the Numeric Rating Scale, respectively, although the effect was modest, 1.6 ± 0.5; 95% confidence interval, 0.8-2.5). Total OBAS scores indicated greater satisfaction (GEE estimated marginal mean values, 1.8 ± 0.3 vs 3.3 ± 0.4 on total OBAS, respectively, with modest effect, difference, 1.4 ± 0.5; 95% confidence interval, 0.5-2.4). There were no differences in any of the other secondary outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Liposome bupivacaine added to standard bupivacaine may lower pain and enhance patient's satisfaction in the first postoperative week even in the setting of multimodal analgesia for major shoulder surgery.This study was registered with clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02554357) on July 11, 2015, by Principal Investigator Catherine Vandepitte, MD.


Assuntos
Anestésicos Locais/administração & dosagem , Bloqueio do Plexo Braquial/métodos , Bupivacaína/administração & dosagem , Medição da Dor/efeitos dos fármacos , Dor Pós-Operatória/prevenção & controle , Ombro/cirurgia , Idoso , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Ambulatórios/efeitos adversos , Bupivacaína/química , Método Duplo-Cego , Feminino , Humanos , Lipossomos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Medição da Dor/métodos , Dor Pós-Operatória/diagnóstico , Estudos Prospectivos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...